Using Word Clouds in Online Discussions to Support Critical Thinking and Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.528Keywords:
Online discussions, word clouds, critical thinking, engagement, higher educationAbstract
Being actively engaged in a task is often associated with critical thinking. Cultivating critical thinking skills, such as purposefully reflecting and analyzing one’s own thinking, is a major goal of higher education. However, there is a challenge in providing college students opportunities to clearly demonstrate these skills in online courses. This research explores the effectiveness of incorporating word clouds–visual representations of word frequency in a given passage of text–into online discussions. We sought to establish whether implementing word clouds in online discussions would result in a higher incidence of critical thinking and engagement. Survey results from undergraduate participants (n=132) revealed that students analyzing text in word clouds reported moderately higher scores on critical thinking and engagement than students analyzing the text in a linear fashion. A positive relationship was found between critical thinking and engagement, as well as peer interaction. This strategy can be applied to a wide range of educational environments to stimulate critical thinking and engagement.References
Ahearn, L. (2013). Commentary: Keywords as a literacy practice in the history of
anthropological theory. American Ethnologist, 40(1), 6-12. doi:10.1111/amet.12001
Bandeen, H., & Sawin, J. (2012). Encourage students to read through use of data
visualization. College Teaching, 60, 38-39. doi:10.1080/87567555.2011.580638
Baralt, M., Pennestri, S., & Selvandin, M. (2011). Action research: Using wordles to
teach foreign language writing. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 12-22.
Behar-Horenstein, L.S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher
education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(2), 25-41.
Bromley, K. (2013). Using word clouds in the classroom. The Utah Journal of
Literacy. 16(1), 39-41.
Brookfield, S.D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore
alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cleveland-Innes, M. & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269-292.
Comer, D. & Lenaghan, J. (2013). Enhancing discussions in the asynchronous online classroom: The lack of face-to-face interaction does not lessen the lesson. Journal of Management Education, 37(2), 261-294. doi:10.1177/1052562912442384.
DaPaolo, C.A., & Wilkinson, K. (2014). Get your head into the clouds: Using word
clouds for analyzing qualitative assessment data. Tech Trends, 58(3), 38-44.
doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0750-9
Darabi, A., Arrastia, M.C., Nelson, D.W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive
presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216-227.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00392.x
Edyburn, D. (2010). Word clouds: Valuable tools when you can’t see ideas through the
words. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(2), 68-72.
Ennis, R.H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32, 81-
Ennis, R.H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J.
Baron & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9-26). New York: W.H. Freeman.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of
the content, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion
environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469-483. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
Hamm, S.E. (2011). Using word clouds for reflection and discussion in an online class.
Teaching Theology and Religion, 14(2), 156.
Hays, W.L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and
Winston, Inc.
Huisman R., Miller, W., & Trinoskey, J. (2011, October). We’ve Wordled, have you?
Digital images in the library classroom. College &Research Libraries News.
Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/9/522.full
Jablon, J.R., & Wilkinson, M. (2006). Using engagement strategies to facilitate children’s
learning and success. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200603/JablonBTJ.pdf
Joyner, F. (2012). Increasing student interaction and the development of critical thinking
in asynchronous threaded discussions. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(1), 35-41.
Kaptein, R., Hiemstra, D., & Kamps, J. (2010). How different are language models and
word clouds? In 32nd European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2010) (pp. 556-568). Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-12275-0_48
Lee, S-M. (2014). The relationships between higher-order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education 21, 41-52. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.12.002
McLean, C.L. (2005). Evaluating critical thinking skills: Two conceptualizations. Journal
of Distance Education, 20(2), 1-20.
McNaught, C., & Lam, P. (2010). Using Wordle as a supplementary research tool.
The Qualitative Report. 15(3), 630-643.
Nickel, J. (2012). Word clouds in math classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the
Middle School, 17(9), 565-566.
Perry, L. (2012). Using word clouds to teach about speaking style. Communication
Teacher, 26(4), 220-226. doi:10.1080/17404622.2012.702918
Richardson, J. & Ice, P. (2010). Investigating students’ level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education 13(1-2), 52-59. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.009
Szabo, Z. & Schwartz, J. (2011). Learning methods for teacher education: the use of online discussions to improve critical thinking. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 20(1), 79-94. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2010.534866
Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Evidence from
four institutional case studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 740-763.
doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0056
Viégas, F.B., Wattenberg, M., & Feinberg, J. (2009). Participatory visualization with
Wordle. IEEE InfoVis 2009. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5290722
Waggoner, M. (2013). Cultivating critique: A (humanoid) response to the
online teaching of critical thinking. Liberal Education, 38-43.
Wise, A., Speer, J., Marbouti, F., & Hsiao, Y. (2013). Broadening the notion of
participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners’ online
listening behaviors. Instructional Science, 41, 323-343.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions