Motivations Matter: Predicting Entrepreneurship Education MOOC Course Completion with a Decision Tree Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i1.4517Keywords:
decision tree, online entrepreneurial education, distance learning, entrepreneurial intention, online completion rateAbstract
Online entrepreneurship education (EE) courses experienced a sharp 66% spike in demand around March 2020, attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent surge in digital entrepreneurship uptake. Completion rates serve as a key indicator of online MOOC efficacy, with students’ psychological attributes and contextual factors often examined as explanatory variables in assessing online course completion. This mixed-methods study explores influential factors in student retention in an EE Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) by using survey responses from 222 Malaysian youths who voluntarily registered for an EE MOOC, which was active from February to October 2021. A Decision Tree approach was chosen to predict the course completion likelihood based on sociodemographic and psychological factors, while qualitative content analysis was conducted to explore participant course enrollment motivations from their textual responses. The results indicated that entrepreneurial intention (EI) does not necessarily translate into EE MOOC completion. Instead, internal locus of control and socioeconomic factors held more priority in predicting completion status. These results were reflected in the students’ thematic narratives from their textual responses. Both completed (CP) and dropout participants (DP) expressed similar entrepreneurial interests and, indeed, in the transferability of entrepreneurial skills and knowledge beyond entrepreneurial settings. However, there was a distinction in clarity; most CPs had well-defined and detailed enrolment goals, whereas the narratives from DPs were mainly ambiguous. Overall, the study contributes to the methodological discussion of using decision tree modelling, expands the application of Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) and informs practical implications in online EE context.
References
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848
Babyak, M. A. (2004). What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66(3), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., & Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130041001
Batterham, P. J., Christensen, H., & Mackinnon, A. J. (2009). Modifiable risk factors predicting major depressive disorder at four year follow-up: A decision tree approach. BMC Psychiatry, 9, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-9-75
Buchanan, E. M., & Scofield, J. E. (2018). Methods to detect low quality data and its implication for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2586–2596. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1035-6
Cardon, M. S., & Kirk, C. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial passion as mediator of the self–efficacy to persistence relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12089
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3
Chen, L., Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2021). Online and blended entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of applied educational technologies. Entrepreneurship Education, 4, 191–232.
Coursera. (2024). Coursera Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Financial Results. Coursera. https://investor.coursera.com/news/news-details/2024/Coursera-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2023-Financial-Results/default.aspx
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
De Vries, H., Elliott, M. N., Kanouse, D. E., & Teleki, S. S. (2008). Using pooled kappa to summarize interrater agreement across many items. Field Methods, 20(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08317166
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Emanuel, E. J. (2013). MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature, 503(7476), 342–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/503342a
Flores, L. Y., Navarro, R. L., & Ali, S. R. (2017). The state of scct research in relation to social class: Future directions. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658649
Flores, R., Ari, F., Inan, F. A., & Arslan-Ari, I. (2012). The impact of adapting content for students with individual differences. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 251–261.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Fouad, N. A., & Santana, M. C. (2017). SCCT and underrepresented populations in STEM fields: Moving the needle. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658324
Garratt-Reed, D., Roberts, L. D., & Heritage, B. (2016). Grades, student satisfaction and retention in online and face-to-face introductory psychology units: A test of equivalency theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00673
Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
Guerrero, M., Liñán, F., & Cáceres-Carrasco, F. R. (2021). The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: A comparison across developed and developing economies. Small Business Economics, 57(4), 1733–1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00392-2
Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42.
Hoang, G., Le, T. T. T., Tran, A. K. T., & Du, T. (2020). Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Vietnam: The mediating roles of self-efficacy and learning orientation. Education + Training, 63(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2020-0142
Holder, B. (2007). An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.002
Jones, C. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: Revisiting our role and its purpose. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(4), 500–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011088697
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
Kizilcec, R. F., Davis, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Towards equal opportunities in moocs: Affirmation reduces gender & social-class achievement gaps in China. Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3051460
Kovaleva, A. (2012). The IE-4: Construction and validation of a short scale for the assessment of locus of control (Vol. 9). GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.37119
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.006
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. T., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In Career Choice and Development 4, pp. 255–311. Jossey-Bass.
Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the Locus of Control construct (pp. 1–15). Academic Press.
Liguori, E., & Winkler, C. (2020). From offline to online: Challenges and opportunities for entrepreneurship education following the COVID-19 pandemic. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420916738
Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x
Liu, M.-C., & Chi, M.-H. (2012). Investigating learner affective performance in web-based learning by using entrepreneurship as a metaphor. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 202–213.
