Online strategies instructors employ to support and enhance student engagement and learning in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i3.5032Keywords:
Higher Education, university, online teaching, pedagogy, student engagementAbstract
Over the past decade, evidence indicates more higher education (HE) students attracted to studying online. Important publications on this topic illustrate teachers’ and instructors’ growing awareness of the key conditions, elements, and dimensions that increase the likelihood of online student engagement and its impact on student learning and success. However, while studies are starting to emerge that address the online engagement strategies instructors employ and the impact of these practices, there is still a paucity of research that explores the most popular practices employed to support student engagement in HE online learning environments. Drawing on international survey data (N = 115), this study reports on insights from online instructors and learning designers regarding their preferred online engagement practices. Insights from the study provide a practice-informed account of how engagement is operationalised in online learning environments at scale. Rather than evaluating the effectiveness of individual strategies, the study maps dominant patterns of use and identifies three overarching pedagogical approaches—collaborative, cognitive, and humanising practices—that instructors most frequently employed. Importantly, the findings demonstrate that engagement strategies are rarely implemented in isolation; instead, instructors design activities that simultaneously support multiple dimensions of engagement. This paper advances knowledge in online and blended learning by documenting which student engagement strategies are most enacted by online teachers, and how these engagement strategies function collectively in contemporary higher education practice.
References
Australian Government. (2023). Key findings from the 2023 higher education student statistics. https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/student-data/selected-higher-education-statistics-2023-student-data/key-findings-2023-student-data
Australian Government. (2024). Australian university accord – Final report. https://www.education.gov.au/australian-universities-accord/resources/final-report
Australian Government. Department of Education. (2020). Completion rates of higher education students - Cohort analysis, 2005-2019. https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/resources/completion-rates-higher-education-students-cohort-analysis-2005-2019
Brown, A. (2024). Online student engagement in higher education – what it is, why we need it, and how we can promote it? In C. Stone., & S. O’Shea (Eds.), The research handbook on student engagement in higher education (pp. 39-53). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035314294
Brown, A., Lawrence, J., Redmond, P., Cohen, J., Foote, S. M., & Stone, C. (2023). HERDSA guide: Enhancing online engagement in higher education. HERDSA. https://www.herdsa.org.au/publications/guides/enhancing-online-engagement-higher-education
Bedi, A. (2023). Keep learning: Student engagement in an online environment. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3287
Bergdahl, N. (2022). Engagement and disengagement in online learning. Computers & Education, 188, Article 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104561
Bergdahl, N., & Hietajärvi, L. (2022). Social engagement in distance-, remote-, and hybrid learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 8(3), 315–342. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/221444
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2021). Factors underlying the perceived importance of online student engagement strategies. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(2), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2020-0045
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
Chatterjee, R., & Correia, A. P. (2020). Online students’ attitudes toward collaborative learning and sense of community. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1703479
Chen, B., Chang, Y. H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.002
Chen, Y., & Chen, L. (2024). Promoting shared metacognition in online learning: The practices of distributed teaching presence and the relationships to cognitive presence. Education Sciences, 15(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010004
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Delve, Ho, L., & Limpaecher, A. (2023, February 20). What is thematic content analysis in qualitative research? https://delvetool.com/blog/thematic-content-analysis
Devis-Rozental, C., & Clarke, S. (Eds.). (2020). Humanising higher education: A positive approach to enhancing wellbeing. Palgrave Macmillan.
Divan, A., Ludwig, L. O., Matthews, K. E., Motley, P. M., & Tomljenovic-Berube, A. M. (2017). Survey of research approaches utilised in the scholarship of teaching and learning publications. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.3
Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Online learning and community engagement: Strategies for promoting inclusivity and collaboration in education. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0693
Evans, T., Kensington-Miller, B., & Novak, J. (2021). Effectiveness, efficiency, engagement: Mapping the impact of pre-lecture quizzes on educational exchange. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 163–177.
