A systematic Review of Research on Intersubjectivity in Online Learning: Illuminating Opportunities for Cohesion and Mutual Understanding in the Research Conversation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3430Keywords:
intersubjectivity, engagement, interaction, discussionAbstract
Many online learning experiences integrate some form of dialogic interaction among instructors and learners. However, the degree to which these individuals come to a mutual understanding of their task and topic, a phenomenon called intersubjectivity, often remains a question. This systematic review of online learning research examines 48 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2004 and 2021, looking at the overall trajectory of the research conversation across time, disciplines, modality and learning activities; major trends in methods, and focus; and interconnectedness. Findings suggest a dispersed body of literature, with some small groups of interconnected work but little cohesion or traction as a research field. This review has implications for future researchers in this area, who are encouraged to synthesize across this body of research and work together to establish and pursue an agenda for the field that will not only further inquiry in this area but also lead to practical knowledge about learning activity design and facilitation that is useful to online instructors.
References
Abrams, Z. I. (2008). Sociopragmatic features of learner-to-learner computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 1.
Altebarmakian, M., & Alterman, R. (2019). Cohesion in online environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(4), 443–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09309-y
Alterman, R., & Harsch, K. (2017). A more reflective form of joint problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 9–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9250-1
Alterman, R., & Larusson, J. A. (2013). Participation and common knowledge in a case study of student blogging. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 149–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9167-2
Antaki, C. (2008). Discourse analysis and conversation analysis. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (pp. 431–446). Sage.
Antoniadou, V. (2011). Using Activity Theory to understand the contradictions in an online transatlantic collaboration between student-teachers of English as a Foreign Language. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 23(3), 233–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000164
Babbie, E. (1986). Observing ourselves: Essays in social research. Wadsworth.
Baber, H. (2021). Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning—A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the pandemic COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-09-2020-0209
Baker, K. Q., & Moyer, D. M. (2018). The relationship between students’ characteristics and their impressions of online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1555301
Barbera, E. (2006). Collaborative knowledge construction in highly structured virtual discussions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(1), 1–12.
Belcher, A. R., Hall, B. M., Kelley, K., & Pressey, K. L. (2015). An analysis of faculty promotion of critical thinking and peer interaction within threaded discussions. Online Learning, 19(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.544
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press.
Berge, Z., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527090
Bickle, M. C., Rucker, R. D., & Burnsed, K. A. (2019). Online learning: Examination of attributes that promote student satisfaction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(1), 1–8.
Blankenship, R., & Kim, D. (2012). Revealing authentic teacher professional development using situated learning in virtual environments as a teaching tool. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 8(1), 36–53,80.
Bober, M. J., & Dennen, V. P. (2001). Intersubjectivity: Facilitating knowledge construction in online environments. Educational Media International, 38(4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980110105150
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Brettell, C. B. (Ed.). (1996). When they read what we write: The politics of ethography. Praeger.
Bures, E. M., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2010). Exploring whether students' use of labelling depends upon the type of activity. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 103–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9079-3
Canals, L. (2021). Multimodality and translanguaging in negotiation of meaning. Foreign Language Annals, 54(3), 647–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/flan.12547
Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127
Chen, I.-J., & Chen, W.-C. (2008). Cross-border telecommunication: A task-based collaboration at college level. Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(4), 163-189.
Cho, H. (2016). Task dependency effects of collaboration in learners' corpus consultation: An exploratory case study. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 28(1), 44–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000130
Damsa, C. I. (2014). The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 247–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9193-8
Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081376
Dennen, V. P. (2008). Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.010
Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2007). From interaction to intersubjectivity: Facilitating online group discourse processes. Distance Education, 28(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701611328
Eryilmaz, E., Thoms, B., Zafor, A., & Kuo-Hao, L. (2021). Effects of recommendations on message quality and community formation in online conversations. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10364-4
Etelämäki, M. (2016). Introduction: Discourse, grammar and intersubjectivity. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 39(2), 101–112.
Evans, M. A., Feenstra, E., Ryon, E., & McNeill, D. (2011). A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 253–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9113-0
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gergen, K. J. (2015). An invitation to social construction (3rd ed ed.). Sage.
Gibson, K. M. (2013). Fostering collaboration and learning in asynchronous online environments. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 2(2), 60–78.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Hall, B. M. (2014). Designing collaborative activities to promote understanding and problem solving. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 10(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2014040104
Hall, B. M. (2019). Learning through asynchronous discourse: An interdisciplinary perspective on intersubjectivity. In S. Carliner (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1100–1111). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Hammersley, M. (2003). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: Methods or paradigms? Discourse & Society, 14(6), 751–781.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 115–136). Praeger.
Hui, D., & Russell, D. L. (2007). Understanding innovative professional development for educators through the analysis of intersubjectivity in online collaborative dialogues. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3), 25–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2007070103
Hung, J. l. (2012). Trends of e‐learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/j.1467-8535.2010.01144.x
Husserl, E. (1931). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). Kluwer.
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Johnson, C. M. (2016). Rethinking online discourse: Improving learning through discussions in the online classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1483–1507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9395-3
Joo, M. H., & Dennen, V. P. (2017). Measuring university students’ group work contribution: Scale development and validation. Small Group Research, 48(3), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416685159
Kaul, M., Aksela, M., & Wu, X. (2018). Dynamics of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) within a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) for in-service teachers in environmental education. Education Sciences, 8(2), 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020040
Kenning, M.-M. (2010). Collaborative scaffolding in online task-based voice interactions between advanced learners. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 22(2), 135–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000042
Kew, S. N., & Tasir, Z. (2021). Learning analytics in online learning environment: A systematic review on the focuses and the types of student-related analytics data. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09541-2
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.
