Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities Student Perspectives on AI in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Study of Usage, Ethics, and Future Intentions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i1.4989Keywords:
artificial intelligence, higher education, student perceptions, academic integrity, privacy concerns, technology adoption, social sciences educationAbstract
This study investigates social science students’ perceptions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education at Sultan Qaboos University. Drawing on the Theory of Reasoned Action, the research examines factors influencing AI adoption among students, including usage patterns, awareness levels, privacy concerns, and academic integrity considerations. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire from 255 students across various social science departments. The study employed regression analysis to test two models: factors influencing attitudes toward AI and determinants of behavioral intentions to use AI. Results reveal that AI tool usage (β = .423, p < .001) and awareness (β = .198, p = .001) significantly predict positive attitudes toward AI. Contrary to previous research, privacy concerns positively correlated with favorable AI attitudes (β = .170, p = .011). Students strongly support AI integration in education for improving efficiency (mean = 3.90) and work quality (mean = 3.67), while expressing the need for clear regulatory frameworks (mean = 3.78). The findings highlight a gap between AI usage and comprehensive understanding, suggesting the need for structured AI literacy programs. The study contributes to understanding AI adoption in higher education and provides recommendations for policy development that balances technological innovation with academic integrity and ethical considerations.
References
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Huamaní Jordan, O., López Roca, C., & Saavedra Tirado, K. (2024). Analysis of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: Effect of intent to use, verification of information and responsible use. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01764-z
Al-Bukhrani, M. A., Alrefaee, Y. M. H., & Tawfik, M. (2025). Adoption of AI writing tools among academic researchers: A Theory of Reasoned Action approach. PLOS ONE, 20(1), e0313837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313837
Al-Maskri, M., Al-Mukhini, S., & Amzat, I. H. (2012). Improving education system in Oman through school curriculum, teaching methods and evaluation: What is needed? OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(10), 39–60. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2047736
Al-Suqri, M. N., & Al-Kharusi, R. M. (2015). Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action (TRA) (1980). In Information seeking behavior and technology adoption: Theories and trends (pp. 188–204). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch012
Al-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
Allam, A. H., Eltewacy, N. K., Alabdallat, Y. J., Owais, T. A., Salman, S., & Ebada, M. A. (2024). Knowledge, attitude, and perception of Arab medical students towards artificial intelligence in medicine and radiology: A multi-national cross-sectional study. European Radiology, 34(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10509-2
Almaiah, M. A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Hajjej, F., Thabit, S., El-Qirem, F. A., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Al Mulhem, A., & Al-Maroof, R. S. (2024). Examining the impact of artificial intelligence and social and computer anxiety in e-learning settings: Students’ perceptions at the university level. Electronics, 13(7), 1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223662
Almaraz-López, C., Almaraz-Menéndez, F., & López-Esteban, C. (2023). Comparative study of the attitudes and perceptions of university students in business administration and management and in education toward artificial intelligence. Education Sciences, 13(6), 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060609
Alneyadi, S., Wardat, Y., Alshannag, Q., & Abu-Al-Aish, A. (2023). The effect of using smart e-learning app on the academic achievement of eighth-grade students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), em2248. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13067
Alshammari, S. H., & Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2025). An integrated approach using social support theory and technology acceptance model to investigate the sustainable use of digital learning technologies. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83450-z
Alzadjali, A. H. H. (2019). Policies and initiatives for the internationalization of higher education in Oman. In Policies and initiatives for the internationalization of higher education (pp. 12–31). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5231-4.ch002
Alzahrani, L. (2023). Analyzing students’ attitudes and behavior toward artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 11(6), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.F7475.0311623
Ayasrah, F., Alarabi, K., Mansouri, M., Fattah, H., & Al-Said, K. (2024). Enhancing secondary school students’ attitudes toward physics by using computer simulations. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 369–380. https://doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.017
BestColleges. (2024). 56% of college students have used AI on assignments or exams. BestColleges Research. https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/most-college-students-have-used-ai-survey/
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Brooks, C. D., & Grajek, S. (2020). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2021/4/2021hrteachinglearning.pdf
Buabbas, A. J., Miskin, B., Alnaqi, A. A., Ayed, A. K., Shehab, A. A., Syed-Abdul, S., & Uddin, M. (2023). Investigating students’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence in medical education. Healthcare, 11(9), 1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11091298
