Teacher perspectives on challenges and opportunities for immersive virtual reality learning integration in Australian schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i3.5154Keywords:
Australian schools, educational technology adoption, immersive virtual reality (iVR), K-12 education, pedagogical integration, professional learning, teacher perspectivesAbstract
The impact of using immersive virtual reality (iVR) technologies is well known across the recreational gaming, training, and healthcare sectors. However, iVR’s trajectory into education, especially across schooling contexts, is less known and at an early adoption phase. Only a few studies have deeply interrogated the teacher perspective on the benefits of iVR or how it is positioned pedagogically alongside curriculum as a powerful digital learning technology. This article reports on an exploratory descriptive survey of 66 Australian school teachers, two-thirds of whom had experience using iVR in classroom. The survey combined closed- and open-ended questions to elicit teachers’ demographic and professional profiles, technical choices, pedagogical applications, perceived benefits, barriers to use, and professional learning needs. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to compare the perspectives of iVR users and non-users. Findings reveal that early adopters demonstrated innovative pedagogical applications and a strong emphasis on student engagement, while non-users cited cost, access, and curriculum alignment as key barriers. The study provides valuable insights into the enablers and constraints of iVR integration and contributes evidence to inform professional learning, policy development, and scaling strategies in Australian schools.
References
Abdelazim, A., Al Breiki, M., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2025). AI in education: The mediating role of perceived trust in adoption decisions of school leaders. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13596-4
Açıkgül, K., & Şad, S. N. (2020). Mobile technology acceptance scale for learning mathematics: Development, validity, and reliability studies. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), 21(4), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4834
Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017
Beck, D., Morgado, L., & O'Shea, P. (2023). Educational practices and strategies with immersive learning environments: Mapping of reviews for using the Metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3243946
Boel, C., Rotsaert, T., Valcke, M., Rosseel, Y., Struyf, D., & Schellens, T. (2023). Are teachers ready to immerse? Acceptance of mobile immersive virtual reality in secondary education teachers. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2855
Bower, M., DeWitt, D., & Lai, J. W. (2020). Reasons associated with preservice teachers’ intention to use immersive virtual reality in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2215-2233. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13009
Conrad, M., Kablitz, D., & Schumann, S. (2024). Learning effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in education and training: A systematic review of findings. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100053
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Di Natale, A. F., Repetto, C., Riva, G., & Villani, D. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A 10‐year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2006–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
Fu, Y., Hu, Y., & Sundstedt, V. (2022). A systematic literature review of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality game applications in healthcare. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare (HEALTH), 3(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472303
Geriş, A., & Kulaksız, T. (2025). Predicting teachers’ intentions to use virtual reality in education: A study based on the UTAUT-2 framework. Research in Learning Technology, 33. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v33.3429
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Grau, O. (2004). Virtual art: From illusion to immersion. MIT Press.
Khukalenko, I. S., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., An, Y., & Iushina, V. D. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of using virtual reality technology in classrooms: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11591-11613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11061-0
Lampropoulos, G., & Kinshuk. (2024). Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1691–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3
Lee, M. J. W., Georgieva, M., Alexander, B., Craig, E., & Richter, J. (2000). The state of XR and immersive learning outlook report: 2020 edition. Immersive Learning Research Network. https://pure.bond.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/37516351/State_of_XR_Outlook_Report_Executive_Summary.pdf
Liu, C., Meng, S., Zheng, W., & Zhou, Z. (2025). Research on the impact of immersive virtual reality classroom on student experience and concentration. Virtual Reality, 29, 82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01153-w
Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in K–12 education: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210
MacGill, B., & Unsworth, P. (2022). Media arts in an education: A culturally responsive approach for developing digital and media literacies. In D. Price, B., MacGill, B., & J Carter (Eds) Arts-based practices with young people at the edge. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04345-1_6
Mystakidis, S., & Christopoulos, A. (2022). Teacher perceptions on virtual reality escape rooms for stem education. Information, 13(3), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030136
OECD. (2024). Virtual reality and its opportunities and risks, in OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024 (Volume 1): Embracing the technology frontier. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a94253ae-en.
Pellas, N., Mystakidis, S., & Kazanidis, I. (2021). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and Higher Education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Reality, 25, 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00489-9
Rauschnabel, P. A., Felix, R., Hinsch, C., Shahab, H., & Alt, F. (2022). What is XR? Towards a framework for augmented and virtual reality. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107289
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.
Schott, C., Milligan, A., & Marshall, S. (2024). Immersive VR for K-12 experiential education–proposing a pedagogies, practicalities, and perspectives informed framework. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100068
Scorgie, D., Feng, Z., Paes, D., Parisi, F., Yiu, T. W., & Lovreglio, R. (2024). Virtual reality for safety training: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Safety Science, 171, 106372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106372
Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(74). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
Southgate, E. (2020). Virtual reality in curriculum and pedagogy: Evidence from secondary classrooms. Routledge.
Southgate, E. (2023). Teachers facilitating student virtual reality content creation: Conceptual, curriculum, and pedagogical insights. In P. MacDowell, & J. Lock, J. (Eds.). Immersive education: Designing for learning (pp. 189-204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18138-2
Southgate, E., Maddock, T., Camporeale, E., & Burgess, R. (2026). Ethical issues with extended reality technology in schools and how teachers can respond to these in STEM education. In L. Leite, L. Dourdo, A. S. Afonso, S. Morgado, & L. Carvalho (Eds.), Practical work in science education in the digital era: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 407-419). Springer.
Statistica. (n.d.). AR and VR – worldwide. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/ar-vr/worldwide
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984249
Stenberdt, V. A., & Makransky, G. (2023). Mastery experiences in immersive virtual reality promote pro-environmental waste-sorting behavior. Computers & Education, 198, 104760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104760
Steele, P. B., Burleigh, C., & Young, E. A. (2020). Considering educators' perceptions of ethics and safety in virtual learning environments (VLEs). Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2020.10.1.26
Stranger-Johannessen, E., & Fjørtoft, S. O. (2021). Implementing virtual reality in K-12 classrooms: Lessons learned from early adopters. In V. L. Uskov, R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.), International KES Conference on Smart Education and Smart E-Learning (pp. 139–148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2834-4_12
Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wei, X., Chen, Y., Zhao, P., Wang, L., Lee, L. K., & Liu, R. (2025). Effects of immersive virtual reality on primary students’ science performance in classroom settings: A generative AI pedagogical agents-enhanced 5E approach. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2514101
Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-55. http://www.imrjournal.org/uploads/1/4/2/8/14286482/imr-v15n1art4.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erica Southgate , Paul Unsworth, Matt Bower , James Birt , Dara Tafazoli, Michael A. Cowling

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

