Learning Presence and the Reconceptualization of Language and Literacy Teachers’ Online Professional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2888Keywords:
Learning Presence, Online Learning, Online Teaching, Language Teachers, Online Teacher Professional DevelopmentAbstract
Besides teaching the way they were taught, teachers teach the way they learned (Oleson & Hora, 2014). Thus, if teachers are to be guided to teach online effectively, their learning experiences and the ways they learn online need to be understood. This study focused on second/foreign language and literacy teachers’ (LLTs) Learning Presence (LP) as they engaged online to update their teaching expertise in a formal, doctoral-level professional development program (PD). LP is defined as individuals’ self- and co-regulation of their behaviors in online environments in order to be effective learners (Shea et al., 2014). We undertook a mixed-method study involving a content analysis of 9 weeks of online seminar discussions, a 27-question survey that corresponded to Shea et al.’s (2014) LP framework and interviews with the LLTs. The prevalent patterns in the LLTs’ online engagement that emerged were in the Strategy Use and Monitoring LP categories. They demonstrated the nature of the engagement amongst LLTs, including peer-to-peer and heterarchical learning. The findings also provided evidence that when supported by the affordances of the online medium, the LLTs’ straddled “professionalization and professionalism” goals. In terms of the implications, the findings suggested a reconceptualization of three existing teacher PD models, including that of Darling-Hammond et al.’s (2017). The research’s limitations were also identified, pertaining to the way the study was structured, its instruments and their implementation, as well as the constraints of the LP framework itself. Finally, the study concluded with the next steps in research to address the limitations.
References
Bamforth, E. (2021, April 29). Online college enrollment growth outpaces real-world institutions. EdScoop. https://edscoop.com/online-institutions-enrollment-outpaces-real-world-college-thanks-part-time-students/
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs.
Batardière, M. T. (2015). Promoting critical thinking in online intercultural communication. The EUROCALL Review, 23(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2015.4562
Bauer, M. (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. In M. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 131–151). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731.n8
Blaine, A. M. (2019). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended Advanced Placement classes. Computers & Education, 132, 31–43.
Candy, L. (2019). The creative reflective practitioner: Research through making and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208060
Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001
Crandall, J. (1993). Professionalism and professionalization of adult ESL literacy. Tesol Quarterly, 27(3), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587479
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute Research Brief. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_BRIEF.pdf
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
Elverici, S. E., & Karadeniz, Ş. (2018). The effects of social media on social presence in teaching a foreign language. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 4(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.34137/jilses.432263
Flores-Scott, E. M., & Nerad, M. (2012). Peers in doctoral education: Unrecognized learning partners. New Directions for Higher Education, 157, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20007
Fornara, F., & Lomicka, L. (2019). Using visual social media in language learning to investigate the role of social presence. Calico Journal, 36(3), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37205
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 4(1), 47–58.
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
González Miy, D., & Herrera Díaz, L. E. (2015). Tracking the path of communities of inquiry in TEFL: A literature review. HOW Journal, 22(1), 80–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.19183/how.22.1.83
Gunter, G. A., Braga, J. D. C. F. B. F., & Reeves, J. L. (2019). Examining social, cognitive and teaching presences in an online teacher development course using WhatsApp and community of inquiry. FDLA Journal, 4(1).
Hechinger, J., & Lorin, J. (2020, March 19). Coronavirus forces $600 billion higher education industry online. Bloomberg Businessweek. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-19/colleges-are-going-online-because-of-the-coronavirus
Hedlund, G. (1986). The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25, 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930250103
Henri F., & Rigault C. R. (1996) Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In T. T. Liao (Eds.), Advanced Educational Technology: Research Issues and Future Potential. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences), vol 145. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60968-8_3
Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264518
Kang, M., Liew, B. T., Kim, J., & Park, Y. (2014). Learning presence as a predictor of achievement and satisfaction in online learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 13(2), 193–208.
Konstantinidis, A., & Goria, C. (2016). Cultivating a community of learners in a distance learning postgraduate course for language professionals. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture–short papers from EUROCALL (pp. 230–236). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.567
Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2019). The formative role of teaching presence in blended virtual exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 52–73. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44696
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford.