Kuo, Y.-C., Belland, B. R., & Kuo, Y.-T. (2017). Learning through blogging: Students’ perspectives in collaborative blog-enhanced learning communities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 37–50.
Larusson, J. A., & Alterman, R. (2009). Wikis to support the "collaborative" part of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 371–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9076-6
Lee, S., & Song, K. (2016). Exploring the relationship between resistance and perspectival understanding in computer-mediated discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 41–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9228-4
Ligorio, M. B., Cesareni, D., & Schwartz, N. (2008). Collaborative virtual environments as means to increase the level of intersubjectivity in a distributed cognition system. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782511
Lim, J., & Hall, B. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity in theoretical and practical online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(4), 45–60.
Lim, J., Hall, B. M., Jeong, A. C., & Freed, S. (2017). Intersubjectivity and discussion characteristics in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(1), 29–44, 112–114.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dennen, V. P. (2017). Social presence, identity, and online learning: Research development and needs. Distance Education, 38(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1335172
Mahardale, J. W., & Lee, C. B. (2013). Understanding how social and epistemic scripts perpetuate intersubjectivity through patterns of interactions. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(1), 68–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2010.547204
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A., Gasevic, D., & Pardo, A. (2020). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2019.2916802
Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
Matusov, E. (2020). Pattern-recognition, intersubjectivity, and dialogic meaning-making in education. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 8. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2020.314
Matusov, E., Hayes, R., & Pluta, M. J. (2005). Using discussion webs to develop an academic community of learner. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 16–39.
McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00086.x
McMahon, M. N. (1999). Applying Stolorow's theory of intersubjectivity to Hendrix's imago techniques. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 69(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377319909517557
Mead, G. H., & Schubert, C. (1934). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667957
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). Defining content analysis. In K. A. Neuendorf (Ed.), The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed., pp. 1–35). Sage.
Oh, E. G., Huang, W.-H. D., Amir Hedayati, M., & Ju, B. (2018). Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: comparison between peer- and instructor-redirection. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 489–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6
Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2012). The role of teacher assistance on the effects of a macro-script in collaborative writing tasks. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 161–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9125-9
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, Article 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Paulus, T., Warren, A., & Lester, J. N. (2016). Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review. Discourse, Context & Media, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001
Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003
Peterson, M. (2012). Learner interaction in a massively multiplayer online role playing game (MMORPG): A sociocultural discourse analysis. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 24(3), 361–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000195
Pifarré, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 237–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9084-6
Pifarré, M., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dialogic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 187–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9116-x
Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22(1), 90–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00363.x
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
Rose, M. A. (2004). Comparing productive online dialogue in two group styles: Cooperative and collaborative. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 73–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1802_2
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00037-9
Satar, H. M. (2013). Multimodal language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing within a framework of social presence: Gaze. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 25(1), 122–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000286
Satar, H. M. (2015). Sustaining multimodal language learner interactions online. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 480–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26508
Schneider, B., & Pea, R. (2013). Real-time mutual gaze perception enhances collaborative learning and collaboration quality. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 375–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9181-4
Sert, O., & Balaman, U. (2018). Orientations to negotiated language and task rules in online L2 interaction. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 30(3), 355–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000325
Sherry, L. (1996). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337–365.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press.
Stewart, A. R., Harlow, D. B., & DeBacco, K. (2011). Students' experience of synchronous learning in distributed environments. Distance Education, 32(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610289
Stolorow, R. D., & Atwood, G. E. (2014). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Routledge.
Sudnow, D. (1972). Studies in social interaction. Free Press.
Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y
Sykes, J. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 399.
Szabo, Z. (2015). Better together: Teams and discourse in asychronous online discussion forums. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 23(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.2.100
Ten Have, P. (2006). Review essay: Conversation analysis versus other approaches to discourse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(2).
Thompson, L., & Ku, H.-Y. (2006). A case study of online collaborative learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), 361–375,448–449.
van Heijst, H., de Jong, F. P. C. M., van Aalst, J., de Hoog, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Socio-cognitive openness in online knowledge building discourse: Does openness keep conversations going? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 165–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09303-4
Vandergriff, I. (2013). "My major is English, belive it or not:)" - Participant orientations in nonnative/native text chat. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 393-n/a. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.3.393-409
Vogler, J. S., Schallert, D. L., Jordan, M. E., Song, K., Sanders, A. J., Te Chiang, Y.-h. Y., Lee, J.-e., Park, J. H., & Yu, L.-t. (2017). Life history of a topic in an online discussion: A complex systems theory perspective on how one message attracts class members to create meaning collaboratively. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(2), 173–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9255-9
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard Univeristy Press.
Welsh, E. T., & Slack, M. E. (2022). A tale of two team formation methods: Innovative ways to form student teams. Journal of Education for Business, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2022.2031087
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
Yadlin‐Segal, A., Tsuria, R., & Bellar, W. (2020). The ethics of studying digital contexts: Reflections from three empirical case studies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.183
Yu, L., & Zeng, G. (2011). Managing CMC-based task through text-based dialogue: an exploratory study in a Chinese EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 221–233.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Backer, E., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
