Evaluation of Online Graduate Epidemiology Instruction and Student Outcomes

Authors

  • Jacqueline Knapke University of Cincinnati
  • Erin Haynes University of Cincinnati
  • Julie Breen University of Cincinnati
  • Pierce Kuhnell Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Laura Smith Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Jareen Meinzen-Derr Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i4.737

Keywords:

learning styles, andragogy, graduate education, adult learning, distance learning, epidemiology, web-based learning, student outcomes, student satisfaction

Abstract

In the last two decades, online learning has transformed the field of higher education. Also during this time, institutions of higher education have seen increases in their adult learner populations. The flexibility and accessibility of an online education model is often particularly appealing to adult learners, who bring unique needs, expectations, and learning styles to their educational experiences. Using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory and Knowles’ andragogy model as theoretical frameworks, this study evaluates an online graduate course in epidemiology in terms of the demographics, learning styles, satisfaction, and achievement of students. Comparing the online course to the same, land-based course that was offered concurrently, we found no differences between students’ learning styles, satisfaction, and overall achievement. However, students in the land-based class were more likely to be matriculated into a degree program (p<0.005), more likely to be full-time students (p<0.002), and more likely to work part-time or not at all (p<0.002). These findings provide evidence that student preferences for method of content delivery are correlated to lifestyle factors and not age, previous experiences, or learning styles.

Author Biographies

Jacqueline Knapke, University of Cincinnati

Academic Program Director Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training

Erin Haynes, University of Cincinnati

Associate Professor Division of Epidemiology Department of Environmental Health

Julie Breen, University of Cincinnati

Senior Instruction Designer College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services

Pierce Kuhnell, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Data Management Coordinator

Laura Smith, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Clinical Research Coordinator Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology

Jareen Meinzen-Derr, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Associate Professor Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology

References

Cercone, K. 2008. Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) Journal 16 (2): 137-159.

Fordis, M., King, J.E., Ballantyne, C. M., Jones, P. H., Schneider, K. H., Spann, S. J., Greenberg, S. B., and Greisinger, A. J. 2005. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 294 (9): 1043-1051.

Horton, W. K. 2000. Designing Web-based Training: How to Teach Anyone Anything Anywhere Anytime. New York: Wiley.

Kimmel, S. B., Gaylor, K. P., Grubbs, M. R., and Hayes, J. B. 2012. Good times to hard times: An examination of adult learners’ enrollment from 2004-2010. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management.

Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kolb, D. 1976. Learning style inventory. Boston: McBer and Company.

Knowles, M. S. 1973. The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.

Knowles, M. S. 1980. The Modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Knowles, M. S. 1984. Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Merriam, S. B., and Caffarella, R. S. 1999. Learning in adulthood, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Moore, M. G., and Kearsley, G. 2005. Distance education: A systems view, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. 2005. Reasons for adults' participation in work-related courses, 2002-2003 (NCES 2005-088). Available online at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005088.pdf.

National Center for Education Statistics, IES. 2010. Digest of education statistics. Available online at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010013.pdf

Osgood-Treston, B. 2001. Program completion barriers faced by adult learners in higher education. Academic Exchange Quarterly 5 (2). Available online at http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-76770283.html

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., and Bjork, R. 2008. Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9: 105–119.

Schaller, D. T., Allison-Bunnell, S. W., and Borun, M. 2005. Learning styles and online interactives. In Museums and the Web 2005: Proceedings, ed D. Bearman and J. Trant. Toronto: Archives and Museum Informatics, 2005. Available online at http://www.archimuse.com/mw2005/papers/schaller/schaller.html

Tweedell, C. B. “A Theory of Adult Learning and Implications for Practice.â€

(presentation, Midwest Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL, October 2000). 

Downloads

Published

2016-12-16

Issue

Section

Section II