Revisiting the Interrelationships Between Social and Cognitive Presences in Asynchronous Online Courses: Insights from Epistemic Network Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i3.4672Keywords:
community of inquiry, asynchronous online discussions, social presence, cognitive presence, epistemic network analysisAbstract
Asynchronous online discussions (AODs) are a critical component of online learning, enabling students to exchange ideas and interact with peers in a flexible manner. To explore the interrelationships between social presence and cognitive presence in AODs, and how these two presences are influenced across various instructional strategies used in AODs, this study involved twenty-two students from two fully online courses participating in the discussion boards, and their posts were coded and analyzed based on Community of Inquiry framework. Utilizing the Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) approach, this study uncovered the intricate connections and meanings behind students’ interactions and engagements in AODs. Results indicated that the exploration phase of cognitive presence exhibited the strongest connections with social presence indicators, particularly affective and interactive categories. These findings highlight the critical role of emotional and interactive engagement in cognitive development. Having compared the high-active and low-active classes, we concluded that the active-class exhibited a stronger sense of community and higher emotional engagement. Furthermore, a detailed week-by-week analysis showed that certain instructional strategies in AODs, particularly like debate and defense strategies, and personalized tasks, led to variations in student engagement and active participation. This study contributes to the practical implications for instructional designers and instructors to design a more engaging online course and facilitate AODs and advocates the benefits of using ENA in analyzing the discussion posts.
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3–4), Article 3–4. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1680
Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses?. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2), 1-21.
Armellini, A., & De Stefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the Community of Inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12302
Ba, S., Hu, X., Stein, D., & Liu, Q. (2023). Assessing cognitive presence in online inquiry‐based discussion through text classification and epistemic network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13285
Ba, S., Hu, X., Stein, D., & Liu, Q. (2024). Anatomizing online collaborative inquiry using directional epistemic network analysis and trajectory tracking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 2173-2191. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13441
Bowman, D., Swiecki, Z., Cai, Z., Wang, Y., Eagan, B., Linderoth, J., & Shaffer, D. W. (2021). The mathematical foundations of epistemic network analysis. In Advances in Quantitative Ethnography: Second International Conference Proceedings (pp. 91-105). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_7
Cakiroglu, U. (2020). Community of inquiry in web conferencing: Relationships between cognitive presence and academic achievements. Open Praxis, 11(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.767497790476183
Caskurlu, S., Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., & Kozan, K. (2021). The qualitative evidence behind the factors impacting online learning experiences as informed by the community of inquiry framework: A thematic synthesis. Computers & Education, 165, 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104111
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
Chen, C., Jones, K. T., & Xu, S. (2018). The association between students’ style of learning preferences, social presence, collaborative learning and learning outcomes. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.3
Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12243
Chesler, N. C., Ruis, A. R., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Arastoopour, G., & Williamson Shaffer, D. (2015). A novel paradigm for engineering education: Virtual internships with individualized mentoring and assessment of engineering thinking. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 137(024701). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029235
Choo, J., Bakir, N., Scagnoli, N. I., Ju, B., & Tong, X. (2020). Using the Community of Inquiry framework to understand students’ learning experience in online undergraduate business courses. TechTrends, 64, 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00444-9
Cornelisz, I., & van Klaveren, C. (2018). Student engagement with computerized practising: Ability, task value, and difficulty perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 828–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12292
Costley, J. (2019). The relationship between social presence and cognitive load. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2018-0107
Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D. W., & Fischer, F. (2018). When coding-and-counting is not enough: Using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z
Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x
DeNoyelles, A., Mannheimer Zydney, J., & Chen, B. (2014). Strategies for creating a community of inquiry through online asynchronous discussions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(1).
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
Elmoazen, R., Saqr, M., Hirsto, L., & Tedre, M. (2024). Capturing temporal pathways of collaborative roles: A multilayered analytical approach using community of inquiry. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09431-6
Fahy, P. J., Crawford, G., Ally, M., Cookson, P., Keller, V., & Prosser, F. (2000). The development and testing of a tool for analysis of computer-mediated conferencing transcripts. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 85–88.