Liu, X., Lin, C., Zhao, G., & Zhao, D. (2019). Research on the effects of entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial self-efficacy on college students’ entrepreneurial intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00869
Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17–48.
Mathrani, A., Sarvesh, T., & Umer, R. (2022). Digital divide framework: Online learning in developing countries during the COVID-19 lockdown. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(5), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1981253
Mescon, T., & van Rest, E. (2021, March 15). Entrepreneurship is an opportunity for education. AACSB. https://www.aacsb.edu/insights/articles/2021/03/entrepreneurship-is-an-opportunity-for-education
Moore, J. C., & Fetzner, M. J. (2019). The road to retention: A closer look at institutions that achieve high course completion rates. Online Learning, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1650
Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
Namazkhan, M., Albers, C., & Steg, L. (2020). A decision tree method for explaining household gas consumption: The role of building characteristics, socio-demographic variables, psychological factors and household behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109542
Ng, C. (2019). Shifting the focus from motivated learners to motivating distributed environments: A review of 40 years of published motivation research in Distance Education. Distance Education, 40(4), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1681892
Nguyen, B. T. (2011). Face-to-face, blended, and online instruction: Comparison of student performance and retention in higher education [University of California, Davis]. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/123046/
Nungsari, M., Chin, J. W., Ngu, K., Abdullah, M. F. S., & Flanders, S. (2023). Dreams vs reality: Urban and rural female youth aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 23(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231177911
Nungsari, M., Ngu, K., Chin, J. W., & Flanders, S. (2021). The formation of youth entrepreneurial intention in an emerging economy: The interaction between psychological traits and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(2), 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2021-0312
Rahmani, A. M., Groot, W., & Rahmani, H. (2024). Dropout in online higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00450-9
Ray, A., Bala, P. K., & Dasgupta, S. A. (2019). Role of authenticity and perceived benefits of online courses on technology based career choice in India: A modified technology adoption model based on career theory. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.015
Reissová, A., Šimsová, J., Sonntag, R., & Kučerová, K. (2020). The influence of personal characteristics on entrepreneurial intentions: International comparison. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080402
Reynolds, P. D. (2000). National panel study of U.S. business startups: Background and methodology. In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth (Vol. 4, pp. 153–227). Emerald (MCB UP ). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-7540(00)04006-X
Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university-based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12021
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Revised edition). Wesleyan University Press.
Salceanu, C., Octavian, S. C., & Grigore, M. (2021). The impact of entrepreneurship education in developing soft skills for students from non-economic faculties. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov Series V Economic Sciences, 21(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.61801/OUAESS.2021.1.20
Song, Y., & Lu, Y. (2015). Decision tree methods: Applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 27(2), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044
Stephen, J. S., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., & Dubay, C. (2020). Persistence model of non-traditional online learners: Self-efficacy, self-regulation, and self-direction. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1745619
Stritto, M. E. D., Aguiar, N., & Andrews, C. (2023). From online learner readiness to life-long learning skills: A validation of the learning skills journey tool. Online Learning, 27(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.3880
Suretha, E., & Stanz, K. (2004). Locus of control and online learning. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v30i1.139
Toledo, I., Albornoz, C., & Schneider, K. (2020). Learning analytics to explore dropout in online entrepreneurship education. Psychology, 11, 266–284. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2020.112017
Trevelyan, R. (2011). Self-efficacy and effort in new venture development. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2011.17.1.2
Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What has been learned? Small Business Economics, 53(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0
Visser, L., Plomp, T., Amirault, R. J., & Kuiper, W. (2002). Motivating students at a distance: The case of an international audience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504998
Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self–efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x
Winarsunu, T., Azizaha, B. S. I., Fasikha, S. S., & Anwar, Z. (2023). Life skills training: Can it increases self esteem and reduces student anxiety? Heliyon, 9(4), e15232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15232
Ying, G., Maguire, M. G., Glynn, R. J., & Rosner, B. (2022). Tutorial on biostatistics: Receiver-operating characteristic (roc) analysis for correlated eye data. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 29(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2021.1921226
Yuan, C.-H., Wang, D., Hong, L., Zou, Y., & Wen, J. (2022). Coming back home to start up a business? A comparison between youth from rural and urban backgrounds in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962419
Zhang, W., Li, Y., Zeng, Q., Zhang, M., & Lu, X. (2022). Relationship between Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention Among college students: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912158
Zhu, M., Sari, A. R., & Lee, M. M. (2020). A comprehensive systematic review of MOOC research: Research techniques, topics, and trends from 2009 to 2019. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1685–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09798-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jia Wei Chin, Farhan, Sharon, Melati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

