Enhancing College Students’ Online Group Work Perceptions and Skills Using a Utility-Value Intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.2807Keywords:
online group work, active learning, motivation, student attitudes, group work skills, online pedagogyAbstract
College students’ perceptions of online group work can be negative, which creates challenges for implementing group work in online courses. Additionally, little research has examined group work skill development, despite calls for better preparing students for working effectively in groups. The purpose of the current study was to test the effectiveness of a utility-value intervention designed to enhance students’ perceptions of online group work and their group work skill use. Students (N = 68) were randomly assigned to view a video and answer an essay question on the usefulness and benefits (utility value) of online group work and group work skills (intervention) or on how online group projects were graded (control). Students in the intervention condition indicated online group work to be more useful and reported greater post-intervention group work skill use compared to students in the control condition. Students further reported their perceptions of the usefulness and costs of online group work, as well as their group work skills and insights, in open-ended items. Overall, the current study provides an effective and easy to implement intervention for improving college students’ perceptions of online group work and their group work skill use.
References
Aggarwal P., O’Brien C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, (3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0273475308322283
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice-Hall.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: tracking online education in the United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED572778
Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.002
Bailey, S., Barber, L., & Ferguson, A. (2015). Promoting perceived benefits of group projects. Teaching of Psychology, 42, 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315573147
Barry, S., Murphy, K., & Drew, S. (2015). From deconstructive misalignment to constructive alignment: Exploring student uses of mobile technologies in university classrooms. Computers & Education, 81, 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.014
Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students’ perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 10, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2015010103
Burdett, J. (2003). Making groups work: University students’ perceptions. International Education Journal, 4(3), 177-191.
Burdett, J., & Hastie, B. (2009). Predicting satisfaction with group work assignments. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6, 1 - 13.
Burke, L. (2021). Community colleges keeping more classes online. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/04/22/community-colleges-keeping-more-classes-online
Cantwell, R. H., & Andrews, B. (2002). Cognitive and psychological factors underlying secondary school students' feelings towards group work. Educational Psychology, 22(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120101260
Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance Education, 37(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1154781
Chapman, C., Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005). Strong community, deep learning: Exploring the link. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500167910
Chapman, K. J., & Van Auken, S. (2001). Creating positive group project experiences: An examination of the role of the instructor on students’ perceptions of group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475301232005
Chen, P. S. D., Gonyea, R. & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a distance: Engaged or not? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104252/
Cherney, M. R., Fetherston, M., & Johnsen, L. J. (2018). Online course student collaboration
literature: A review and critique. Small Group Research, 49(1), 98-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417721627
Clinton, V., & Kelly. A. E. (2020a). Student attitudes toward group discussions. Active Learning
in Higher Education, 21 (2), 154 – 164. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787417740277
Clinton, V., & Kelly, A. E. (2020b). Improving student attitudes toward discussion boards using
a brief motivational intervention. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6(4), 301–315. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/stl0000160
Conklin, S., & Garratt Dikkers, A. (2021). Instructor social presence and connectedness in a
quick shift from face-to-face online instruction. Online Learning, 25(1), 135 – 150. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2482
Copeland, W. E., McGinnis, E., Bai, Y., Adams, Z., Nardone, H., Devadanam, V., ... & Hudziak, J. J. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on college student mental health and wellness. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(1), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.466
Creswell, J.W. (2019). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education.
Cumming, J., Woodcock, C., Cooley, S. J., Holland, M. J., & Burns, V. E. (2015). Development and validation of the groupwork skills questionnaire (GSQ) for higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(7), 988-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.957642
Dunne, E., & Prince, S. (1997). Higher education: Training students to work in teams. 1997; Athens: European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
EDUCAUSE. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report Teaching and Learning
Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219489/
Ellis, A. P., Bell, B. S., Ployhart, R. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. (2005). An evaluation of generic teamwork skills training with action teams: Effects on cognitive and skill‐based outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 641-672.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00617.x
Faja, S. (2013). Collaborative Learning in Online Courses: Exploring Students’ Perceptions. Information Systems Education Journal, 11, 42–51.
Falls, I., Bahhouth, V., Chuang, C. M., & Bahhouth, J. (2014). Factors influencing students’ perceptions of online teamwork. SAGE Open, 4(1), 2158244014525415. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014525415
Finelli, C. J., Nguyen, K., DeMonbrun, M., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Husman, J., ... & Waters, C. K. (2018). Reducing student resistance to active learning: Strategies for instructors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(5), 80 – 91.