Fathali, S. (2024). Social and cognitive presence in a community of inquiry: An epistemic network analysis of CALL students’ interactions via nowcomment. System, 121, 103233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103233
Fehrman, S., & Watson, S. L. (2021). A systematic review of asynchronous online discussions in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(3), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1858705
Ferreira, R., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., & Rolim, V. (2018). Towards combined network and text analytics of student discourse in online discussions. In C. Penstein Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, H. U. Hoppe, R. Luckin, M. Mavrikis, K. Porayska-Pomsta, B. McLaren, & B. Du Boulay (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (Vol. 10947, pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_9
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students' engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, Second Edition (pp. 352–355). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch052
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. (2015). Cognitive presence through social and teaching presence in communities of inquiry: A correlational-predictive study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 349-362. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.1666.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Wu, L., & Admiraal, W. (2021). The community of inquiry perspective on students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1479–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12586
Hammann, L. A., & Stevens, R. J. (2003). Instructional approaches to improving students' writing of compare-contrast essays: An experimental study. Journal of literacy research, 35(2), 731-756. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3502_3
Han, J., Jiang, Y., Mentzer, N., & Kelley, T. (2022). The role of sense of community and motivation in the collaborative learning: An examination of the first-year design course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1837–1852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09658-6
Holbeck, R., & Hartman, J. (2018). Efficient strategies for maximizing online student satisfaction: Applying technologies to increase cognitive presence, social presence, and teaching presence. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1199226
Iqbal, S., Swiecki, Z., Joksimovic, S., Ferreira Mello, R., Aljohani, N., Ul Hassan, S., & Gasevic, D. (2022). Uncovering associations between cognitive presence and speech acts: A network-based approach. LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506908
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
Kapur, M. (2011). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9109-9
Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2019). Posting patterns of students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in online learning. Online Learning, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1460
Kim, J. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01107.x
Kozan, K. (2016). A comparative structural equation modeling investigation of the relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence. Online Learning, 20(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i3.654
Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007
Lee, S.-M. (2014). The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.12.002
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018). Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education, 39(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476844
Maguire, R., Egan, A., Hyland, P., & Maguire, P. (2017). Engaging students emotionally: The role of emotional intelligence in predicting cognitive and affective engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1185396
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A meta-analysis on the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments. Online Learning, 26(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3), 276-282.
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
Morueta, R. T., López, P. M., Gómez, Á. H., & Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.004
Olesova, L., Slavin, M., & Lim, J. (2016). Exploring the effect of scripted roles on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Online Learning, 20(4), 34-53. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.1058
Pellas, N. (2017). An exploration of interrelationships among presence indicators of a community of inquiry in a 3D game-like environment for high school programming courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1127819
Popescu, E., & Badea, G. (2020). Exploring a community of inquiry supported by a social media-based learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 61-76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26921134
Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Vries, P. de, Hennis, T., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2018). Social presence in massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3370
Richardson, J. C., & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students’ level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.009
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2020). How can cognitive-science research help improve education? The case of comparing multiple strategies to improve mathematics learning and teaching. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(6), 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420969365
Rivera-Vargas, P., Anderson, T., & Cano, C. A. (2021). Exploring students’ learning experience in online education: analysis and improvement proposals based on the case of a Spanish open learning university. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3367-3389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10045-0
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J., Whighting, M., & Nisbet, D. (2016). The predictive relationship among the community of inquiry framework, perceived learning and online, and graduate students’ course grades in online synchronous and asynchronous courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2203
Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R. D., & Gǎsević, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.05.001
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l’ducation Distance, 14(2), 50–71.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Ruis, A. R., Siebert-Evenstone, A. L., Pozen, R., Eagan, B. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). Finding common ground: A method for measuring recent temporal context in analyses of complex, collaborative thinking. In K. Lund, G. Niccolai, E. Lavoué, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings: 13(th) International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2019: Vol. I (pp. 136–143)
Rupp, A. A., Gushta, M., Mislevy, R. J., & Shaffer, D. W. (2010). Evidence-centered design of ppistemic games: Measurement principles for complex learning environments. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 8(4), Article 4. https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1623
Saadatmand, M., Uhlin, L., Hedberg, M., Åbjörnsson, L., & Kvarnström, M. (2017). Examining learners’ interaction in an open online course through the community of inquiry framework. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0004
Sadaf, A., Wu, T., & Martin, F. (2021). Cognitive presence in online learning: A systematic review of empirical research from 2000 to 2019. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100050
Saqr, M., & López-Pernas, S. (2023). The temporal dynamics of online problem-based learning: Why and when sequence matters. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09385-1
Shaffer, D. W., Collier, W., & Ruis, A. R. (2016). A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: Analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.3
Shaffer, D., & Ruis, A. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gasevic (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). SOLAR, Society for Learning Analytics and Research. https://doi.org/10.18608/HLA17.015.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., ... & Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002
Siebert-Evenstone, A. L., Irgens, G. A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2017). In search of conversational grain size: Modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.43.7
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
Tan, Y., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., & Shaffer, D. (2024). Epistemic network analysis and ordered network analysis in learning analytics. In Learning Analytics Methods and Tutorials: A Practical Guide Using R (pp. 569-636). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54464-4_18
Tirado Morueta, R., Maraver López, P., Hernando Gómez, Á., & Harris, V. W. (2016). Exploring social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry to perform higher cognitive tasks. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.004
Wilson, E. C., & Berge, Z. L. (2023). Educational experience and instructional design effectiveness within the Community of Inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6751
Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2015). Students’ perceptions toward using classroom Debate to develop critical thinking and oral communication ability. Asian Social Science, 11(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p158
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Liu Dong, Chi-Jia Hsieh, Sunnie Lee Watson, Ji Hyun Yu, Victoria L. Lowell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
