Student Predisposition to Instructor Feedback and Perceptions of Teaching Presence Predict Motivation Toward Online Courses
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015, February). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/survey-reports-2014/
Author. (2002).
Author. (2004).
Author. (2006).
Author. (2015a).
Author. (2015b).
Author. (2016).
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Kelsey, D. M. (2016). Instructor clarity and student motivation: Academic performance as a product of students’ ability and motivation to process instructional material. Communication Education, 65, 129-148. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329
Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30, 103-116. doi: 10.1080/01587910902845949
Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 200-215. doi: 10.1080/00461528309529274
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340. doi: 10.1080/03634529009378813
Christophel, D. M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292-306. doi: 10.1080/03634529509379020
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26, 127-148. doi: 10.1080/01587910500081376
Easton, S. S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor’s role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52, 87-105. doi: 10.1080/03634520302470
Frisby, B., N., Limperos, A. M., Record, R. A., Downs, E., & Kerscmar, S. E. (2013). Students’ perceptions of social presence: Rhetorical and relational goals across three mediated instructional designs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 468-480.
Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207-219. doi: 10.1080/03634520009379209
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Haleta, L. L. (1996). Student perceptions of teachers’ use of language: The effects of powerful and powerless language on impression formation and uncertainty. Communication Education, 45, 16-28. doi: 10.1080/03634529609379029
Hazel, M., Crandall, H. M., & Caputo, J. S. (2014). The influence of instructor social presence and student academic entitlement on teacher misbehaviors in online courses. Southern Communication Journal, 79, 311-326. doi: 10.1080/1041794X.2014.914563
Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D. (2012). The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: Student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence. Educational Media International, 49, 217-229. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2012.738014
Hunter, J. E. (1973). Methods of reordering the correlation matrix to facilitate visual inspection and preliminary cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 51-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1973.tb00782.x
Hunter, J. E., & Cohen, S. H. (1969). PACKAGE: A system of computer routines for the analysis of correlational data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 697-700. doi: 10.1177/001316446902900315
Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012). Instructional feedback II: How do instructor immediacy cues and facework tactics interact to predict student motivation and fairness perceptions? Communication Studies, 63, 498-517. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2011.632660
King, P. E. (2016). When do students benefit from performance feedback? A test of feedback intervention theory in speaking improvement. Communication Quarterly, 64, 1-15. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2015.1078827
King, P. E., Schrodt, P., & Weisel, J. J. (2009). The instructional feedback orientation scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 235-261. doi: 10.1080/03634520802515705
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
Levine, T. R., & McCroskey, J. C. (1990). Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA-24. Communication Monographs, 57, 62-72. doi: 10.1080/03637759009376185
Malachowski, C. C., Martin, M. M., & Vallade, J. I. (2013). An examination of students’ adaptation, aggression, and apprehension traits with their instructional feedback orientations. Communication Education, 62, 127-147. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.748208
Mandernach, B. J., Gonzales, R. M., & Garrett, A. L. (2006). An examination of online instructor presence via threaded discussion participation. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4, 248-260.
Martin, M. M., Chesebro, J. L., & Mottet, T. P. (1997). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 14, 431-440. doi: 10.1080/08824099709388686
Morreale, S., Staley, C., Stavrositu, C., & Krakowiak, M. (2015). First-year college students’ attitudes toward communication technologies and their perceptions of communication competence in the 21st century. Communication Education, 64, 107-131. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.978799
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Otter, R. R., Seipel, S. Graeff, T., Alexander, B., Boraiko, C., Gray, J., Petersen, & Sadler, K. (2013). Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.08.001
Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55. doi: 10.1080/03634528609388318
Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 143-154. doi: 10.1080/02602930601127869
Pratt, L., Wiseman, R. L., Cody, M. J., & Wendt, P. F. (1999). Interrogative strategies and information exchange in computer-mediated communication. Communication Quarterly, 47, 46-66. doi: /10.1080/01463379909370123
Reddy, D. M., Pfeiffer, H. M., Fleming, R., Ports, K. A., Pedrick, L. E., Barnack-Tavlaris, J. L., Jirovec, D. L., Helion, A. M., & Swain, R. A. (2013). “U-Pace” instruction: Improving student success by integrating content mastery and amplified assistance. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17, 147-154.
Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 260-272. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.629291
Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175-190. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
Sherblom, J. C. (2010). The computer-mediated communication (CMC) classroom: A challenge of medium, presence, interaction, identity, and relationship. Communication Education, 59, 497-523. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.486440
Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M. A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 767-779.
Smith, C. D., & King, P. E. (2004). Student feedback sensitivity and the efficacy of feedback interventions in public speaking performance improvement. Communication Education, 53, 203-216. doi: 10.1080/0363452042000265152
Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12-33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
Trees, A. R., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Hess, J. (2009). Earning influence by communicating respect: Facework’s contributions to effective instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 397-416. doi: 10.1080/03634520802613419
U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Enrollment in distance education courses, by state: Fall 2012 (NCES 2014-023). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014023.pdf
Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Edmonton, AB: AU Press, Athabasca University.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.966
Copyright (c) 2017 Online Learning Journal