(Meta)Cognitive Presence for Graduate Student Teacher Training


  • Mary K. Stewart California State University San Marcos




community of inquiry, cognitive presence, graduate student teacher training, online pedagogy, first-year writing


This qualitative study examines cognitive presence in a graduate-level online pedagogy course that introduced students to the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. Students wrote weekly reflections that described their own learning and speculated on how they could apply what they learned to create positive online learning environments for future students. This article focuses on a reflection students wrote about cognitive presence in which they analyzed their own engagement with the four phases of practical inquiry during the week they read articles that theorized cognitive presence. The results illustrate the value of metacognition about cognitive presence as a teacher training tool. The CoI framework gave students a vocabulary to describe their own learning and prompted them to reflect on when that learning was or was not visible to the instructor. This knowledge positively impacted their plans for designing learning environments to help their future online students move through the four phases of practical inquiry.


Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250.

Brent, D. (2011). Transfer, Transformation, and Rhetorical Knowledge: Insights From Transfer Theory. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(4), 396–420.

Chen, Y., Lei, J., & Cheng, J. (2019). What if online students take on the responsibility: Students’ cognitive presence and peer facilitation techniques. Online Learning, 23(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/doi:10.24059/olj.v23i1.1348

Cook, K. C. (2007). Immersion in a digital pool: Training prospective online instructors in online environments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 55–82.

Dewey, J. (1993). How We Think. Health.

Galikyan, I. & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship T between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692

Garrison, R. D. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263

Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., & Kovanović, V. (2015). Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 53–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.006

Joksimovic, S., Gǎsević, D., Kovanovic, V., Adesope, O., & Hatala, M. (2014). Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.03.001

Kilis, S. & Yildirim, Z. (2019). Posting patterns of students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in online learning. Online Learning, 23(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1460

Kim, M.-J. (2016). Implementation of the community of inquiry model for a blended EFL writing course. English Language & Literature Teaching, 22(1), 85–114.

Kim, J. Y., & Lim, K. Y. (2019). Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: The effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level. Computers & Education, 138, 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.001

Moore, R. L. & Miller, C. N. (2022). Fostering Cognitive Presence in Online Courses: A Systematic Review (2008-2020). Online Learning, 26(1), pp. 130-149. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v26i1.3071.

Olesova, L., Slavin, M., & Lim, J. (2016). Exploring the effect of scripted roles on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Online Learning, 20(4), 34–53.

Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R. D., & Gǎsević, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.05.001

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007

Snyder, M. M., & Dringus, L. P. (2014). An exploration of metacognition in asynchronous student-led discussions: A qualitative inquiry. Online Learning Journal, 18(2), 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.418

Wardle, E. (2007). Understanding “transfer” from FYC: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. Writing Program Administration, 31(1–2), 65–85.






Section II