Mapping evidence on persistence and retention strategies for non-traditional students in online higher education: A scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30iSI2.5764Keywords:
Non-traditional students, online higher education, persistence and retention, scoping review, conceptualization and measurement, institutional practices, adult learnerAbstract
Non-traditional learners, often balancing employment, caregiving, and academic responsibilities, now constitute a growing majority of students in higher education (National Center for Education Statistics, 2024). Although their persistence and retention are central to institutional effectiveness, the evidence base informing institutional responses remains fragmented and unevenly conceptualized. Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework for scoping reviews, this study synthesized empirical and conceptual literature published between 2013 and 2025 to map how persistence and retention among non-traditional students are defined, examined, and measured in online higher education (Hadie, 2024). Findings indicate a strong reliance on age- and employment-based definitions of non-traditional status, frequent use of composite outcome measures centered on persistence and institutional retention, and limited differentiation between student-level continuation and institution-level metrics. Analysis identified five interrelated thematic domains spanning instructional, learner, and institutional levels, with an emergent emphasis on technology- and AI-mediated practices. By producing a comprehensive evidence map, this review clarifies dominant patterns, methodological tendencies, and persistent gaps in the literature, offering direction for future research and institutional practice aimed at advancing educational equity and student success in online higher education.
Keywords: Non-traditional students; online higher education; persistence and retention; scoping review; conceptualization and measurement; institutional practices; adult learners
References
hyper-competitive environment. International Society for Technology, Education, and Science.
Aversa, E., & MacCall, S. (2013). Profiles in retention part 1: Design characteristics of a graduate synchronous online program. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 54(2), 147–161. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43686942
Banerjee, M., & Zhang, H. (2024). Determining the influence of learner characteristics on online course success for underserved students in higher education. Journal of Educators Online, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2024.21.3.1
Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—A literature review. Sage Open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777
Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485-540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485
Beattie, E. (2022). The power of the positive: Enhancing online student engagement for adult literacy learners. Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy, 4(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.35847/ebeattie.4.1.20
Bedford, L. (2023). Supporting online graduate students through the perspective of the affective filter hypothesis: A multiple case study of faculty interactions with students. Journal of Online Graduate Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.65201/001c.141601
Belt, E. S., Friesen, N., Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2025). Teacher–student relationships in an online graduate program: A phenomenological analysis. Online Learning, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i3.4604
Bourdeaux, R., & Schoenack, L. (2016). Adult student expectations and experiences in an online learning environment. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2016.1229072
Brown, C. G. (2017). The persistence and attrition of online learners. School Leadership Review, 12(1), 47–58. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/
Burke, C. M. (2020). Retention of women in online education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 20(4), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrde-07-2020-0002
Cato Parnell, M. A. (2022). Perceptions of higher education online students and faculty regarding attrition in online courses (Order No. 29213827) [Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/perceptions-higher-education-online-students/docview/2679598848/se-2
Chaffin, K. M., & Shatila, S. (2023). The case for online education: Success factors in an MSW program through a critical feminist lens. Social Work Education, 43(7), 1812–1830. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2221992
Choi, H. J., & Park, J.-H. (2018). Testing a path-analytic model of adult dropout in online degree programs. Computers & Education, 116, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.005
Cordano, V. (2025). Navigating online horizons: Fully online experiences of adult returning students at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa. International Education Journal Comparative Perspective. https://doi.org/10.70830/iejcp.2402.19865
Cross, T. M. (2013). Staying the course: Grit, academic success, and non-traditional doctoral students (Order No. 3587687) [Pepperdine University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/staying-course-grit-academic-success-non/docview/1427344572/se-2
Dello Stritto, M. E., Skinner, D., Aguiar, N. R., & Underhill, G. R. (2025). Financial aid matters: The relationship among financial aid, retention, and graduation rates in online students. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1866
De Paepe, L., Zhu, C., & DePryck, K. (2018). Drop-out, retention, satisfaction and attainment of online learners of Dutch in adult education. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(3), 303–323. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/174173/
Dumais, S. A., Rizzuto, T. E., Cleary, J., & Dowden, L. (2013). Stressors and supports for adult online learners: Comparing first- and continuing-generation college students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.783265
Ellis, H. (2019). Pursuing the conundrum of non-traditional student attrition and persistence: A follow-up study. College Student Journal, 53(4), 439–449. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A612581075/AONE?u=anon~e08a31a4&sid=googleScholar&xid=6b1669af
Gaytan, J. (2013). Factors affecting student retention in online courses: Overcoming this critical problem. Career and Technical Education Research, 38(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.5328/cter38.2.147
Gullixson, A. (2015). Rethinking retention: Using engagement to increase adult distance learner persistence. University Digital Conservancy. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/175446
Hadie, S. N. H. (2024). ABC of a scoping review: A simplified JBI scoping review guideline. Education in Medicine Journal, 16(2), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2024.16.2.14
Haydarov, R., Moxley, V., & Anderson, D. (2013). Counting chickens before they are hatched: An examination of student retention, graduation, attrition, and dropout measurement validity in an online master’s environment. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 14(4), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.14.4.a
Jiang, M., & Koo, K. (2020). Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students. Online Learning, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2307
Kara, M., Erdoğdu, F., Kokoç, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2019). Challenges faced by adult learners in online distance education: A Literature Review. Open Praxis, 11(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.929
Kish, D. (2025). Recommendations and best practices to increase online student retention. Journal of Educators Online, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2025.22.4.9
Layne, M., Boston, W. E., & Ice, P. (2013). A longitudinal study of online learners: Shoppers, swirlers, stoppers, and succeeders as a function of demographic characteristics. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(2), 15–25.
