The Effects of Short Online Pedagogical Courses on University Teachers' Conceptions of Learning and Engaging Students During Lectures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3695Keywords:
short pedagogical training, active learning, engaging lectures, higher educationAbstract
Pedagogical training has been seen as an efficient tool to train university teachers to understand and foster active learning. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a short online pedagogical training course on the development of university teachers’ conceptions of active learning from two perspectives: the role of prior knowledge and engaging their students during lectures. The effect of the training was measured through self-reports questionnaires of university teachers before and after the pedagogical course (N=108). The results showed an increase in the teachers’ perception of the importance of prior knowledge in the learning process and a decrease in the idea of learning as remembering. Additionally, the awareness of developing engaging lectures increased after completing the course. The outcomes indicate the benefits of short pedagogical courses for pedagogical development and especially for academics who have not had any prior studies on pedagogy.
References
Atjonen, P., Korkeakoski, E., & Mehtäläinen, J. (2011). Key pedagogical principles and their major obstacles as perceived by comprehensive school teachers. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 17(3), 273-288.
Bolhuis*, S., & Voeten, M. J. (2004). Teachers' conceptions of student learning and own learning. Teachers and teaching, 10(1), 77-98.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: National academy press.
Chi, M. T. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. International handbook of research on conceptual change, 61, 82.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). Teacher educators' conceptions of learning to teach and related teaching strategies. Research papers in education, 26(2), 207-222.
Entz, S. (2007). Why Pedagogy Matters: The Importance of Teaching in a Standards-Based Environment. In Forum on Public Policy Online (Vol. 2007, No. 2, p. n2). Oxford Round Table. 406 West Florida Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods, 4(3), 272.
Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Flores, M. A., & Lima, R. M. (2014). Engaging students in learning: findings from a study of project-led education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(1), 55-67.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics 5th ed.
Fobes, C., & Kaufman, P. (2008). Critical pedagogy in the sociology classroom: Challenges and concerns. Teaching Sociology, 36(1), 26-33.
Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active learning in higher education, 5(1), 87-100.
Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 35-57.
Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained. London and New York: Routledge
Hodges, L. C. (2020). Student engagement in active learning classes. In Active learning in college science (pp. 27-41). Springer, Cham.
Hu, Li‐tze, and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Jones, S. E. (2007). Reflections on the lecture: outmoded medium or instrument of inspiration?. Journal of further and higher education, 31(4), 397-406.
Konopka, C. L., Adaime, M. B., & Mosele, P. H. (2015). Active teaching and learning methodologies: some considerations. Creative Education, 6(14), 1536.
Laato, S., Salmento, H., & Murtonen, M. (2018). Development of an Online Learning Platform for University Pedagogical Studies-Case Study. In CSEDU (2) (pp. 481-488).
Lee, H. S., Coomes, J., & Yim, J. (2019). Teachers’ conceptions of prior knowledge and the potential of a task in teaching practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(2), 129-151.
Lonka, K., & Ketonen, E. (2012). How to make a lecture course an engaging learning experience?. Studies for the learning society.
Martin, E., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Benjamin, J. (2000). What university teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional Science, 28(5), 387.
Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers' conceptions of learners' prior knowledge. Science education, 88(6), 970-983.
Mohr, S., & Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning, 21(4), 123-140. doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i4.1273
Murtonen, M., & Vilppu, H. (2020). Change in university pedagogical culture–The impact of increased pedagogical training on first teaching experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 367-383.
Murtonen, M., Laato, S., Lipponen, E., Salmento, H., Vilppu, H., Maikkola, M.,& Skaniakos, T. (2019). Creating a National Digital Learning Environment for Enhancing University Teachers’ Pedagogical Expertise: The Case UNIPS. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(13).
Murtonen,M., Aldahdouh, T. Z., Vilppu, H., Nguyen, T. T. T., Riekkinen, J.,Vermunt, J. D. (under reviewed). Importance of regulation and the quality of teacher learning in student-centred teaching
Northcote, M., Gosselin, K.P., Kilgour, P., Reynaud, D., & McLoughlin, C. (2019). A professional learning program for novice online teachers using threshold concepts. Online Learning, 23(4), 336-353. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i4.1573
Norton, L., Richardson, T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher education, 50(4), 537-571.
O'Donnell, A. M., & Dansereau, D. F. (2000). Interactive effects of prior knowledge and material format on cooperative teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 101-118.
Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and instruction, 18(2), 109-120.
Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and teacher education, 23(5), 557-571.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers' beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and teacher education, 29, 122-131.
Ritter, F. E., Baxter, G., Kim, J. W., & Srinivasmurthy, S. (2013). Learning and retention. The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering, 125-142.
Rivetta, M. S., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., & Migueláñez, S. O. (2018, October). European higher education: a comparative analysis to evaluate the pedagogical training of professors and to investigate the different models developed by universities. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 1021-1026).
Rob, M., & Rob, F. (2018). Dilemma between constructivism and constructionism: Leading to the development of a teaching-learning framework for student engagement and learning. Journal of International Education in Business.
Robinson, T. E., & Hope, W. C. (2013). Teaching in Higher Education: Is There a Need for Training in Pedagogy in Graduate Degree Programs?. Research in Higher Education Journal, 21.
Stevens, J. P. (2012). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (pp. 337-406). Routledge
Södervik, I., Vilppu, H., Boshuizen, H. E., & Murtonen, M. (2022). Development of university teachers’ professional vision of students’ prior knowledge during a short pedagogical training. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
Teräs, H. (2016). Collaborative online professional development for teachers in HE. Professional development in education, 42(2), 258-275
Vermunt, J. D., & Endedijk, M. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different phases of the professional career. Learning and individual differences, 21(3), 294-302.
Vilppu, H., Södervik, I., Postareff, L., & Murtonen, M. (2019). The effect of short online pedagogical training on university teachers’ interpretations of teaching–learning situations. Instructional science, 47(6), 679-709.
Vosniadou, S., Lawson, M. J., Wyra, M., Van Deur, P., Jeffries, D., & Ngurah, D. I. G. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching and about the self- regulation of learning: A conceptual change perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101495.
Ödalen, J., Brommesson, D., Erlingsson, G. Ó., Schaffer, J. K., & Fogelgren, M. (2019). Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: the effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 339-353
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Trang Thi thu Nguyen, Henna Vilppu, Ilona Södervik, Mari Murtonen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
