The Story is in the Structure: A Multi-Case Study of Instructional Design Teams

Jason Drysdale

Abstract


Although instructional designers are experienced and positioned to be leaders in online learning (Shaw, 2012), it was not previously known how organizational structures influenced their ability to act as leaders in their institutions. This problem warranted a deep exploration of the organizational structures for instructional design teams in higher education. This qualitative, multi-case study consisted of 3 individual universities each with a different organizational structure profile. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and document analysis with participants in 3 key roles at each institution: dedicated instructional designer, online faculty member, and online learning administrator. The research culminated in within-case analyses of each institution and a comparative case analysis of all 3 studied institutions. The results of the study revealed that the organizational structure that most positively influenced instructional design leadership was a centralized instructional design team with academic reporting lines. The results also showed that decentralized instructional designers experienced significant disempowerment, role misperception, and challenges in advocacy and leadership, while instructional designers with administrative reporting lines experienced a high level of role misperception specifically related to technology support. Positional parity between dedicated instructional designers and faculty, in conjunction with implementation of the recommended organizational structure, was found to be critical to empowering designers to be partners and leaders. 


Keywords


organizational structure, instructional design, online learning, leadership, shared governance, program design, centralization, decentralization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the united

states. Babson Research Group.

Andrade, M. S. (2016). Effective organizational structures and processes: Addressing issues of change. New Directions for Higher Education, 173, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20177

Baer, L. L., Duin, A. H., & Bushway, D. (2015). Change agent leadership. Planning for Higher Educational Journal, 43(3), 1–11. https://www.scup.org/page/phe

Beirne, E., & Romanoski, M. O. (2018). Instructional design in higher education: Defining an evolving field [White paper]. OLC Research Center for Digital Learning & Leadership. https://olc-wordpress-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2018/07/Instructional-Design-in-Higher-Education-Defining-an-Evolving-Field.pdf

Black, S. A. (2015). Qualities of effective leadership in higher education. Open Journal of Leadership, 4, 54–66. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2015.42006

Brigance, S. (2011). Leadership in online learning in higher education: Why instructional designers for online learning should lead the way. Performance Improvement, 50(10), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20262

Ciabocchi, E., Ginsberg, A., & Picciano, A. G. (2016). A study of faculty governance leaders’ perception of online and blended learning. Online Learning, 20(3), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.974

Del Favero, M., & Bray, N. (2005). The faculty-administrator relationship: Partners in prospective governance? Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 3(1), 53–72. https://www.learntechlib.org/j/ISSN-1540-9392/

Eastman, N. J., & Boyles, D. (2015). In defense of academic freedom and faculty governance: John Dewey, the 100th anniversary of the AAUP, and the threat of corporatization. Education and Culture, 31(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2015.0005

Fong, J., Uranis, J., Edward, M., Funk, C., Magruder, E., & Thurston, T. (2017). Instructional design and technology teams: Work experience and professional development. UPCEA. http://upcea.edu/IDResearch

Fredericksen, E. E. (2017). A national study of online learning leaders in US higher education. Online Learning, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i2.1164

George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. Wiley.

George, B. (2010). True north: Discover your authentic leadership (Vol. 143). Wiley.

George, B., Sims, P., McLean, A. N., & Mayer, D. (2007). Discovering your authentic leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 129–140. https://hbr.org

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Intentional Futures (2016). Instructional design in higher education: A report on the role, workflow, and experience of instructional designers [White paper]. https://intentionalfutures.com/insights/portfolio/instructional-design/

Kiersch, C. E. & Byrne, Z. S. (2015). Is being authentic being fair? Multilevel examination of authentic leadership, justice, and employee outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 292-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815570035

Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2017). What do instructional designers in higher education really do? International Journal on E-Learning, 16(4), 371–393. https://www.aace.org/pubs/ijel/

Legon, R., & Garrett, R. (2017). The changing landscape of online education (CHLOE): Quality Matters & Eduventures survey of chief online officers. Eduventures. https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/CHLOE-First-Survey-Report.pdf

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Nworie, J. (2012). Applying leadership theories to distance education leadership. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(5), 1–16. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/

Opatokun, K. N., Hasim, N. C., & Hassan, S. S. S. (2013). Authentic leadership in higher learning institution: A case study of International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 49–66. https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/home.htm

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Paolucci, R., & Gambescia, S. F. (2007). Current administrative structures used for online program offerings in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(3). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/

Pennisi, L. (2012). Experiencing the impact of organizational structure on planning and vision tasks. Schole: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 1, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2012.11949365

Reid, P. (2018, December 10). EdTechs and instructional designers—What’s the difference? Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2018/12/edtechs-and-instructional-designers-whats-the-difference.

Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2017). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Sage.

Shaw, K. (2012). Leadership through instructional design in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(3). http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall153/shaw153.html

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201

Tran, Q., & Tian, Y. (2013). Organizational structure: Influencing factors and impact on a firm. American. Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2013.32028




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2877



Copyright (c) 2021 Jason Drysdale

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/