Comparison of on-campus and virtual self-assessment outcomes for incoming Appalachian STEM undergraduates’ first research experience

Authors

  • Kristin Stover Department of Biomedical Education & Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7497-6733
  • Kimberly Cowley Youth and Adult Education, ICF, Fairfax, VA 22031, USA
  • Gillian Gaunt Department of Biomedical Science, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV 24901
  • Olivia George Department of Biomedical Science, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV 24901
  • Kristy Henson Department of Natural Sciences, Fairmont State University, Fairmont, WV 26554 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-6565
  • Tuoen Liu Department of Biomedical Science, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV 24901 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-2736
  • Christopher L Pankey Department of Biomedical Science, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV 24901 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6538-5843

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3834

Keywords:

virtual, in-person, research, network, first-generation, immersive

Abstract

The First2 Network is an alliance of higher education institutions across the State of West Virginia striving to improve science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) education by supporting rural, first-generation, and underrepresented college students pursuing STEM majors.  Over the summers of 2019 and 2020, the First2 Network delivered two-week summer research immersion experiences at various institutions throughout West Virginia. The 2019 program was delivered on-campus at four universities while the 2020 program was delivered virtually, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, across nine sites. Before and after the immersion experience, students who participated in the program completed a variety of survey questionnaires for the assessment of their interests, expectations, identity and belonging in STEM. We found that the in-person experience in 2019 had better outcomes compared to the virtual experience, suggesting students conducting research directly under their faculty supervisors in-person and on-site will have a more positive impact on their STEM education and career. However, participation in the virtual format still resulted in an improvement in belonging and STEM identity, indicating that connecting with students remotely is still worthwhile when it is the most viable option. The student population in Appalachia faces a number of academic barriers, so there is much to gain by finding new ways to reach as many students as possible with early career development programs.

References

Anderson-Butcher, D., & Conroy, D. E. (2002). Factorial and criterion validity of scores of a measure of belonging in youth development programs. Educational and psychological measurement, 62(5), 857-876.

Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1).

Bikowski, D. (2007). Internet relationships: Building learning communities through friendship. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 131-141.

Bowers, R. D., Young, L. B., Comnick, C. L., Kasundra, H. P. & Barwacz, C.A. (2022). Perceived Didactic

Curricular Effectiveness of In-Person vs. Virtual Formats amongst Fourth-Year Dental Students. Dentistry Journal, 10(4), 60.

Brent, R., Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2021). Promoting and Managing Student-Student Interactions in Online STEM Classes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(3), 797-813.

Byun, S.-y., Meece, J. L., & Irvin, M. J. (2012). Rural-nonrural disparities in postsecondary educational attainment revisited. American educational research journal, 49(3), 412-437.

Carnevale, A. P., & Van Der Werf, M. (2017). The 20% solutions: Selective colleges can afford to admit more Pell Grant recipients. https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/pell20/

Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469-491.

Choi, J. A., Kim, O., Park, S., Lim, H., & Kim, J.-H. (2021). The Effectiveness of Peer Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Meta-Analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 50, 92-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.09.002

Cilliers, J., Brahm Fleisch, J., Kotzé, N. M., Taylor, S., & Thulare, T. (2021). Can Virtual Replace In-person Coaching? Experimental Evidence on Teacher Professional Development and Student Learning. Journal of Development Economics. 155, 102815

Fauville, G., Luo, M., Muller Queiroz, A. C., Bailenson, J. N., & Hancock, J. (2021). Nonverbal Mechanisms Predict Zoom Fatigue and Explain Why Women Experience Higher Levels than Men. Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3820035

Ferris, R., & Vesely, R. (2021). West Virginia. Journal of Education Finance, 46(3), 377-379.

Gibbons, M. M., Brown, E. C., Daniels, S., Rosecrance, P., Hardin, E. E., & Farrell, I. (2019). Building on strengths while addressing barriers: Career interventions in rural Appalachian communities. Journal of career development, 46(6), 637-650.

Hanna, J., Carreon, H., Fultz, M., Harvey, E., Howley, C., Norton, M., Richards-Babb, M., Riley, S., Sine, A., & Heatherly, S. A. (2021). Impact of Short-Duration Research Experiences on STEM Self-Efficacy among Early-Stage, Rural, First-Generation College Students. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 4(4), 42-49.

Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y., & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 267-282.

Heller, D. E. (2004). Pell Grant recipients in selective colleges and universities. America’s untapped resource: Low-income students in higher education, 157-166.

Howley, C., Campbell, J., Cowley, K., & Cook, K. (2022). Pathways and Structures: Evaluating Systems Changes in an NSF INCLUDES Alliance. American Journal of Evaluation, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211041606

Howley, C., Campbell, J., Cowley, K., & Cook, K. (2020). Evaluation of the First2 Network: Year 2. https://first2network.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FINAL-First2-Network-Year-2-Evaluation-Report-081120.pdf

Khan, M. L., Welser, H. T., Cisneros, C., Manatong, G., & Idris, I. K. (2020). Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: Understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telematics and Informatics, 50, 101380.

Mead, C., Supriya, K., Zheng, Y., Anbar, A. D., Collins, J. P., LePore, P., & Brownell, S. E. (2020). Online

biology degree program broadens access for women, first-generation to college, and low-income students, but grade disparities remain. PloS one, 15(12), e0243916.

Moazami, F., Bahrampour, E., Azar, M. R., Jahedi, F., & Moattari, M. (2014). Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC medical education, 14(1), 1-5.

Odermatt, I., König, C. J., Kleinmann, M., Bachmann, M., Röder, H., & Schmitz, P. (2018). Incivility in meetings: Predictors and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(2), 263-282.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.

Pollard, K., & Jacobsen, L. A. (2017). The Appalachian Region: A Data Overview from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey. Chartbook. Appalachian Regional Commission.

Price, M. (2020). Scientists discover upsides of virtual meetings. Science, 368(6490), 457-458.

Rosecrance, P. H., Graham, D., Manring, S., Cook, K. D., Hardin, E. E., & Gibbons, M. M. (2019). Rural Appalachian high school students’ college‐going and STEMM perceptions. The Career development quarterly, 67(4), 327-342.

Smith, Thomas & Hong, Zuway-R & Hsu, Wen‐Yi & Lu, Ying‐Yan. (2022). The relationship of sense of

school belonging to physics attitude among high school students in advanced physics courses. Science Education. 10.1002/sce.21725.

Soltanimehr, E., Bahrampour, E., Imani, M. M., Rahimi, F., Almasi, B., & Moattari, M. (2019). Effect of

virtual versus traditional education on theoretical knowledge and reporting skills of dental students in radiographic interpretation of bony lesions of the jaw. BMC medical education, 19(1), 1-7.

Stover, K., Hanna, J., Benson, M., Liu, T., & Pankey, C. (2021). Introducing undergraduates to their first research experience using a virtual format. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 61, E1271-E1272.

Wolf, C. R. (2020). Virtual platforms are helpful tools but can add to our stress. Psychology Today.

Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2016). Diversifying science: Intervention programs moderate the effect of stereotype threat on motivation and career choice. Social psychological and personality science, 7(2), 184-192.

Zhang, N., & He, X. (2022). A comparison of virtual and in-person instruction in a physical examination course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chiropractic Education.

Zhou, C. (2020). Lessons from the unexpected adoption of online teaching for an undergraduate

genetics course with lab classes. Biochemistry and molecular biology education, 48(5), 460-463.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

Issue

Section

Students, Community, and Online Learning