The SAMR Model as a Framework for Evaluating mLearning

Danae Romrell, Lisa C. Kidder, Emma Wood

Abstract


As mobile devices become more prominent in the lives of students, the use of mobile devices has the potential to transform learning. Mobile learning, or mLearning, is defined as learning that is personalized, situated, and connected through the use of a mobile device. As mLearning activities are developed, there is a need for a framework within which mLearning activities can be evaluated. The SAMR Model (Puentadura, 2012) provides such a framework. This paper reviews recent literature on mLearning and provides examples of activities that fall within each of the four classifications of the SAMR Model: substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition.

Keywords


mobile; mlearning; SAMR; learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alden, J. (2013). Accommodating mobile learning in college programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 109–122. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v17n1/accommodating-mobile-learning-college-programs

Brett, P. (2008). MeLAS mobiles enhancing learning and support final report. JISC (pp. 1–25). Wolverhampton, UK. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearninginnovation/melasfinalreport.pdf

Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015

Chuang, Y.-H., & Tsao, C.-W. (2013). Enhancing nursing students’ medication knowledge: The effect of learning materials delivered by short message service. Computers & Education, 61, 168–175. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.013

Cochrane, T. D. (2010). Exploring mobile learning success factors. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 18(2), 133–148. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.494718 Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01384.x/abstract

Cochrane, T. D. (2012). Secrets of mlearning failures: Confronting reality. Research in Learning Technology, 5(2012 Conference Proceedings - A confrontation with reality), 123–134. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/19186

Cornelius, S., & Marston, P. (2009). Towards an understanding of the virtual context in mobile learning. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 161–172. doi:10.1080/09687760903247617 Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/10874

Cornelius, S., Marston, P., & Gemmell, A. (2011). SMS text messaging for real-time simulations in Higher Education. In J. Traxler & J. Wishart (Eds.), Making mobile learning work: Case studies of practice (pp. 13–17). Bristol: ES. Retrieved from http://escalate.ac.uk/downloads/8250.pdf

Dyson, L. E., Litchfield, A., Lawrence, E., Raban, R., & Leijdekkers, P. (2009). Advancing the m-learning research agenda for active, experiential learning: Four case studies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 250–267. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/dyson.html

Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491–498. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016

Gedik, N., Hanci-Karademirci, A., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2012). Key instructional design issues in a cellular phone-based mobile learning project. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1149–1159. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.002

Gromik, N. (2012). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 223–230. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.013

Grönlund, Å., & Islam, Y. M. (2010). A mobile e-learning environment for developing countries: The Bangladesh Virtual Interactive Classroom. Information Technology for Development, 16(4), 244–259. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02681101003746490

Hockly, N. (2013). Technology for the language teacher: Mobile learning. ELT Journal, 67(1), 80–84. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs064 Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/67/1/80.full

Huang, R.-T., Jang, S.-J., Machtmes, K., & Deggs, D. (2012). Investigating the roles of perceived playfulness, resistance to change and self-management of learning in mobile English learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1004–1015. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01239.x Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01239.x/abstract

Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1063519), 1–17. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14406 Retrieved from http://researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/14406

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(02), 157–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202

Lan, Y.-F., Tsai, P.-W., Yang, S.-H., & Hung, C.-L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122–1135. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S036013151200125X

Liu, P.-H. E., & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1–E4. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01302.x Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01302.x/abstract

Pfeiffer, V. D. I., Gemballa, S., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Situated learning in the mobile age: Mobile devices on a field trip to the sea. Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 187–199. doi:10.1080/09687760903247666 Retreived from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/10876

Puentedura, R.R. (2012). The SAMR model: Background and exemplars. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000073.html

Redondo, E., Fonseca, D., Sánchez, A., & Navarro, I. (2013). New strategies using handheld augmented reality and mobile learning-teaching methodologies, in architecture and building engineering degrees. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 52-61. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705091301212X

Traxler, J. (2010). Students and mobile devices. Research in Learning Technology, 18(2), 149–160. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.492847 Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/10759

Wang, J., Yu, W., & Wu, E. (2013). Empowering mobile assisted social e-learning: Students’ expectations and perceptions. World Journal of Education, 3(2). doi:10.5430/wje.v3n2p59 Retrieved from http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/wje/article/view/2697

Wu, P.-H., Hwang, G.-J., Su, L.-H., & Huang, Y.-M. (2012). A context-aware mobile learning system for supporting cognitive apprenticeships in nursing skills training. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 223–236. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ979517




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.435