Instructor Leadership in Online Learning: Predictive Relationships Between Servant Leadership and the Community of Inquiry Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3917Keywords:
Community of inquiry, instructor leadership, servant leadershipAbstract
Instructor leadership is widely recognized as essential for facilitating meaningful online learning in higher education. While previous studies have applied organizational leadership theories to the study of instructor leadership, fewer studies have investigated online instructor leadership. This predictive correlational study detailed the associations between the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework and servant leadership (SL) theory and employed multiple regression analyses to investigate the predictive relationships of seven SL dimensions on the three CoI presences. Survey data were gathered from 148 graduate students enrolled in online courses in education, communication, and engineering master’s degree programs using the CoI Survey (Arbaugh et al., 2008) and the SL-28 (Liden at al., 2008). The findings revealed a positive and highly significant correlation between the instruments. The predictive model as a whole explained 66% of the variance in students’ perceptions of a CoI. Three SL predictor variables demonstrated the most influence: helping subordinates grow and succeed, conceptual skills, and creating value for the community. Additional analyses at the CoI subscale level revealed that the SL variables accounted for 73% of the variance in teaching presence, 55% of the variance in cognitive presence, and 31% of the variance in social presence. Implications and limitations are discussed and recommendations are proposed to implement online instructor SL.
References
Adair, J. (2009). Functional leadership. NHRD Network Journal, 2(5), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974173920090502
Alotebi, H., Alharbi, O., & Masmali, A. (2018). Effective leadership in virtual learning environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(2), 156-160. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.2.1026
Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Baba, V. V., & Ace, M. E. (1989). Serendipity in leadership: Initiating structure and consideration in the classroom. Human Relations, 42(6), 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678904200603
Balwant, P. T. (2016). Transformational instructor-leadership in higher education teaching: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(4), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.2142
Barbuto, J. E, Jr. (2000). Developing a leadership perspective in the classroom. Journal of Adult Development, 7(3), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009594213701
Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2009). Transformational leadership in the classroom: Fostering student learning, student participation, and teacher credibility. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(4), 296–306. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alan-Goodboy
Buchen, I. H. (1998). Servant leadership: A model for future faculty and future institutions. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199800500111
Chory, R. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1999). The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370120
Dawson, J. E., Messe, L. A., & Phillips, J. L. (1972). Effect of instructor-leader behavior on student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(5), 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033436
Diaz, S. R., Swan, K., Ice, P., & Kupczynski, L. (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.004
Drury, S. (2005, August). Teacher as servant leader: A faculty model for effectiveness with students. In Servant Leadership Research Roundtable. Symposium conducted at School of Leadership Studies, Regent University. http://www.drurywriting.com
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Greenleaf, R. K. (2008). The servant as leader. The Robert K. Greenleaf Center. (Original work published 1970).
Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
IBM SPSS Statistics. (2020, April 16). Transforming different Likert scales to a common scale (422073). https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/transforming-different-likert-scales-common-scale
Kondrasuk, J., & Bernard, E. (2013). A better approach to college teaching? Journal of Innovative Education Strategies, 2(1), 1-17. https://pilotscholars.up.edu/bus_facpubs/26
Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68-73. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007
Noland, A., & Richards, K. (2015). Servant teaching: An exploration of teacher servant leadership on student outcomes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(6), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i6.13928
Noland, A, & Richards, K. (2014). The relationship among transformational teaching and student motivation and learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(3), 5-20. https://uncw.edu/jet/articles/vol14_3/noland.pdf
Pounder, J. S. (2009). Transformational classroom leadership: A basis for academic staff development. Journal of Management Development, 28(4), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710910947353
Richardson, J. C., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Ice, P., Swan, K. P., & Garrison, D. R. (2012) Using the community of inquiry framework to inform effective instructional design. In L. Moller and J. B. Huett (Eds.) The next generation of distance education (pp. 97-125). Springer.
Richardson, J., Koehler, A., Besser, E., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 256-297. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl
Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. International Journal of e-learning & Distance Education, 23(1), 19-48. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/474
Sahawneh, F., & Benuto, L. (2018). The relationship between instructor servant leadership behaviors and satisfaction with instructors in an online setting. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1066
Shea, P., Hayes, S., & Vickers, J. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 127-154. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.915
Sheridan, K. & Kelly, M. A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 767-779. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/sheridan_1210.pdf
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
Szeto, E. (2015). Community of inquiry as an instructional approach: What effects of teaching, social and cognitive presences are there in blended synchronous learning and teaching? Computers & Education, 81, 191-201. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009-2018), Sustainability, 12(12), Article 5153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125153
van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
Vesely, P., Bloom, L., & Sherlock, J. (2007). Key elements of building online community: Comparing faculty and student perceptions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 234-245. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no3/vesely.pdf
Winston, B., & Fields, D. (2015). Seeking and measuring the essential behaviors of servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(4), 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2013-0135
Xin, C. (2012). A critique of the community of inquiry framework. The Journal of Distance Education, 26(1), 1-15. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/download/755/1333
Xu, H., Zhong, M., & Liden, R. C. (2020). The state of the art in academic servant leadership research: A systematic review. In J. C. Burkhardt & J. Y. Joslin (Eds.), Inspiration for servant-leaders: Lessons from fifty years of research and practice (pp. 46-102). Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
Zhang, Y., Tian, Y., Yao, L., Duan, C., Sun, X., & Niu, G. (2022). Individual differences matter in the effect of teaching presence on perceived learning: From the social cognitive perspective of self-regulated learning. Computers and Education, 179, Article 104427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104427
Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12383
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sally Meech, Adrie A Koehler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
