Gamifying English Proficiency: A Needs Analysis for EFL Student Course Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4506Keywords:
EFL students, English Proficiency, gamification, need analysisAbstract
This study addresses critical gaps in English proficiency assessments, particularly for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students, by focusing on the foundational aspect of needs analysis in designing a platform to assist EFL students in preparation for real English proficiency tests. The existing tests, such as TOEFL and IELTS, often fail to align with the practical language skills necessary for test preparation. By conducting a needs analysis, this research aims to lay a robust foundation for the development of a gamified platform tailored to the specific linguistic demands of EFL learners. Employing a cross-sectional survey method, 120 participants from various academic levels were purposively selected from the Faculty of Letters at Universitas Negeri Malang. The findings reveal both positive and negative insights into learner preferences and goals, highlighting the importance of interactive learning experiences and practical application opportunities. The study underscores the transformative potential of gamification in language learning, emphasizing its ability to enhance learner engagement and motivation. The implications of the study extend to language educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers, advocating for the integration of learner-centred approaches and gamified elements into English proficiency courses. Recommendations include the development of tailored instructional materials and the implementation of innovative pedagogical strategies to address the diverse needs of EFL students effectively.
References
Amaya-Díaz, I. Y., & Bajaña-Zajia, J. X. (2020). The use of gamification to enhance the English as a foreign language. Polo Del Conocimiento, 5(3), 865–881.
Chemir, S., & Kitila, T. (2022). Learners’ needs analysis for English for academic purposes in Ethiopian higher education institutions: The case of Wachemo University freshman students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2026190
Chen, C.-C., Huang, C., Gribbins, M., & Swan, K. (2018). Gamify online courses with tools built into your learning management system (LMS) to enhance self-determined and active learning. Online Learning, 22(3), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i3.1466
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative Research. Pearson.
Demirbilek, M., Talan, T., & Alzouebi, K. (2022). An examination of the factors and challenges to adopting gamification in English foreign language teaching. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 654–668. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.358
Elyas, T., & Alghofaili, N. M. (2019). Native English speakers versus non-native English speakers: The impact of language teachers on EFL learner’s English proficiency. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1773
Eshtehardi, R. (2017). Needs analysis and course design: A framework for designing exam courses. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(6), 274. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.6p.274
Erümit, S. F., & Yılmaz, T. K. (2022). Gamification design in education: What might give a sense of play and learning? Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09604-y
Freeman, D. (2017). The case for teachers’ classroom English proficiency. RELC Journal, 48(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217691073
Friedrich, J., Becker, M., Kramer, F., Wirth, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 106, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.009
Frost, K., Clothier, J., Huisman, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2020). Responding to a TOEFL iBT integrated speaking task: Mapping task demands and test takers’ use of stimulus content. Language Testing, 37(1), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219860750
Hammad, A. A. (2022). Investigating the low English proficiency of Saudi EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.9
Hess, A. K. N., & Greer, K. (2016). Designing for engagement: Using the ADDIE model to integrate high-impact practices into an online information literacy course. Comminfolit, 10(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.27
Huseinović, L. (2023). The effects of gamification on student motivation and achievement in learning English as a foreign language in higher education. MAP Education and Humanities, 10–36. https://doi.org/10.53880/2744-2373.2023.4.10
Işıklı, C., & Tarakçıoğlu, A. Ö. (2017). Investigating problems of English literature teaching to EFL high school students in Turkey with focus on language proficiency. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 82–95. www.jlls.org
Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation and Gaming, 45(6), 752–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660
Lee, J. H., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). An exploratory study on the relationships between attitudes toward classroom language choice, motivation, and proficiency of EFL learners. System, 67, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.017
Lee, O. (2018). English language proficiency standards aligned with content standards. Educational Researcher, 47(5), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18763775
Mafulah, S., Basthomi, Y., Cahyono, B. Y., & Suryati, N. (2023). Exploring Indonesian EFL teacher-student interactions in online learning. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.23804
Matiini, G., & Octasylva, A. R. P. (2020). English for IELTS test preparation: The needs analysis. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 5(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v4i2.4154
Mustafa, F., & Apriadi, H. (2016). DIY: Designing a reading test as reliable as a paper-based TOEFL designed by ETS. Proceedings of the 1st EEIC in Conjunction with the 2nd RGRS-CAPEU between Sultan Idris Education University and Syiah Kuala University, 402–407.
Pereira, A. & Wahi, M. (2021). Development and testing of a roleplaying gamification module to enhance deeper learning of case studies in an accelerated online management theory course. Online Learning, 25(3), 101-127. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2273
Phuong, Y. H., & Vo, P. Q. (2019). Students’ learning autonomy, involvement and motivation towards their English proficiency. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.4.1.1-12
Puig, A., Rodríguez, I., Rodríguez, Á., & Gallego, I. (2023). Evaluating learner engagement with gamification in online courses. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031535
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Joko, N. (2018). English language proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and prospects. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(3), 618–629. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618
Richards, J. C. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency, pedagogy and performance. RELC Journal, 48(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690059
Romsi, A., Widodo, J. P., & Slamet, J. (2024). Empowering slow learners: Gamification’s impact on students’ engagement and academic performance in an LMS for undergraduate students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.2.2040
Sarifa, N. (2020). Enhancing EFL learners’ English proficiency and intelligence by implementing the Eclectic method of language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.9
Slamet, J., & Mukminatien, N. (2024). Developing an online formative assessment instrument for listening skill through LMS. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 188–211. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270382
Tan, Y.L.L. (2018). Meaningful gamification and students’ motivation: A strategy for scaffolding reading material. Online Learning, 22(2), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1167
Welbers, K., Konijn, E. A., Burgers, C., de Vaate, A. B., Eden, A., & Brugman, B. C. (2019). Gamification as a tool for engaging student learning: A field experiment with a gamified app. E-Learning and Digital Media, 16(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018818342
Wolf, M. K., Bailey, A. L., Ballard, L., Wang, Y., & Pogossian, A. (2023). Unpacking the language demands in academic content and English language proficiency standards for English learners. International Multilingual Research Journal, 17(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2022.2116221
Wu, Z. (2019). Lower English proficiency means poorer feedback performance? A mixed-methods study. Assessing Writing, 41, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.05.001
Wulyani, A. N., Elgort, I., & Coxhead, A. (2019). Exploring EFL teachers’ English language proficiency: Lessons from Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20217
Yang, H., Su, J., & Bradley, K. D. (2020). Applying the Rasch model to evaluate the self-directed online learning scale (SDOLS) for graduate students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 1–22.
Yassi, A. H., Hanafiah, W., Sahib, H., Aswad, M., Nurchalis, N. F., & Azizi, Z. (2023). Exploring the effects of pair-interaction model on improving Indonesian adult learners’ English proficiency. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.27406
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yazid Basthomi, Francisca Maria Ivone, M. Kharis, Joko Slamet

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

