Using an online engagement framework to redesign the learning environment for higher education students: A design experiment approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4447

Keywords:

Online learning, regional university, student engagement, teacher education, student success

Abstract

With more higher education courses being offered online, the design of the learning environment is an essential component of the educational experience. However, not all online learning environments facilitate student engagement. This paper describes the redesign of two online Initial Teacher Education courses in a regional university, using the Online Engagement Framework (OEF) for higher education. Following a design experiment approach, we audited the online course components in the previous offerings and redesigned the courses considering the five dimensions of online learning. To understand the effectiveness of the redesign, we analysed student feedback from 24 course offerings along with course analytics. We identified significant increased student engagement and student data showed they highly valued cognitive, behavioural and emotional elements within online courses. The findings suggest that the OEF could be used to guide the redesign of learning environments to forefront student engagement.

References

Ayalon, M., & Wilkie, K. (2020). Developing assessment literacy through approximations of practice: Exploring secondary mathematics pre-service teachers developing criteria for a rich quadratics task. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103011

Baya’a, N. F., & Daher, W. M. (2009). Learning mathematics in an authentic mobile environment: The perceptions of students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile, 3(S1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v3s1.813

Bledsoe, T. (2013). A multimedia-rich platform to enhance student engagement and learning in an online environment. Online Learning Journal, 17(4). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183762/.

Brown, A., Lawrence, J., Redmond, P., Cohen, J., Foote, S.M., & Stone, C. (2023). HERDSA Guide: Enhancing Online Engagement in Higher Education. HERDSA. https://www.herdsa.org.au/publications/guides/enhancing-online-engagement-higher-education

Burke, K., & Fanshawe, M. (2024). Student perceptions of supports for managing study in higher education according to internal and external locus of control. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2024.2362843

Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Tualaulelei, E. (2022). We can’t always measure what matters: Revealing opportunities to enhance online student engagement through pedagogical care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1909712

Burke, K.M., & Larmar, S.A. (2020). Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(5), 601 - 615. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1804536

Chen, P.-S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008

Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13

Costa, C., Murphy, M., Pereira, A. L., & Taylor, Y. (2018). Higher education students’ experiences of digital learning and (dis)empowerment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3979

Dart, S., & Spratt, B. (2021). Personalised Emails in First-Year Mathematics: Exploring a Scalable Strategy for Improving Student Experiences and Outcomes. Student Success, 12(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1543

Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2015). Exploring university students’ use of technologies beyond the formal learning context: A tale of two online platforms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 313–327.

https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1505

Dowling-Hetherington, L., & Glowatz, M. (2017). The usefulness of digital badges in higher education: Exploring the students’ perspectives. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7Z13C

Everingham, Y. L., Gyuris, E., & Connolly, S. R. (2017). Enhancing student engagement to positively impact mathematics anxiety, confidence and achievement for interdisciplinary science subjects. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(8), 1153–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1305130

Falloon, G. (2010). Using avatars and virtual environments in learning: What do they have to offer? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00991.x

Fanshawe, M., Delaney, N., & Powell, A. (2020). Utilizing instantaneous feedback to promote self-regulated learning in online higher education courses: The Case for digital badges. In Technology-enhanced formative assessment practices in higher education (pp. 41-59). IGI Global.

Fowler, S., Cutting, C., Fiedler, S.H., & Leonard, S. (2022). Design-based research in mathematics education: trends, challenges and potential. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00407-5

Garrison, D., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The community of inquiry theoretical framework. Handbook of distance education, 3, 104-120.

Kennedy, G. (2020). What is student engagement in online learning … and how do I know when it is there? Melbourne CSHE Discussion Paper. Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.

Kilgour, P., Reynaud, D., Northcote, M., McLoughlin, C., & Gosselin, K. P. (2019). Threshold concepts about online pedagogy for novice online teachers in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1450360

Kimmins, L. R. (2013). Meet-up for success: The story of a peer led program’s journey. Journal of Peer Learning, 6, 103–107. https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol6/iss1/9

Krishnan, S. (2016). Students’ perceptions of learning mode in mathematics. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences 4(2), 32–41. https://mojes.um.edu.my/article/view/12647

Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196-216. http://doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455

Lawrence, J., Brown, A., Redmond, P., Maloney, S., Basson, M., Galligan L., & Turner, J. (2021). Does course specific nudging enhance student engagement, experience and success?: A data-driven longitudinal tale. Student Success, 12(2), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1914

Linse, A. R. (2017). Interpreting and using student ratings data: Guidance for faculty serving as administrators and on evaluation committees. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.12.004

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 3351–3364. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335

Marfuah, M., Novita, R. & Danoebroto, S.W. Book Review: Supporting mathematics educators through and towards online learning. Karen Hollebrands, Robin Anderson, and Kevin Oliver (Eds). (2021) Online learning in mathematics education. Educ Stud Math (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10175-z

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205-222. http://doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Redmond, P., Alexsen, M., Maloney, S., Turner, J., Brown, A., Basson, M., Galligan, L., Lawrence, J. & Henderson, R. (2023). Student Perceptions of Online Engagement. Online Learning, 27(1), 383-403. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3320

Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A. & Henderson, R. (2018) An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175

Roland, N., Frenay, M., & Boudrenghien, G. (2018). Understanding academic persistence through the theory of planned behavior: Normative factors under investigation. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116656632

Rubin, B., Fernandes, R., Avgerinou, M. D., & Moore, J. (2010). The effect of learning management systems on student and faculty outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 82–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.008

Russell, G., & Topham, P. (2012). The impact of social anxiety on student learning and well-being in higher education. Journal of Mental Health, 21(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.694505

Simon, M. (2022). Contributions of the learning through activity theoretical framework to understanding and using manipulatives in the learning and teaching of mathematical concepts, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100945

Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924

Stone, C., Freeman, E., Dyment, J., Muir, T., & Milthorpe, N. (2019). Equal or equitable? The role of flexibility within online education. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 29(3), 26–40. https://journal.spera.asn.au/index.php/AIJRE/article/view/221

Stone, C., & O'Shea, S. E. (2019). My children … think it’s cool that Mum is a uni student: Women with caring responsibilities studying online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5504

Tualaulelei, E., Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Cameron, C. (2022). Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421990847

Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012

Wanner, T. (2014). Parallel universes: Student and teacher expectations and interactions in online vs face-to-face teaching and learning environments. Ergo, 3(3), 37–45.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-23

How to Cite

Fanshawe, M., Brown, A., & Redmond, P. (2025). Using an online engagement framework to redesign the learning environment for higher education students: A design experiment approach. Online Learning, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i2.4447

Issue

Section

Students, Community, and Online Learning

Most read articles by the same author(s)