Fritea, R., & Opre, A. (2015). Enhancing situational interest, perceived utility, and self-efficacy in online learning. An instructional design intervention. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 19, 285–298.
Garratt-Reed, D., Roberts, L. D., & Heritage, B. (2016). Grades, Student Satisfaction and Retention in Online and Face-to-Face Introductory Psychology Units: A Test of Equivalency Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00673
Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899-906.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075
Hart Research Associates (2018). Fulfilling the American dream: Liberal education and the future of work. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2018EmployerResearchReport.pdf
Hesterman, S. (2016). The digital handshake: A group contract for authentic eLearning in higher
education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(3), 1 – 26.
Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D., & Littig, P. (2010). University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787409355867
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5
Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: an integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0019506
Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000146
Hulleman, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2020). The utility-value intervention. In G. M. Walton & A. J. Krum (Eds.), Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change (pp. 100 - 125). Guilford.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Learning groups. In Wheelan, S. A. (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 441-462). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781412990165
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Koh, M.-H., & Hill, J. (2009). Student perceptions of group work in an online course: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Distance Education, 23, 69–92.
Landrum, R. E., Beins, B. C., Bhalla, M., Brakke, K., Briihl, D. S., Curl-Langager, R. M., Pusateri, T. P., & Van Kirk, J. J. (2010). Desired outcomes of an undergraduate education in psychology from departmental, student, and societal perspectives. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline (p. 145–160). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12063-009
Lee, S. J., Ngampornchai, A., Trail-Constant, T., Abril, A., & Srinivasan, S. (2016). Does a case-based online group project increase students’ satisfaction with interaction in online courses? Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654800
MacNeill, H., Telner, D., Sparaggis-Agaliotis, A., & Hanna, E. (2014). All for one and one for all: Understanding health professionals’ experience in individual versus collaborative online learning. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 34(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21226
Maiden, B. & Perry, B. (2011): Dealing with free‐riders in assessed groupwork: results from a study at a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 451-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903429302
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018) Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance
of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
McKenzie, L. (2021). Survey reveals positive outlook on online instruction post-pandemic. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/04/27/survey-reveals-positive-outlook-online-instruction-post-pandemic
Michaelson, L. K., Black, R. H. (1994). Building learning teams: The key to harnessing the power of small groups in higher education Kadel, S., Keehner, J. Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education, 2, 65–81. State College, PA: National Center for Teaching, Learning & Assessment.
Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Whitelock, D. (2018). Overcoming cross-cultural group work tensions: Mixed student perspectives on the role of social relationships. Higher Education, 75(1), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0131-3
Moore. G., E., Warner, W. J., & Jones, D. W. W. (2016). Student-to-student interaction in distance education classes: What do graduate students want? Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(2), 1 – 13. https://doi.org/10.5032.jae.2016.02001
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2020). Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education–Annual Results 2019. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9-34.
Ouzts, K. (2006). Sense of community in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 285-296. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/106764/
Prichard, J. S., Bizo, L. A., & Stratford, R. J. (2006). The educational impact of team‐skills training: Preparing students to work in groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904x24564
Rezaei, A. (2017). Features of successful group work in online and physical courses. Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(3), 5 - 22.
Robinson, H.A., Kilgore, W. & Warren, S. J. (2017). Care, communication, learner support: Designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning, 21(4), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1240
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1 – 16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Smith, G. G., Sorensen, C., Gump, A., Heindel, A. J., Caris, M., & Martinez, C. D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. Web Mining and Higher Education: Introduction to the Special Issue, 14(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.005
Soicher, R. N., & Becker-Blease, K. A. (2020). Utility value interventions: Why and how instructors should use them in college psychology courses. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000240
Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., & Cress, U. (2014) CSCL artifacts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 237-245.
Stevens, J. (2014). Perceptions, attitudes, and preferences of adult learners in higher education: A national survey. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 65-78.
Thompson, M. M., & Lamanna, A. C. (2019). Catalyzing group work in introductory chemistry: Evaluation of five strategies. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(2), 351-357. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00454
U. S. Department of Education. (2020). The condition of education 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020144
Walker, A. (2001). British psychology students' perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 1(1), 28-36.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), A Vol. in the educational psychology series. Development of achievement motivation (p. 91–120). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50006-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
