An Examination of an Online Tutoring Program’s Impact on Low-Achieving Middle School Students’ Mathematics Achievement

Shanan Chappell, Pamela Arnold, John Nunnery, Melva Grant

Abstract


The purpose of this mixed methods study was to determine the impact of synchronous online tutoring services on struggling middle school students’ mathematics achievement. The online tutoring was provided as a response to intervention (RTI) Tier 3 support (intensive, individualized intervention) in schools implementing a school-wide mathematics program that addresses Tier 1 (high-quality classroom instruction) and Tier 2 (small group interventions). We employed quasi-experimental, within- and between-group designs to examine impacts for 119 students in two schools to measure the tutoring’s impact on mathematics assessment scores. We also conducted qualitative analyses of student and tutor postsession commentary. The findings suggest that the tutoring contributed to statistically significant gains in student assessment scores postintervention. Online tutors’ descriptions of their practice centered on ongoing progress monitoring of student learning, delivery of guided practice to students, the use of multiple explanations and representations of target concepts. Student perceptions of the online tutoring were predominately positive in nature.

Keywords


Mathematics; online tutoring; middle school

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, J., Rieg, S., Clendaniel, T. (2006). An investigation of an after school math tutoring

program: University tutors + elementary students = a successful partnership. Education, 127(2), 287-293.

Beal, C., Walles, R., Arroyo, I., & Woolf, B. (2007). On-line tutoring for math achievement

testing: A controlled evaluation. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 43-55.

Bray, M. (1999). The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and Its Implications for Planners. Fundamentals of Educational Planning Series, Number 61. Paper presented at the United Nations Educational, Scientific Cultural Organization, Paris International Inst for Educational Planning.

Bray, T. M. (2011). The challenge of shadow education: Private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in the European Union (pp. 1-78). European Commission.

Burns, M. K., Senesac, B. V., & Symington, T. (2003). The effectiveness of the hosts program in improving the reading achievement of children atâ€risk for reading failure. Literacy Research and Instruction, 43(2), 87-103.

Carnegie Learning. (2002). Results from Moore, OK. Cognitive Tutor Research Report OK-01-

Pittsburgh, PA.

Chappell, S., Nunnery, J., Pribesh, S., & Hager, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of Supplemental

Educational Services (SES) provider effects on student achievement. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 16, 1-23.

Charalambos, C.Y., Hill, H.C. & Ball, D.L. (2011). Prospective teachers’ learning to provide instructional explanations: how does it look and what might it take? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 441-463.

Clark, A. & Whetstone, P. (2014). The impact of an online tutoring program on mathematics

achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(6), 462-466.

Cohen, P., Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis

of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237-248.

Donnelly, R. (2013). The role of the PBL tutor within blended academic development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 133-143.

eSchool News. (2009). Online tutoring program enhances students’ skills. Retrieved online from

http://www.eschoolnews.com/2009/06/08/online-tutoring-program-enhances-students-skills

Fashola, O. (1998). Building effective afterschool programs. Thousand Oaks, CA:

Corwin Press.

Fuchs, L.S., Powell, S.R., Seethaler, P.M., Cirina, P.T., Fletcher, J.M., Fuchs, D. & Hamlett, C.L. (2011). The development of arithmetic and word-problem skill among students with mathematics disability. In J. M. Kauffman, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education (pp. 703-715). New York: Routledge.

Gordon, E. (2003). Looking beyond the stereotypes: Ensuring the true potential of

tutoring. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(6), 456-459.

Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Oliver, A., & Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Huang, M. H. (2013). After-school tutoring and the distribution of student performance. Comparative Education Review, 57(4), 689-710.

Koerwer, S. (2007). ThinkingStorm: The ABCs of online tutoring. Information Today,

July/August 2007.

Kulik, J.A. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary

schools: What controlled evaluation studies say. SRI project Number P10446.001. Arlington, VA: SRI International.

Leedy, P. & Ormrod, J. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design (9th ed.). Upper Saddle

River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Maloy, R., Razzaq, L., & Edwards, S. (2014). Learning by choosing: Fourth graders use of an

online multimedia tutoring system for math problem solving. Journal of Interactive

Learning Research, 25(1), 51-64.

Midgley, C., Anderman, E., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 90-113.

Morris, S. & DeShon, R. (2002). Combining effect-size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated

measures and independent-group designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125.

Nguyen, D. & Kulm, G. (2005). Using web-based practice to enhance mathematics learning and

achievement. Journal of Interactive On-line Learning, 3, 1-16.

Nunnery, J., Chappell, S., & Arnold, P. (2013). A meta-analysis of a cooperative learning model’s effects on student achievement in mathematics. Cypriot journal of educational sciences, 8(1), 34-38.

O’Connor, R.E. & Sanchez, V. (2011). Responsiveness to intervention models for reducing reading difficulties and identifying learning disability. In J. M. Kauffman, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education (pp. 703-715). New York: Routledge.

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ritter, G., Barnett, J., Denny, G., & Albin, G. (2009). The effectiveness of volunteer

tutoring programs for elementary and middle school students: A meta-analysis.

Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 3-38.

Rothman, T., & Henderson, M. (2011). Do school-based tutoring programs significantly improve student performance on standardized tests? RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education, 34(6), 1-10.

Sanderson, D. (2003). Setting up a successful after school tutorial program: One district's

journey. Reading Improvement, 40(1), 13-20.

Shenton, A.K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Topping, K. (2000). Tutoring. Brussels, Belgium: International Academy of Education.

Vasquez III, E. & Slocum, T. (2012). Evaluation of synchronous online tutoring for students at

risk of reading failure. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 221-235.

Virginia Department of Education. (2012). Virginia Standard of Learning Assessments:

Technical report. 2011-2012 Administration cycle. Richmond, VA: Author.

Wasik. B. (1998). Using volunteers as reading tutors: Guidelines for successful practices.

Reading Teacher, 51(7), 562-570.

Zhang, Y. & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308-319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i5.694