Lehan, T. J., Hussey, H. D., & Shriner, M. (2018). The influence of academic coaching on persistence in online graduate students. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 26(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2018.1511949
Louie, Y. (2024). Successful online adult learners’ motivation for persistence to graduation (Order No. 31633836) [Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/successful-online-adult-learners-motivation/docview/3121559190/se-2
McClendon, C., Neugebauer, R. M., & King, A. (2017). Growth mindset, and deliberate practice in online learning. Journal of Instructional Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2017.2
McNeil, S. G., Ahlf, M., & Ford, C. D. (2025). Exploring nontraditional graduate students' online engagement: an instrumental case study of learners' perceptions of purposefully designed activities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00549-7
Motte, K. (2020). The intersection of stakeholder, educator, and community support for distance education doctoral education students. Journal of Online Graduate Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.65201/001c.141630
National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Non-traditional undergraduates/ definitions and data. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs/web/97578e.asp
Oregon, E., McCoy, L., & Carmon-Johnson, L. (2018). Case analysis: Exploring the application of using rich media technologies and social presence to decrease attrition in an online graduate program. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.2.7
Preuss, M. D., Bennett, P. J., Renner, B. J., & Wanstreet, C. E. (2023). The factors influencing retention of online adult learners: A case study of a private institution. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3005
Ranasinghe, K., Fernando, T. L. D., Vineeshiya, N., & Fernando, G. W. A. R. (2025). Improving student persistence in open and distance learning; An investigation of demotivational challenges. Open Praxis, 17(4), 648–663. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.4.850
Rosser-Majors, M. L., Rebeor, S., McMahon, C., Wilson, A., Stubbs, S. L., Harper, Y., & Sliwinski, L. (2022). Improving retention factors and student success online utilizing the Community of Inquiry framework’s instructor presence model. Online Learning, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i2.2731
Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(02)00158-6
Seery, K., Barreda, A., Hein, S., & Hiller, J. (2021). Retention strategies for online students: A systematic literature review. Journal of Global Education and Research, 5(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.5038/2577-509x.5.1.1105
Shatila, S. L. (2023). Not alone when I’m feeling stressed: Online adult learner connection and retention. Adult Education Quarterly, 74(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136231184570
Stephen, J. S. (2022). Persistence of non-traditional undergraduate online students: Towards a contemporary conceptual framework. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 29(2), 438–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714221142908
Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and ‘teacher-presence’: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59, 146–169.
Su, J., & Waugh, M. L. (2018). Online student persistence or attrition: Observations related to expectations, preferences, and outcomes. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 16(1), 63–79.
Sutton, R. (2014). Unlearning the past: New foundations for online student retention. The Journal of Educators Online, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2014.3.5
Swartzwelder, K., Murphy, J., & Myers, J. (2023). Factors influencing student persistence in online courses during the pandemic: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educators Online, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2023.20.2.12
Sylvester, J. (2025). Navigating the journey of non-traditional women in online higher education: A narrative inquiry (Publication No. 32114090) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/navigating-journey-nontraditional-women-online/docview/3223079889/se-2
Tolouian, A., Wholeben, M., & Rankin, D. (2022). Student retention and success in an RN-BSN program: Determining variables and methods. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v9no2a107
Trespalacios, J., & Uribe-Florez, L. J. (2020). Developing Online Sense of Community: Graduate Students' Experiences and Perceptions. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690340
Walsh, C., Bragg, L., Heyres, M., Yap, A., & Ratcliff, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of online academic student support in higher education. Online Learning, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3954
Yoo, S. J., & Huang, W. D. (2013). Engaging online adult learners in higher education: Motivational factors impacted by gender, age, and prior experiences. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(3), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2013.836823
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jessica Sylvester, Ed.D, Melinda Kulick, Ed.D

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

