Features of High-Quality Online Courses in Higher Education: A Scoping Review
Keywords:online learning, higher education, course design, quality
What are the features of high-quality online courses in higher education? In this scoping review, we explore peer-reviewed scholarship related to the features of online learning in postsecondary contexts. We searched ERIC (EBSCO), Education Research Complete, and SocINDEX with Fulltext to retrieve peer-reviewed literature from 2010-2022 pertaining to features of online learning in higher education. Two reviewers independently conducted the initial title and abstract screening (n = 1,574), full text review (n = 483), and data extraction of the included articles (n = 38). Using thematic content analysis to explore the data extracted from each article, we found that the literature predominately included scholarship related to quality online course design, instructor facilitation in online courses, quality assessment of online courses, and student engagement in online courses. The breadth of these themes included a multiplicity of strategies and approaches to consider when designing online learning experiences. We recommend that administrators, faculty members, and instructors responsible for designing online courses and programs for postsecondary contexts continue to incorporate these considerations to promote high-quality and consistent online offerings. We conclude the review by presenting four high-level considerations to guide these discussions.
Afifi, M. K., & Alamri, S. S. (2014). Effective principles in designing e-course in light of learning theories. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 128-142.
Al-Aghbari, M. S., Osman, M. E., & Al Musawi, A. S. (2021). Contextualizing the global standards for designing online courses: A design-based research approach for developing small private open courses. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.1.1
Amemado, D. (2014). Integrating technologies in higher education: The issue of recommended educational features still making headline news. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.908700
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2020). Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27, 531-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10758-020-09477-Z
Baghdadi, Z. D. (2011). Best practices in online education: Online instructors, courses, and administrators. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(3), 109-117.
Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2010.1.2
Baldwin, S. J. (2019). Assimilation in online course design. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(3), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1610304
Baldwin, S. J., Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2018). Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends, 62(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z
Batanero, C., de-Marcos, L., Holvikivi, J., Hilera, J. R., & Otón, S. (2019). Effects of new supportive technologies for blind and deaf engineering students in online learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(4), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2899545
Bhagat, S., & Kim, D. J. (2020). Higher education amidst COVID-19: Challenges and silver lining. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 366-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1824040
Brown, B., Eaton, S., Jacobsen, M., Roy, S., & Friesen, S. (2013). Instructional design collaboration: A professional learning and growth experience. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 439-452. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/109272
Çakýroðlu, Ü. (2014). Evaluating students’ perspectives about virtual classrooms with regard to seven principles of good practice. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412071201
Carr, M. (2014). The online university classroom: One perspective for effective student engagement and teaching in an online environment. Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(1), 99-110.
Cavanaugh, C. S., Barbour, M. K., & Clark, T. (2009). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of open access literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V10I1.607
Chu, A. M., Liu, C. K., So, M. K., & Lam, B. S. (2021). Factors for sustainable online learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(9), 5038-5053. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095038
Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU122410367
Dalton, M. H. (2018). Online programs in higher education: Strategies for developing quality courses. FOCUS on Colleges, Universities & Schools, 12(1), 1-8. http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Dalton%20Margaret%20H%20Online%20Programs%20in%20Higher%20Education%20FOCUS%20V12%20N1%202018.pdf
Dell, C. A., Dell, T. F., & Blackwell, T. L. (2015). Applying universal design for learning in online courses: Pedagogical and practical considerations. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 166-192. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.2.1
DeNoyelles, A., Mannheimer Zydney, J., & Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for creating a community of inquiry through online asynchronous discussions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(1), 153-165. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/ucfscholar/5/
Dickinson, K. J., & Gronseth, S. L. (2020). Application of universal design for learning (UDL) principles to surgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(5), 1008-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.005
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12528-018-9179-Z
Dusing, G. M., Hosler, J. C., & Ragan, J. M. (2012). Teaching accounting courses online: One instructor's experience. American Journal of Business Education, 5(3), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v5i3.7009
Elias, T. (2010). Universal instructional design principles for Moodle. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(2), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i2.869
Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AFJEM.2017.08.001
Esfijani, A. (2018). Measuring quality in online education: A meta-synthesis. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1417658
Fayer, L. (2014). A multi-case study of student perceptions of online course design elements and success. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080113
Fear, W., & Erikson-Brown, A. (2014). Good quality discussion is necessary but not sufficient in asynchronous tuition: A brief narrative review of the literature. Online Learning Journal, 18(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.399
Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 196-201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Greenhow, C., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364
Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E. (2018). Factors affecting asynchronous e-learning quality in developing countries university settings. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 14(1), 152-163.
Havens, G. (2020). Universal design in the age of COVID-19. Planning for Higher Education, 48(4), 14–24.
Hodges, C. B., & Forrest Cowan, S. (2012). Preservice teachers’ views of instructor presence in online courses. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(4), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784694
Hosiea, P., Schibecib, R., & Backhausc, A. (2005). A framework and checklists for evaluating online learning in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500187097
Houston, L. (2018). Efficient strategies for integrating universal design for learning in the online classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), 1-16.
Idrizi, E., Filiposka, S., & Trajkovijk, V. (2021). Analysis of success indicators in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5243
Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
JBI Global. (2020). Checklist for Qualitative Research. In 2020. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
Jiang, M., Ballenger, J., & Holt, W. (2019). Educational leadership doctoral students' perceptions of the effectiveness of instructional strategies and course design in a fully online graduate statistics course. Online Learning, 23(4), 296-312.
Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). US faculty and administrators' experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
Jung, I. (2011). The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9171-4
Kamlaskar, C., & Killedar, M. (2015). Design and delivery of online courses in YCMOU. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.46501
Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533-541.
Khalil, H., Bennett, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., & Peters, M. (2020). Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. JBI Evidence Implementation, 18(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000202
Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 107-115.
Killian, C. M., Kinder, C. J., & Woods, A. M. (2019). Online and blended instruction in K-12 physical education: A scoping review. Kinesiology Review, 8(2), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1123/KR.2019-0003
King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal Design for Learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 199-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740372
Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2013). Instructor presence in online courses and student satisfaction. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070113
Leidl, D. M., Ritchie, L., & Moslemi, N. (2020). Blended learning in undergraduate nursing education – A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 86, 104318. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2019.104318
Lowenthal, P. R., & Hodges, C. B. (2015). In search of quality: Using quality matters to analyze the quality of massive, open, online courses (MOOCs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2348
MacKinnon, K., Makos, A., Wilton, L., Brett, C., Malhotra, T., Avery, T., & Raman, P. (2020). Instructor perspectives on building community in online discussion-based courses: Issues of pedagogy and functionality. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 35(1), 1-31.
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1), 184-205. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, Article 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482
McGuire, B. (2017). Principles for effective asynchronous online instruction in religious studies. Teaching Theology & Religion, 20(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12363
McKeown, C., & McKeown, J. (2019). Accessibility in online courses: Understanding the deaf learner. TechTrends, 63(5), 506-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00385-3
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Ntombela, S. (2022). Reimagining South African higher education in response to Covid-19 and ongoing exclusion of students with disabilities. Disability & Society, 37(3), 534-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.2004880
Online Learning Consortium (n.d.). OLC quality scorecard sheet. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/olc-quality-scorecard-suite/
Pedro, N. S., & Kumar, S. (2020). Institutional support for online teaching in quality assurance frameworks. Online Learning, 24(3), 50-66.
Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Trico, A., & Khalil, H. (2020). Scoping reviews. In E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI.
Rao, K., & Tanners, A. (2011). Curb cuts in cyberspace: Universal instructional design for online courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(3), 211-229.
Rasmussen, C. L., Byrd, D. R., Nelson, K. L., & Tarpley, R. S. (2018). Comparing students’ experiences and preferences with online courses. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 29(1), 15-31.
Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1404–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312450368
Secret, M., Bentley, K. J., & Kadolph, J. C. (2016). Student voices speak quality assurance: Continual improvement in online social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1112630
Steele, J., & Holbeck, R. (2018). Five elements that impact quality feedback in the online asynchronous classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), 1-5.
Tibi, M. H. (2016). Essential components in structuring asynchronous discussion forum. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.12429
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J. P., Wilson, K., Kenny, M., Warren, R., Wilson, C., Stelfox, H. T., & Straus, S. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
Tucker, L., & Quintero-Ares, A. (2021). Professional learning communities as a faculty support during the COVID-19 transition to online learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 24(1), 1-18.
Tuncay, N. (2021). Online education skills of teachers: Four axes of gaps. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(17), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.772839
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/NHS.12048
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3
Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online learning in higher education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 241–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310303143
Zhang, J., Addae, H. M., Bakeman, M., Boyraz, M., Flaherty, P. T., Habich, M., Johnson, A.,Phillips, A., & Schreihans, C. (2020). Management students' perceptions of online teaching quality. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 14(2), 33-52.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions