The Story is in the Structure: A Multi-Case Study of Instructional Design Teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2877Keywords:
organizational structure, instructional design, online learning, leadership, shared governance, program design, centralization, decentralizationAbstract
Although instructional designers are experienced and positioned to be leaders in online learning (Shaw, 2012), it was not previously known how organizational structures influenced their ability to act as leaders in their institutions. This problem warranted a deep exploration of the organizational structures for instructional design teams in higher education. This qualitative, multi-case study consisted of 3 individual universities each with a different organizational structure profile. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and document analysis with participants in 3 key roles at each institution: dedicated instructional designer, online faculty member, and online learning administrator. The research culminated in within-case analyses of each institution and a comparative case analysis of all 3 studied institutions. The results of the study revealed that the organizational structure that most positively influenced instructional design leadership was a centralized instructional design team with academic reporting lines. The results also showed that decentralized instructional designers experienced significant disempowerment, role misperception, and challenges in advocacy and leadership, while instructional designers with administrative reporting lines experienced a high level of role misperception specifically related to technology support. Positional parity between dedicated instructional designers and faculty, in conjunction with implementation of the recommended organizational structure, was found to be critical to empowering designers to be partners and leaders.
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the united
states. Babson Research Group.
Andrade, M. S. (2016). Effective organizational structures and processes: Addressing issues of change. New Directions for Higher Education, 173, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20177
Baer, L. L., Duin, A. H., & Bushway, D. (2015). Change agent leadership. Planning for Higher Educational Journal, 43(3), 1–11. https://www.scup.org/page/phe
Beirne, E., & Romanoski, M. O. (2018). Instructional design in higher education: Defining an evolving field [White paper]. OLC Research Center for Digital Learning & Leadership. https://olc-wordpress-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2018/07/Instructional-Design-in-Higher-Education-Defining-an-Evolving-Field.pdf
Black, S. A. (2015). Qualities of effective leadership in higher education. Open Journal of Leadership, 4, 54–66. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2015.42006
Brigance, S. (2011). Leadership in online learning in higher education: Why instructional designers for online learning should lead the way. Performance Improvement, 50(10), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20262
Ciabocchi, E., Ginsberg, A., & Picciano, A. G. (2016). A study of faculty governance leaders’ perception of online and blended learning. Online Learning, 20(3), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.974
Del Favero, M., & Bray, N. (2005). The faculty-administrator relationship: Partners in prospective governance? Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 3(1), 53–72. https://www.learntechlib.org/j/ISSN-1540-9392/
Eastman, N. J., & Boyles, D. (2015). In defense of academic freedom and faculty governance: John Dewey, the 100th anniversary of the AAUP, and the threat of corporatization. Education and Culture, 31(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2015.0005
Fong, J., Uranis, J., Edward, M., Funk, C., Magruder, E., & Thurston, T. (2017). Instructional design and technology teams: Work experience and professional development. UPCEA. http://upcea.edu/IDResearch
Fredericksen, E. E. (2017). A national study of online learning leaders in US higher education. Online Learning, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.1164
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. Wiley.
George, B. (2010). True north: Discover your authentic leadership (Vol. 143). Wiley.
George, B., Sims, P., McLean, A. N., & Mayer, D. (2007). Discovering your authentic leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 129–140. https://hbr.org
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Intentional Futures (2016). Instructional design in higher education: A report on the role, workflow, and experience of instructional designers [White paper]. https://intentionalfutures.com/insights/portfolio/instructional-design/
Kiersch, C. E. & Byrne, Z. S. (2015). Is being authentic being fair? Multilevel examination of authentic leadership, justice, and employee outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 292-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815570035
Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2017). What do instructional designers in higher education really do? International Journal on E-Learning, 16(4), 371–393. https://www.aace.org/pubs/ijel/
Legon, R., & Garrett, R. (2017). The changing landscape of online education (CHLOE): Quality Matters & Eduventures survey of chief online officers. Eduventures. https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/CHLOE-First-Survey-Report.pdf
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Nworie, J. (2012). Applying leadership theories to distance education leadership. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(5), 1–16. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/
Opatokun, K. N., Hasim, N. C., & Hassan, S. S. S. (2013). Authentic leadership in higher learning institution: A case study of International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 49–66. https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/home.htm
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Paolucci, R., & Gambescia, S. F. (2007). Current administrative structures used for online program offerings in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(3). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/
Pennisi, L. (2012). Experiencing the impact of organizational structure on planning and vision tasks. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 1, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2012.11949365
Reid, P. (2018, December 10). EdTechs and instructional designers—What’s the difference? Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/12/edtechs-and-instructional-designers-whats-the-difference.
Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2017). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Sage.
Shaw, K. (2012). Leadership through instructional design in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(3). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall153/shaw153.html
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Tran, Q., & Tian, Y. (2013). Organizational structure: Influencing factors and impact on a firm. American. Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2013.32028
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
