Design of Interactive Spaces for Promoting Parental Involvement: Strategies Used by EFL Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4683Keywords:
Parental Involvement , online language teaching, digital screen mediation model, English teacher development, lesson design, English as a Foreign Language, social interactionsAbstract
This study investigated the strategies used by five Chinese EFL teachers in designing practices in utilization of digital tools and visuals for promoting parent-involved interactions in online language learning environments. Qualitative analysis of teacher interview transcripts, recorded videos, student artwork, and teacher–parent–student discourses on digital learning platforms and social media revealed six themes emerged regarding digital-screen-mediated design. The themes indicate that these designs such as using recorded videos to extend instructions and using assignment instructions to create collaborative meaning making environments, facilitates authentic communication and interactions among teachers, students, and parents. The mediation process extended beyond merely illustrating, sharing, or anchoring targeted visual content with parents and students; it also involved co-creation and co-construction of visuals on the screen. The emerging co-constructed learning structures aligned with five types of parent-involved interactive configurations. The findings of this study will assist EFL teachers to develop more effective instructional strategies in online or blended learning environments, particularly for young EFL learners.
References
Al-Mahrooqi, R., Denman, C., & Al-Maamari, F. (2016). Omani parents’ involvement in their children’s English education. SAGE Open, 6(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629190
Bang, H. J., & Mackey, A. (2024). Chinese parents’ involvement in their young children’s app-based language learning. Language Teaching for Young Learners. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00052.ban
Boivin N., Albakri, R. Yunus, Z.B.M., Mohammed, H., & Muniandy, N. (2014). Assessing emergent social and multiliteracy practices in urban Malaysian homes. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research 10(2), 34–54. https://meltajournals.com/index.php/majer/article/view/604
Borup, J. (2016). Teacher perceptions of learner-learner engagement at a cyber high school. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2361
Borup, J., Chambers, C., & Srimson, R. (2019). Online teacher and on-site facilitator perceptions of parental engagement at a supplemental virtual high school. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4237
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2013). The nature of parental interactions in an online charter school. American Journal of Distance Education, 27, 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.754271
Cheung, C. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2011). Parents' involvement in children's learning in the United States and China: implications for children's academic and emotional adjustment. Child Development, 82(3), 932–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01582.x
Chichón, J. L. E. (2022). Parental involvement in children’s (0–6-year-olds) EFL learning: Outlining practical proposals for improvement as part of student teachers’ training. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, (5).. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi.26179
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dailey-Hebert, A. (2018). Maximizing interactivity in online learning: Moving beyond discussion boards. The Journal of Educators Online, 15(3). https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2018_15_3/hebert_interactivity
Dao, P., Bui, T. L. D., Nguyen, D. T. T., & Nguyen, M. X. N. C. (2023). Synchronous online English language teaching for young learners: insights from public primary school teachers in an EFL context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, ,37(8), 2359–2388.. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2260429
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 301–316). Sage.
Gao, X. (2012). Parental strategies in supporting Chinese children’s learning of English vocabulary. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.602102
Ghajarieh, A., Mozaheb, M. A., Mohd Don, Z., & Mirkazemi, F. (2024). The socioeconomic status of parents and parental involvement in post-pandemic era: A longitudinal TEFL study in Iran. Applications of Language Studies, 2(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22034/jals.2024.713323
Gokturk, S., & Dinckal, S. (2018). Effective parental involvement in education: experiences and perceptions of Turkish teachers from private schools. Teachers and Teaching, 24(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1388777
Guo, D., Ramos, L.M. R., & Wang, F. (2014). Qualitative online interviews: Voices of applied linguistics researchers. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100130
Hakyemez, S. (2015). Turkish early childhood educators on parental involvement. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904114565152
Halommi, L., & Stevens, J. (2023). Quantifying the relationship between rarental involvement and English language proficiency among EFL learners. Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(4), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v1i4.21
Händel, M., Stephan, M., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kopp, B., Bedenlier, S., & Ziegler, A. (2020). Digital readiness and its effects on higher education students’ socio-emotional perceptions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1846147
Hasler-Waters, L., Menchaca, M. P., & Borup, J. (2014). Parental involvement in K-12 online and blended learning. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 303-323). ETC Press.
Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C. R. (2011). Strictly business: Teacher perceptions of interaction in virtual schooling. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(2). https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/726/1241
Heafner, T., & Handler, L.K. (2018). Online, hybrid, blended, and technology-mediated learning in social studies. In K. Kennedy & R.E. Ferdig (Eds.). Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (2nd ed., pp. 335-355). Carnegie Mellon University: ETC Press.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97(2), 310-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819509700202
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2005). The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement. Final performance report for the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (Grant No. R305T010673). http://www.vanderbilt.edu/pea-body/family-school/Reports.html
Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1-23. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/48543/
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Josselson, R. (2013). Interviewing for qualitative inquiry: A relational approach. Guilford Press.
