Creating a Community of Inquiry in Large-Enrollment Online Courses: An Exploratory Study on the Effect of Protocols within Online Discussions

Baiyun Chen, Aimee deNoyelles, Janet Zydney, Kerry Patton

Abstract


It can be difficult to foster focused and effective communication in online discussions within large classes. Implementing protocols is a strategy that may help students communicate more effectively, facilitate their learning process, and improve the quality of their work within online discussions. In this exploratory research study, a protocol was developed and improved over two iterations in a very large undergraduate video-streaming business course (N1=412; N2=450). The discussion instructions were consolidated and adjusted, and design elements such as a grading rubric, exemplary student samples, and due date reminders were added in the second iteration. There were higher perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presences in the second iteration, as well as significantly more group cognition within the discussion measured through a Community of Inquiry coding template. Findings suggest that protocols are a potentially useful strategy to manage online discussions in large classes.

Keywords


Community of Inquiry, large classes, online discussions, protocols

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/index.asp

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework Using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133—136. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003

Author Deleted for Blind Review, 2012

Author Deleted for Blind Review, 2012

Author Deleted for Blind Review, 2014

Eyitayo, O. (2005). Experimenting e-Learning with a large class. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 1(3). Retrieved from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=109&layout=html

Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469-483. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5—9. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157—172. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001

Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87—105. Doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Hew, K.F., & Cheung, W.S. (2011). Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: An analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques. Instructional Science, 39, 303-319. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23882804

Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S., & Ng, C.S. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38, 571-606. doi: [add here]

Hewitt, J., & Brett, C. (2007). The relationship between class size and online activity patterns in asynchronous computer conferencing environments. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1258—1271. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.02.001

Kim, J. (2013). Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62, 123—129. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.025

Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Maringe, F., & Sing, N. (2014). Teaching large classes in an increasingly internationalising higher education environment: Pedagogical, quality and equity issues. Higher Education, 67(6), 761—782. doi:1007/s10734-013-9710-0

Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193—213. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011

Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Orellana, A. (2006). Class size and interaction in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 229—248. Retrieved from http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/4512/4621309/Survey_Online_Class_Size.pdf

Rocca, K.A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185-213. doi: 10.1080/03634520903505936

Tomei, L. (2004). The impact of online teaching on faculty load: Computing the ideal class size for online courses. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from http://itdl.org/journal/jan_04/article04.htm

Yang, Y.-T. C. (2007). A catalyst for teaching critical thinking in a large university class in Taiwan: asynchronous online discussions with the facilitation of teaching assistants. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 241—264. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9054-5




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.816