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
Foote, S. (2023). A return to humanity in teaching. Pedagogicon Conference Proceedings, 1. https://encompass.eku.edu/pedagogicon/2022/build-it/1
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gleason, B. (2021). Expanding interaction in online courses: Integrating critical humanizing pedagogy for learner success. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09888-w
Griffin, C. P., & Howard, S. (2017). Restructuring the college classroom: A critical reflection on the use of collaborative strategies to target student engagement in higher education. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717692681
Hamadi, H., Tafili, A., Kates, F. R., Larson, S. A., Ellison, C., & Song, J. (2023). Exploring an innovative approach to enhance discussion board engagement. TechTrends, 67(4), 741–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00850-0
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hollister, B., Navir, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie. (2022). Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
Ioannou, A., Brown, S. W., & Artino, A. R. (2015). Wikis and forums for collaborative problem-based activity: A systematic comparison of learners’ interactions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.001
Kahn, P. E. (2017). The flourishing and dehumanization of students in higher education. Journal of Critical Realism, 16(4), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2017.134744
Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z
Kahu, E. R., Picton, C., & Nelson, K. (2020). Pathways to engagement: A longitudinal study of the first-year student experience in the educational interface. Higher Education, 79(4), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00429-w
Kim, H. J., Kong, Y., Hernandez, C., & Soban, M. (2023). Student emotions and engagement: Enacting humanizing pedagogy in higher education. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11(3), 185–206.
Kipling, R. P., Stiles, W. A. V., de Andrade-Lima, M., MacKintosh, N., Roberts, M. W., Williams, C. L., Wootton-Beard, P. C., & Watson-Jones, S. J. (2022). Interaction in online postgraduate learning: What makes a good forum? Distance Education, 44(1), 162–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2150391
Latecka, E. (2023). Humanising pedagogy: A politico-economic perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(5), 634–651.
Lawrence, J., Brown, A., Cohen, J., Redmond, P., Foote, S., & Stone, C. (2024). Galvanising transition and success for underrepresented students: Five conditions for enhancing online student engagement. Student Success, 15(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.3453
Li, I. W., & Carroll, D. R. (2020). Factors influencing dropout and academic performance: An Australian higher education equity perspective. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1649993
Li, Q., Bañuelos, M., Liu, Y., & Xu, D. (2022). Online instruction for a humanized learning experience: Techniques used by college instructors. Computers & Education, 189, Article 104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104595
Lock, J., & Redmond, P. (2006). International online collaboration: Modeling online learning and teaching. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(4), 233–247.
Mapaling, C., & Hoelson, C. N. (2022). Humanising pedagogy within higher education: A ten-year scoping literature review. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 6(3), 68–81.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Martin, F., Bolliger, D. U., & Flowers, C. (2021). Design matters: Development and validation of the Online Course Design Elements (OCDE) instrument. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5187
Mehta, R., & Aguilera, E. (2020). A critical approach to humanizing pedagogies in online teaching and learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2019-0099
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Mowreader, A. (2023, December 6). Four considerations for effective end-of-term learning. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2023/12/06/four-considerations-effective-end-term-learning
Murphy, M. P., Heffernan, A., Dunton, C., & Arsenault, A. C. (2023). The disciplinary scholarship of teaching and learning in political science and international relations: Methods, topics, and impact. International Politics, 60(5), 1030–1048.
Oliver, R. (2001). Assuring the quality of online learning in Australian higher education. In M. Wallace, A. Ellis, & D. Newton (Eds.), Proceedings of Moving Online II Conference (pp. 222–231). Southern Cross University.
Oyarzun, B., & Martin, F. (2023). A systematic review of research on online learner collaboration from 2012-21: Collaboration technologies, design, facilitation, and outcomes. Online Learning, 27(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407
Park, S-Y., Shon, C., Kwon, O. Y., Yoon, T. Y., & Kwon, I. (2017). A qualitative thematic content analysis of medical students’ essays on professionalism. BMC Medical Education, 17, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0920-5
Panitz, T., & Panitz, P. (2018). Encouraging the use of collaborative learning in higher education. In J. Forest (Ed.), University teaching: International perspective (1st ed., pp. 161–202). Routledge.
