Thematic Patterns in International Blended Learning Literature, Research, Practices, and Terminology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.998Keywords:
Blended learning, Hybrid learning, International, Literature review, Themes, ResearchAmong the top cited articles there are strong similarities in blended learning research processes, practice, terminology, and focus. The goal of this research was to discAbstract
Among the top cited articles there are strong similarities in blended learning research processes, practice, terminology, and focus. The goal of this research was to discover and compare the themes of the top articles on blended learning from different regions of the world. There are small differences between the top articles in each region and the top articles in general, but they follow largely similar patterns, which indicates that themes do not need to hinder collaboration and exchange between regions and that the most cited articles from around the world could fit well within the topical, research, and publication practices of the field at large. Our results suggest that although different regions must have their own nuances and needs, they have much in common and considerable potential to learn from one another and even collaborate on shared interests.References
World Open Educational Resources Congress. (2012). 2012 Paris OER Declaration. (pp. 1–2). Paris. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/Paris OER Declaration_01.pdf.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S. higher education (pp. 1–49). Babson Survey Research Group and Pearson. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/openingthecurriculum2014.pdf.
Allen, M. Bourhis, J., & Burrell, N. (2010). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83–97.
Authors (2006)
Authors (2012)
Authors (2013)
Authors (2013b)
Authors (2014)
Authors (2014b)
Authors (2014c)
Authors (In press)
Barbour, M., Brown, R., Waters, L. H., Hoey, R., Hunt, J. L., Kennedy, K., … Trimm, T. (2011). Online and Blended Learning : A Survey of Policy and Practice of K-12 Schools Around the World. Regional Association for K-12 Online Learning (1–128). Vienna, VA.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.
Bhattacharya, I., & Sharma, K. (2007). India in the knowledge economy – an electronic paradigm. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(6), 543–568. doi:10.1108/09513540710780055
Bliuc, A.-M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231–244. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001
Bloom, B., Krathwohl, D., & Masia, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objective: The classification of educational goals (II.). New York, NY: David McKay Co.
Boitshwarelo, B. (2009). Exploring blended learning for science teacher professional development in an African context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(4), 1–19.
Bonk, C. J., Kim, K.-J., & Zeng, T. (2006). Future directions of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 550–567). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Bozalek, V., & Biersteker, L. (2010). Exploring Power and Privilege Using Participatory Learning and Action Techniques. Social Work Education, 29(5), 551–572. doi:10.1080/02615470903193785
Brown, B. W., & Liedholm, C. E. (2002). Can Web Courses Replace the Classroom in Principles of Microeconomics ? The American Economic Review, 92(2), 444–448. doi:DOI: 10.1257/000282802320191778
Chandra, V., & Lloyd, M. (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1087–1098. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00790.x
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
Collis, B., & van der Wende, M. (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education: An international comparative survey on the current and future use of ICT in higher education. Twente: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente.
Cox, G., Carr, T., & Hall, M. (2004). Evaluating the use of synchronous communication in two blended courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (20), 183–193.
DeGeorge-Walker, L., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: a case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 1–13. doi:10.1080/07294360903277380
Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning and the generations: Knowledge is power-no more. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp. 85–100). Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
EL-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education, 51(3), 988–1006. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.001
Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., O’Hara, A., & Prosser, M. (2007). The university student experience of face-to-face and online discussions: Coherence, reflection and meaning. Alt-J: Research in Learning Technology, 15(1), 83–97. doi:10.1080/09687760601130057
Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O’Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and faceâ€toâ€face discussion: Conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 244–256. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00173.x/full
Garrote, R., Pettersson, T., & Christie, M. (2011). LiveUSB mediated education: A method to facilitate computer-supported education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 619–632.
Hall, H., & Davison, B. (2007). Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: The value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library & Information Science Research, 29(2), 163–187. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.007
Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., & Boticki, I. (2009). A blended learning approach to course design and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(1), 19–30. doi:10.1109/TE.2007.914945
Kim, K.-J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education: The survey says …. Educause Quarterly, (2006), 22–30.
Llambi, L., Esteves, E., Martinex, E., Forster, T., Garcia, S., Miranda, N., … Margolis, A. (2011). Teaching Tobacco Cessation Skills to Uruguayan Physicians Using Information and Communication. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 31(1), 43–48. doi:10.1002/chp
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (September 2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies (pp. v–53). U.S. Department of Education, Washington D.C. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.
Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 313–337.
Ng’ambi, D., Lombe, A., & Ng, D. (2012). Using Podcasting to Facilitate Student Learning : A Constructivist Perspective, 15, 181–192.
Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56(3), 689–699. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.011
Oh, E., & Park, S. (2009). How are universities involved in blended instruction? Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 327– 342.
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “blended learning†be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17–26. doi:10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.2
Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285–1296. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011
Pearson, J., & Trinidad, S. (2005). OLES: An instrument for refining the design of e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 396–404. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00146.x
Peixoto, H. M., Peixoto, M. M., & Alves, E. D. (2012). Learning strategies used by undergraduate and postgraduate students in hybrid courses in the area of health. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 20(3), 551–8. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22991118
Picciano, A. G., & Seaman, J. (2007). K-12 online learning: A survey of U.S. school district administrators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(3), 11–37.
Precel, K., Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Alberton, Y. (2009). Pedagogical and design aspects of a blended learning course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1–16.
Prinsloo, P., & VanRooyen, A. A. (2007). Exploring a blended learning approach to improving student success in the teaching of second year accounting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 15(1), 51–69. doi:10.1108/10222529200700004
Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of E-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 81(3), 207–12. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16501260
Sife, A. S., Lwoga, E. T., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 3(2), 57–67.
Tham, R., & Tham, L. (2013). Challenges facing blended learning in higher education in Asia. International Journal on E-Learning. 12, 209–219.
UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries: final report. (2002). Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf
Unwin, T. (2004). Towards a framework for the use of ICT in teacher training in Africa. Open Learning, 20(2), 1–26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