Cabero-Almenara, J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2024). Teachers’ digital competence and artificial intelligence: A review study and future research. Computers & Education, 215, 105040. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13151
Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted writing: Developing AI literacy for the AI age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231176517
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4
Chronicle of Higher Education. (2024, March 15). How are students really using AI? The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/how-are-students-really-using-ai
Dienlin, T., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2023). A longitudinal analysis of the privacy paradox. New Media & Society, 25(5), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211016316
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., & Ahuja, M. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Harry, A., & Sayudin, S. (2023). Role of AI in education. Interdisciplinary Journal and Humanity (INJURITY), 2(3), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., & Bittencourt, I. I. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Jia, X.-H., & Tu, J.-C. (2024). Towards a new conceptual model of AI-enhanced learning for college students: The roles of artificial intelligence capabilities, general self-efficacy, learning motivation, and critical thinking awareness. Systems, 12(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030074
Katsantonis, A., & Katsantonis, I. G. (2024). University students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence: An exploratory study of the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural dimensions of AI attitudes. Education Sciences, 14(9), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090988
Kiemde, S. M. A., & Kora, A. D. (2022). Towards an ethics of AI in Africa: Rule of education. AI and Ethics, 2(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00106-8
Kim, J., Ham, Y., & Lee, S.-S. (2024). Differences in student-AI interaction process on a drawing task: Focusing on students’ attitude towards AI and the level of drawing skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8859
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kim, J. J., Soh, J., Kadkol, S., Solomon, I., Yeh, H., Srivatsa, A. V., Leow, A. D., Langenecker, S. A., Garnett, M. F., & Ajilore, O. (2025). AI anxiety: A comprehensive analysis of psychological factors and interventions. AI and Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00686-9
Kochis, M., Parsons, M. Q., Rothman, D., Petrusa, E., & Phitayakorn, R. (2024). Medical students’ perceptions and use of educational technologies and artificial intelligence chatbots as educational resources. Global Surgical Education—Journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-024-00292-z
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Meyerheim, M., Raupach, T., & Mergen, M. (2024). Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: A cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05400-7
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
Li, W., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yang, X., Li, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K-12 level: An extension of the classic TAM model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 13922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64363-3
Ma, J., Wang, P., Li, B., Wang, T., Pang, X. S., & Wang, D. (2025). Exploring user adoption of ChatGPT: A technology acceptance model perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1431–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2314358
Macaulay, T. (2020, November 20). Study: Only 18% of data science students are learning about AI ethics. The Next Web. https://thenextweb.com/news/study-only-18-of-data-scientists-are-learning-about-ai-ethics
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Schiff, D. (2022). Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 527–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2
Shehata, A., & Alnadabi, K. (2022). Factors affecting undergraduate students’ information sharing behaviour when dealing with COVID-19 misinformation: The theory of reasoned action. Information Research, 27(Special issue). https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2221
Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118
Skulmowski, A. (2025). Informed consent in educational AI research needs to be transparent, flexible, and dynamic. Mind, Brain, and Education, 19(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12435
Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Henao-Rodríguez, C., Lis-Gutiérrez, J. P., & Palomino-Gámez, S. (2024). Importance of university students’ perception of adoption and training in artificial intelligence tools. Societies, 14(8), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080141
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
Von Garrel, J., & Mayer, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in studies—Use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7
Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: Insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 621. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y
Wells, C., Kolek, E., Williams, E., & Saunders, D. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
White, J. D. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of AI. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/sponsored/2023/11/academic-integrity-in-the-age-of-ai
Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in higher education: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Chan, C. (2024). Unveiling students’ experiences and perceptions of artificial intelligence usage in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/xzjprb23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmed Shehata, Naifa Bait Bin Saleem, Faten Hamad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