Peddibhotla, N., & Jani, A. (2019). How group size and structure of online discussion forums influence student engagement and learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(2), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519877614
Ragusa, A. T., & Crampton, A. (2018). Sense of connection, identity and academic success in distance education: Sociologically exploring online learning environments. Rural Society, 27(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2018.1472914
Redmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands, changing directions: Proceedings Ascilite Hobart 2011 (pp. 1050–1060). http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/Redmond-full.pdf
Redmond, P., Alexsen, M., Maloney, S., Turner, J., Brown, A., Basson, M., Gallison, L., Lawrence, J., & Henderson, R. (2023). Student perceptions of online engagement. Online Learning, 27(1), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3320
Redmond, P., Foote, S. M., Brown, A., Mixson-Brookshire, D., Abawi, L. A., & Henderson, R. (2022). Adopting a framework to support the process of critical reflection and understanding of online engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09281-3
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Ross, B., Chase, A. M., Robbie, D., Oates, G., & Absalom, Y. (2018). Adaptive quizzes to increase motivation, engagement and learning outcomes in a first-year accounting unit. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–14.
Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
Sathorar, H., Geduld, D., Moeng, M., Mapasa, T., & Oosthuizen, H. (2023). Leading for sustainability and empowerment: Reflecting on the power of collaboration and humanising pedagogy. Educational Research for Social Change, 12(2), 78–95.
Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., & Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2001). Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network. Online Education, 2, 7–31. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/2764
Sherifi, D., Jia, Y., Hunt, T. J., & Ndanga, M. (2023). Evaluation of a PlayPosit guided group project’s impact on student engagement in an undergraduate course. Discover Education, 2, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00057-8
Shi, H., Hur, J., Tang, Y. M., & Dennen, V. P. (2023). Instructional strategies for engaging online learners: Do learner-centeredness and modality matter? Online Learning, 27(4), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4038
Soo, K. S., & Bonk, C. J. (1998). Interaction: What does it mean in online distance education? [Conference presentation]. Ed-Media and EdTelecom 98 Conference, Freiburg, Germany.
Stone, C. (2016). Opportunity through online learning: Improving student access, participation and success in higher education - Equity fellowship final report. https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/CathyStone_EQUITY-FELLOWSHIP-FINAL-REPORT.pdf
Stone, C. (2022). From the margins to the mainstream: The online learning rethink and its implications for enhancing student equity. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8136
Stone, C., & O'Shea, S. (2019). Older, online and first: Recommendations for retention and success. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3913
Swan, K. (2005). A constructivist model for thinking about learning online. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities. Sloan-C.
Tight, M. (2020). Student retention and engagement in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1576860
Turk, M., Turk, S. T., Muftuoglu, A. C., Karakaya, O., & Karakaya, K. (2024). Students’ expectations and experiences about engagement strategies in online courses: A mixed methods study. Online Learning, 28(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3937
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Gauvin & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 34–40). Scientific American Books.
Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2019a). Conceptualization and assessment of adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000431
Wang, M.-T., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2019b). An integrative development-in-sociocultural-context model for children's engagement in learning. The American Psychologist, 74(9), 1086–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000522
Wolf, C., Joye, D., Smith, T. W., & Fu, Y. (2016). The SAGE handbook of survey methodology. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893
Xu, Z., Zhou, X., Watts, J., & Kogut, A. (2023). The effect of student engagement strategies in online instruction for data management skills. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10267–10284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11572-w
Yan, M., & Pourdavood, R. G. (2024). Faculty and student perspectives on online learning in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080801
Yang, B. (2024). Combining Danmaku and discussion boards: Toward a scalable and sociable environment for mass collaboration in MOOCs. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 19, 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09426-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Associate Professor Alice Brown, Associate Professor Jay Cohen, Professor Jill Lawrence, Professor Petrea Redmond, Dr Stephanie Foote, Dr Megan Kimber
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