Kalaycı, G. & Öz, H. (2018). Parental involvement in English language education: Understanding the parents’ perception. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(4), 832-847. https://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/447
Kalaycı, G., & Ergül, E. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the role of parental involvement in teaching English to young learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803608
Kirschner, P. A., & Kreijns, K. (2005). Enhancing sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. In R. Bromme, F. W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds) Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication: And how they may be overcome (pp. 169-191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24319-4_8
Kolyvas, S. (2020). Innovative and collaborative learning in visual arts with the use of modern educational software. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3612835
Lei, J., & Vibulphol, J. (2024). Teacher-parent collaboration for young EFL learners: A Thai teacher’s experiences. English Language Teaching, 17(8), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v17n8p39
Mahmoud, S. S. (2018). Saudi parents’ perceptions of the kind of help they offer to their primary school kids. English Language Teaching, 11(3), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n3p102
McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
McNeal Jr, R. B. (2014). Parent involvement, academic achievement and the role of student attitudes and behaviors as mediators. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 564-576. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1053945
McPake, J., Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2013). Pre-school children creating and communicating with digital technologies in the home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01323.x
Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Meskill, C. (2024). Digital screen mediation in education: Authentic and agentive technology practices for teaching and learning. Routledge.
Meskill, C., Sadykova, G., & Kayumova, A. (2020). Mediating digital screens with very young emerging bilinguals. Bilingual Research Journal, 43(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2020.1743383
Meskill, C., Guo, D., Wang, F., & Kusumastuti, W. (2024). How emergency remote online language teaching informed post-lockdown language teaching practices: The case of two Chinese EFL elementary teachers. In L. Oliveira and Y. Xu (Eds.), Pedagogies for equitable access: Reimagining multilingual education for an uncertain world. Information Age Publishers. https://www.infoagepub.com/products/Pedagogies-for-Equitable-Access
Meskill, C., Kusumastuti, W., Guo, D., Wang, F., Ramos, R.L.M. (2023). Emergency remote EFL instruction in Brazil, China, and Indonesia: What teachers learned and how. In Tafazoli, D., & Picard, M. (Eds.) Handbook of CALL teacher education and professional development. (pp. 137–155). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0514-0_9
Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldaňa, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed). Sage.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2020, April 6). Notice on work arrangements for primary and secondary schools’ “School is Out, but Class is On” (关于深入做好 中小学“停课不停学”工作的通知). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202003/t20200306_428342.html
Mullen, C., Pettigrew, J., Cronin, A., Rylands, L., & Shearman, D. (2021). The rapid move to online mathematics support: changes in pedagogy and social interaction. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 64-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1962555
Murshidi, G. A., Daoud, S., Derei, R. A., Alhamidi, H., Jabir, W., & Sayed, N. (2023). Parental involvement in English as foreign language learners’ education: Challenges and solutions in a post-pandemic era. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100297
Niehaus, K., & Adelson, J. L. (2014). School support, parental involvement, and academic and social-emotional outcomes for English language learners. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 810-844. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24546700
Offir, B., Lev, Y., Lev, Y., and Barth, I. (2001). Using interaction content analysis instruments to assess distance learning. Computers in the Schools, 18(2), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/j025v18n02_03
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The reality of online teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Patish, Y. (2016). The development of novice teachers’ culturally responsive classroom management practice. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/development-novice-teachers-culturally-responsive/docview/1804413962/se-2?accountid=14166
Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, and S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal process (pp. 110–134). Sage.
Ravitch, S.M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Sage.
Ryan, A. B. (1995). The family-school connection: Theory, research and practice. Sage.
Salmons, J. (2014). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design, and skills. Sage.
Sari, D. K., & Maningtyas, R. T. (2020, November). Parents’ involvement in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020) (pp. 94-97). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/assehr.k.201112.018
Stevens, M., & Borup, J. (2015). Parental engagement in online learning environments: A review of the literature. In M. F. Rice (Ed.) Exploring pedagogies for diverse learners online (Vol. 25, pp. 99–119). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720150000027005
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.
Tam, V. C., & Chan, R. M. (2010). Hong Kong parents’ perceptions and experiences of involvement in homework: A family capital and resource management perspective. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(3), 361–370.
https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jfamec/v31y2010i3p361-370.html
Tao, J. & Xu, Y. (2022). Parental support for young learners’ online learning of English in a Chinese primary school. System,105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102718
Tong, F., Zhang, H., Zhen, F., Irby, B. J., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2021). Supporting home literacy practices in promoting Chinese parents’ engagement in their children's English education in low-SES families: an experimental study. International Journal of Educational Research, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101816
Twiner, A., Coffin, C., Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2010). Multimodality, orchestration and participation in the context of classroom use of the interactive whiteboard: a discussion. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.491232
Wagner, E.D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.
Wati, S. (2015, November). Parental involvement and English language teaching to young learners: Parents’ experience in Aceh. International Conference on Teacher Training and Education, Surakarta, Indonesia. Sebelas Maret University.
Willis, L., & Exley, B. (2018). Using an online social media space to engage parents in student learning in the early years: Enablers and impediments. Digital Education Review, 33, 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2018.33.87-104
Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. (6th edition). Sage.
Zhou, L., & Li, F. (2020). A review of the largest online teaching in China for elementary and middle school students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 5(1). 549-567. http://doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.re040.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dongni Guo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

