Get Connected: A Scoping Review of Advising Online Graduate Students

Holly S Meyer, Kristi A Preisman, Anita Samuel

Abstract


The rate of online graduate education programs grows annually. Yet, dropout rates and student satisfaction rates continue to lag behind in-person programs. Advising practices may offer unique opportunities to reverse or alter these challenges. While the body of literature about undergraduate advising and online advising is robust, literature on current online graduate-level advising is sparse. Therefore, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken to answer the research question: What does the literature tell us about advising in online graduate programs? The search revealed ten relevant studies, and after conducting a thematic network analysis, two global themes and five organizing themes were presented. There are two global themes, “Create Connections” and “Know Your Program.”  The “Create Connections” global theme is supported by three organizing themes: (a) Communication and Feedback, (b) Building Relationships and Community, and (c) Investment in student’s personal and academic growth.  The “Know Your Program” global theme is supported by organizing themes (d) Program Requirements and Policies and (e) Technical skills. Based on the data, three recommendations are presented to aid online graduate advisors, including building trusting relationships with advisees, building a community of students, and knowing program policies, requirements, and technology platforms. 


Keywords


distance learning, advising, online education, student perceptions, graduate education; research supervision; online mentoring; e-mentoring; virtual mentoring

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. ERIC.

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

Baxter, J. A. (2012). Who am I and what keeps me going? Profiling the distance learning student in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 107. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1283

Berry, S. (2017). Student support networks in online doctoral programs: Exploring nested communities. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 33.

Bowden, D. (2004). Small group instructional diagnosis: A method for enhancing writing instruction. Council of Writing Program Administrators, 28, 1–2.

Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well, 90–103.

Clark, D. J., & Redmond, M. V. (1982). Small group instructional diagnosis.

Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294.

Cross, L. K. (2018). Graduate Student Perceptions of Online Advising. 38(2), 72–80.

De Pryck, D., Blieck, Y., & DePryck, K. (2021). Don’t Blame the Virus for the Need to Create a Sense of Belonging in an Online Learning Environment. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 145–150.

Deshpande, A. (2017). Faculty Best Practices to Support Students in the “Virtual Doctoral Land.” 4(1), 12–30.

Erichsen, E. A., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 321–338.

Ewing-Cooper, A. R., & Parker, M. V. (2013). Student Perceptions of Preparedness for Academic Success: The Impact of an Advisor Taught Orientation Course in Family and Consumer Sciences. NACTA Journal, 57(4), 2–5.

Exter, M. E., Korkmaz, N., Harlin, N. M., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2009). SENSE OF COMMUNITY WITHIN A FULLY ONLINE PROGRAM Perspectives of Graduate Students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2).

Fynn, A., & van Vuuren, H. J. (2017). Investigating the Role of Non-Academic Support Systems of Students Completing a Master’s Degree in Open, Distance and e-Learning. 35(1), 186–199.

German, K. T., Sweeny, K., & Robbins, M. L. (2019). Investigating the role of the faculty advisor in doctoral students’ career trajectories. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 762–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1511454

Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20–30.

Grady, M. L. (2016a). Doctoral Students in a Distance Program: Advising and Degree Completion Strategies. 12(2), 49–52.

Grady, M. L. (2018b). Online Doctoral Education: Strategies and Resources for Faculty Advisors. 14(1), 17–20.

Gupta, K. (2018). Case Study: Self-Directed Advising for Distance Learners. 30(4), 68–73.

Hart-Baldridge, E. (2020). Faculty Advisor Perspectives of Academic Advising. NACADA Journal, 40(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-18-25

Kara, M., & Can, G. (2019). Master’s Students’ Perceptions and Expectations of Good Tutors and Advisors in Distance Education. 20(2), 162–179.

Kumar, S., & Coe, C. (2017). Mentoring and Student Support in Online Doctoral Programs. 31(2), 128–142.

Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring Doctoral Students Online: Mentor Strategies and Challenges. 25(2), 202–222.

Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2019). Online Mentoring of Dissertations: The Role of Structure and Support. 44(1), 59–71.

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69.

Maher, M., Fallucca, A., & Halasz, H. M. (2013). Write On! Through to the Ph.D.: Using writing groups to facilitate doctoral degree progress. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381

Mancini, M. E., Cipher, D. J., & Ganji, D. (2018). Maximizing Retention and Progression to Graduation in Online Programs: A Case Study in “Designing With the End in Mind” [Chapter]. Critical Assessment and Strategies for Increased Student Retention; IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2998-9.ch013

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222.

Masengeni, M. (2019). Building trust between academic advisers and students in the academic advising centre at a private higher education institution. Educor Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 159–172.

McConnell, R. (2018). Student Perspectives of Academic Advisors and Leader Development at the Graduate Level. 66(3), 146–157.

McEvoy, C. T., Hunter, R. F., Matchett, K. B., Carey, L., McKinley, M. C., McCloskey, K. D., & Woodside, J. V. (2018). Exploring Perceived Support of Postgraduate Medical Science Research Students. 42(4), 454–466.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int J Surg, 8(5), 336–341.

Omar, F., Mahone, J. P., Ngobia, J., & FitzSimons, J. (2015). Building Rapport between International Graduate Students and Their Faculty Advisors: Cross- Cultural Mentoring Relationships at the University of Guelph. 7(2).

Peacock, S., Cowan, J., Irvine, L., & Williams, J. (2020). An Exploration Into the Importance of a Sense of Belonging for Online Learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 18–35.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4539

Pendleton, D., Schofield, T., Tate, P., Havelock, P., & Scholfield, T. (2003). The new consultation: Developing doctor-patient communication.

Schroeder, S., Baker, M., Terras, K., Mahar, P., & Chiasson, K. (2016). Students’ Desired and Experienced Levels of Connectivity to an Asynchronous, Online, Distance Degree Program. 20(3), 244–263.

Shea, S. O., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970

Shen, W., Gao, Y., & Zhao, S. (2018). Single-Advisor System or Joint Advisor System: The Preference and Satisfaction of PhD Students for Different Supervision Models. 51(3), 222–231.

Spaulding, L., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2012). Hearing their Voices: Factors Doctoral Candidates Attribute to their Persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 199–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/1589

Spillett, M. A., & Moisiewicz, K. A. (2004). Cheerleader, coach, counselor, critic: Support and challenge roles of the dissertation advisor. College Student Journal, 38(2), 246–257.

Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and’teacher-presence’: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 146–169.

Suhlmann, M., Sassenberg, K., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Belonging mediates effects of student-university fit on well-being, motivation, and dropout intention. Social Psychology.

Sutton, K. L., & Sankar, C. S. (2011). Student satisfaction with information provided by academic advisors. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(7).

Taylor, R. T., Vitale, T., Tapoler, C., & Whaley, K. (2018). Desirable Qualities of Modern Doctorate Advisors in the USA: A View through the Lenses of Candidates, Graduates, and Academic Advisors. 43(5), 854–866.

The Condition of Education. (2020). The Condition of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_chb.asp

Wang, W., Guo, L., He, L., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: Insights from MOOC. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(6), 621–636.

Wilson, S., & Cutri, J. (2019). Negating isolation and imposter syndrome through writing as product and as process: The impact of collegiate writing networks during a doctoral programme. In Wellbeing in Doctoral Education (pp. 59–76). Springer.

Woodley, X., Hernandez, C., Parra, J., & Negash, B. (2017). Celebrating difference: Best practices in culturally responsive teaching online. TechTrends, 61(5), 470–478.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i3.2819



Copyright (c) 2022 Holly S Meyer, Kristi A Preisman, Kristi A Preisman, Anita Samuel, Anita Samuel

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/