“When We Talk About Compliance, It’s Because We Lived It” - Online Educators’ Roles in Supporting Students with Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i5.581Keywords:
K-12 students with disabilities, educators' roles, disability supportAbstract
As participation in online learning grows, so do concerns around the ways in which students with disabilities are served in virtual school programs, both full and part-time. At the crux of this struggle is the way in which federal and state laws (many of which were incepted before online learning existed or gained traction as an educational option) are interpreted by educators and translated into policies at the school level. Further, administrators, special education case managers, and teachers all interpret school level policies and answer to directives from a hierarchy of supervisors. The interpretations of these policies and the understandings educators use to guide their thinking have not been well-researched. In the present study, teachers, special education case managers, school level special education administrators, and regional directors were interviewed about their roles in developing, supporting, and implementing accommodations and other forms of support for students with disabilities in online courses. Findings from this work focus on the role conceptions of various types of educators in virtual schools and the tensions they experience as they work to support each other in positioning students with disabilities for success.References
Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A. J. Z., & Marcia, J. E. (2000). Coded semistructured interviews in social psychological research. In H.T. Reis & C.M. Judd (Eds.). Handbook of Research Methods in Social Psychology (pp. 286-312). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Berg, B.L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bernstein, M. (2013). Whose choice are we talking about: the exclusion of students with disabilities from for-profit online charter schools. Richmond Journal of Law in the Public Interest, 16(3), 487-525.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bullingham, L., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2013). ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities. Journal of Information Science, 39(1), 101-112.
Burnham, P., Gilland, K., Grant, W., & Layton-Henry, Z. (2004). Research in methods in politics. Basingstroke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Carnahan, C., & Fulton, L. (2013). Virtually forgotten: special education students in cyber schools. TechTrends, 57(4), 46-52.
Compton, L. K. L., Davis, N., & Mackey, J. (2009). Field experience in virtual schools—to be there virtually. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 459-477.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) standards for school leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Crawford, L., & Ketterlin-Geller, L. R. (2013). Middle school teachers’ assignment of test accommodations. The Teacher Educator, 48(1), 29-45.
Davis, N. (2011). Leadership for online learning within and across secondary schools: an ecological perspective on change theories. Retrieved from http:// www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/afluck/ifipwg3-3/Activities/Nashville11/Papers/wg332011_submission_1.doc.
Davis, N. E., & Rose, R. (2007). Professional development for virtual schooling and online learning. Vienna, VA: NACOL.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). Collective rationality in organizational settings. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Feldman, M. S. (Ed.). (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data (Vol. 33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: from neutral stance to political involvement. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3, 695-728.
Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 454-473.
Glass, G. V & Welner, K.G. (2011). Online K-12 schooling in the U.S.: uncertain private ventures in need of public regulation. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/online-k-12-schooling.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C § 1400 et seq.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, P.L. 105-17, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kaufman, A. K., & Blewett, E. (2012). When good enough is no longer good enough: how the high stakes nature of the No Child Left Behind Act supplanted the Rowley definition of a free appropriate public education. Journal of Law & Education, 41(1), 5-25.
Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering preservice teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: a national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185-200.
Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Alonzo, J., Braun-Monegan, J., & Tindal, G. (2007). Recommendations for accommodations implications of (in)consistency. Remedial and Special Education, 28(4), 194-206.
King, N. (2004). Using interviews in qualitative research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.) Essential Guide to Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage.
LaFrance, J. A., & Beck, D. (2014). Mapping the terrain: educational leadership field experiences in K-12 virtual schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 160-189.
Levene, J. & Boulware, D.D. (2014). Sustaining innovation through online professional development: a design approach. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (pp. 2901-2906). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Lilleker, D. G. (2003). Interviewing the political elite: navigating a potential minefield. Politics, 23(3), 207-214.
Lindoff, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (1995). Qualitative communications research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71-85.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McLeskey, J. (2011). Supporting improved practice for special education teachers: the importance of learner-centered professional development. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24(1), 26-35.
Mellard, D. F., Deshler, D. D., & Barth, A. (2004). LD identification: it’s not simply a matter of building a better mousetrap. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(4), 229-242.
Noddings, N. (2013). Education and democracy in the 21st century. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Pajak, E. F. (2012). Willard Waller’s Sociology of Teaching reconsidered: “what does teaching do to teachers?†American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1182-1213.
Richardson, L., & St Pierre, E. A. (2008). Writing: a method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research 3rd ed. (pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schaefer, L., Downey, C. A., & Clandinin, D. J. (2014). Narrative conceptions of knowledge: towards understanding teacher attrition. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, R., & Rapp, C. (2013). Keeping pace with K-12 online and blended learning: a guide to policy and practice. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/reports/
Zirkel, P. A. (2013). Is it time for elevating the standard for FAPE under IDEA? Exceptional Children, 79(4), 497-508.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
