Exploring the relationship between teaching presence, self-regulation, and co-regulation in online courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i3.5236Keywords:
Online courses, teaching presence, self-regulation, co-regulation, regulated learningAbstract
This study explores the relationship between teaching presence and students’ self- and co-regulation, in online learning courses. Data were collected from 283 students enrolled in online courses using the Teaching Presence Scale of the Community of Inquiry survey and a Shared Metacognition Questionnaire. Descriptive analyses revealed that students perceived their instructor’s course design practices, particularly clear communication of goals, deadlines, and instructions, as the most influential component of teaching presence in enhancing their learning experiences. Students reported strong self-regulation, especially in maintaining awareness of effort and motivation. For co-regulation, while students recognized the importance of considering and listening to peer feedback, the greater variability in these ratings suggested differing levels of value placed on these collaborative practices. Regression analyses showed that both course design and facilitation significantly predicted self-regulation, explaining 25.9% of its variance, whereas facilitation alone predicted co-regulation, accounting for 26% of its variance. These findings emphasize the importance of intentional course design and active facilitation in fostering self-regulation and co-regulation in online courses. The study contributes to advancing the Community of Inquiry framework by integrating metacognitive constructs and offers actionable strategies for designing online courses that promote autonomy and shared responsibility for learning.
References
Akyol, Z. (2013). Metacognitive development within the Community of Inquiry. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 30–44). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch003
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157, 103966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends, 64(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
Chen, Y., & Chen, L. (2025). Promoting shared metacognition in online learning: The practices of distributed teaching presence and the relationships to cognitive presence. Education Sciences, 15(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010004
Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students' perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Doo, M. Y., Bonk, C. J., & Heo, H. (2023). Examinations of the relationships between self-efficacy, self-regulation, teaching, cognitive presences, and learning engagement during COVID-19. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10187-3
Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st century: A Community of Inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge/Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263
Garrison, D. R. (2022). Shared metacognition in a Community of Inquiry. Online Learning, 26(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2004). Student role adjustment in on-line communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i2.1828
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. Schunk & J. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 83–106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6
Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Education, 95, 270–284.
Järvelä, S., Hadwin, A. F., Malmberg, J., & Miller, M. (2018). Contemporary perspectives of regulated learning in collaboration. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 212–221). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572-13
Järvenoja, H., Törmänen, T., Lehtoaho, E., Turunen, M., Suoraniemi, J., & Edwards, J. (2025). Investigating peer influence on collaborative group members' motivation through the lens of socially shared regulation of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 00, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12754
Kilis, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition, and motivation. Computers & Education, 126, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33.
Koehler, A. A., Fiock, H., Janakiraman, S., Cheng, Z., & Wang, H. (2020). Asynchronous online discussions during case-based learning: A problem-solving process. Online Learning, 24(4), 64–92. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2332
Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007
Liao, H., Zhang, Q., Yang, L., & Fei, Y. (2023). Investigating relationships among regulated learning, teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning: An experience sampling analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12997–13025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11717-5
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2020). Social presence and online discussions: A mixed method investigation. Distance Education, 41(4), 490–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1821603
Maré, S., & Mutezo, A. T. (2025). The community of inquiry, shared metacognition, and student engagement in online learning: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2479164
Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2020). Instructor perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies in online courses. Online Learning, 24(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1980
Morrison, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2023). The role of feedback in building teaching presence and student self-regulation in online learning. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100503
Olesova, L., & Sadaf, A. (2023). Online presence, metacognition, and course design within the community of inquiry. 20th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA) 2023 (pp. 60–66). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED636439.pdf
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Sadaf, A., Kim, S. Y., & Koehler, A. (2023). Relationship between teaching presence and shared-metacognition in online case-based courses. 20th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA) 2023 (pp. 77–83). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED636439.pdf
Sadaf, A., Kim, S. Y., & Olesova, L. (2022). Relationship between metacognition and online community of inquiry in an online case-based course. Online Learning, 26(4), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3474
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Snyder, M. M., & Dringus, L. P. (2014). An exploration of metacognition in asynchronous student-led discussions: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(2), 1–19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1036268.pdf
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
Swan, K., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor, 2(24), 1–12. http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul_v2.php?numer=24&id=543
Tsai, Y. H., Lin, C. H., Hong, J. C., & Tai, K. H. (2018). The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers & Education, 121, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011
Vaughan, N., & Wah, J. L. (2020). The Community of Inquiry framework: Future practical directions-shared metacognition. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 35(1), 1–25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1278566.pdf
Vuopala, E., Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., & Järvelä, S. (2019). Knowledge co-construction activities and task-related monitoring in scripted collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.011
Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Effects of online teaching presence on students’ interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12408
Watson, S., Sullivan, D. P., & Watson, K. (2023). Teaching Presence in Asynchronous Online Classes: It's Not Just a Façade. Online Learning, 27(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3231
Xu, D., & Xu, Y. (2019). The promises and limits of online higher education: Understanding how distance education affects access, cost, and quality. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596296.pdf
Yu, T., & Richardson, J. C. (2015). An exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis of the Student Online Learning Readiness (SOLR) instrument. Online Learning, 19(5), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i5.593
Zhao, L., & Ye, C. (2020). Time and performance in online learning: Applying the theoretical perspective of metacognition. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12216
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ayesha Sadaf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