Ma, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Kong, L., Wu, Y., & Yang, H. (2017). Verifying causal relationships among the presences of the Community of Inquiry framework in the Chinese context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3197
Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2014). Workplace learning in informal networks. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(6). http://oro.open.ac.uk/42257/1/325-2585-1-PB.pdf
Mokko, M., & Pawan, F. (2021). Working toward a reconceptualization of effective TESOL teachers’ professional development through “Personal Learning Networks.” Journal of Global Literacies, Technologies, and Emerging Pedagogies, VII, (1), 1335–1349.
Nami, F., Marandi, S. S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2018). Interaction in a discussion list: An exploration of cognitive, social, and teaching presence in teachers’ online collaborations. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 30(3), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000349
Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9678-9
Omohundro, A. (2019). A teacher’s perceptions of language learning and social presence in a blended learning community college ESL course (Publication No. 27663900) [Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Ozbek, C., Comoglu, I., & Baran, B. (2017). Turkish foreign language learners' roles and outputs: Introducing an innovation and role-playing in Second Life. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(3), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6201
Ponton, M. K., & Rhea, E. R. (2006). Autonomous learning from a social cognitive perspective. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 20 (2), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10250
Pool, J., & Reitsma, G. (2017). Revised Community of Inquiry framework: Examining learning presence in a blended ode of delivery. Online Learning, 21(3) (2017), 153–165 https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.866
Popescu, E., & Badea, G. (2020). Exploring a community of inquiry supported by a social media-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 23 (2), 61–76.
Richardson, S., & Díaz Maggioli, G. (2018). Effective professional development: Principles and best practice. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Whitepaper_TD_72dpi-FINAL-ONLINE-VERSION.pdf
Rodriguez, M. E. (2016). Effective pedagogical practices in online English language teacher education (Publication No. 10111587) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Rubio, F., Thomas, J. M., & Li, Q. (2018). The role of teaching presence and student participation in Spanish blended courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1372481
Sarieva, I., & Badrinathan, V. (2016). Asynchronous online language learning: Some considerations. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2322–2329). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.
Schumann, A. A. (2019). Developing language learning and cultural awareness by sharing “Lived experiences” in technology (Publication No. 27548951) [Doctoral dissertation, New Mexico State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Scott, K. S., Sorokti, K. H., & Merrell, J. D. (2016). Learning “beyond the classroom” within an enterprise social network system. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.005
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2012). Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Computers & Education, 59(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner-Smith, S., Gozza-Cohen, M., Vickers, J., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Reconceptualizing the community of inquiry framework: An exploratory analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 23 (10), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.002
Shin, J. K. (2016). Building a sustainable community of inquiry through online TESOL professional development. In J. Crandall & M. Christison (Eds.), Teacher education and professional development in TESOL: Global perspectives (pp. 143–160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641263-9
Smith, B. L. & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is Collaborative Learning? In A. S. Goodsell, M. R. Maher & V. Tinto (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education, (pp. l0–29). National Center on Postsecondary Teaching.
Singer, N. (2021, April 11). Online schools are here to stay, even after the pandemic. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/11/technology/remote-learning-online-school.html
Sugarman, J., & Lazarin, M. (2020). Educating English learners during the COVID-19 pandemic: Policy ideas for states and school districts. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/mpi-englishlearners-covid-19-final.pdf
Sun, Y., Franklin, T., & Gao, F. (2017). Learning outside of classroom: Exploring the active part of an informal online English learning community in China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12340
Toyoda, E. (2015). Collaborative video blended learning for exercising higher-order thinking-evaluation using community of inquiry framework. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 3(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2015.070763
Tunceren, L. L. (2017). Community college second language students' perspectives of online learning: A phenomenological case study (Publication No. 10643256) [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
U.S. Department of Education (2021, June 9). Education in a pandemic: The disparate impacts of COVID-19 on America’s students. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/20210608-impacts-of-covid19.pdf
Vinson, D. (2020). The rise of distance learning and the online PhD: Is there cause for concern? PUPN Magazine. https://www.pupnmag.com/article/the-rise-of-distance-learning-and-the-online-phd-is-there-cause-for-concern/
Witthaus, G. (2018). Findings from a case study on refugees using MOOCs to (re)enter higher education. Open Praxis, 10(4), 343. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.910
Woods, L., Priest, H., & Roberts, P. (2002). An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data. Part 2: Practical illustrations. Nurse Researcher, 10(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2002.10.10.1.43.c5878
Zimmerman, B. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
