The Anticipated Impact of Artificial Intelligence on US Higher Education: A National Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4646Keywords:
artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence, higher education, AIED, institutional change, AI IntegrationAbstract
Since the rise of generative AI (GenAI) in late 2022, many scholars and thought leaders have wondered about its impact on higher education. This study used a survey methodology (three multiple choice questions and one open-ended question) to explore the perspectives of a nationally representative sample of 1327 US administrators and faculty, asking questions to understand how much change they anticipate as a result of advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, how prepared their institution is for such change, and what aspects of higher education they expect to change. The researchers used Kranzberg’s laws of technology as a lens to interpret the findings and guide the subsequent discussion about how AI might impact higher education. The findings showed that the vast majority of participants expect that AI will change their institution over the next five years and that the majority of participants do not feel that their institution is ready for change. The comments left in response to the open-ended questions fell into one of four themes: concerns about academic integrity and rigor, issues related to AI integration (e.g., anticipated benefits, practices in teaching and learning, issues related to preparedness, and the expected scope of change), the feeling that the current AI discourse is merely hype, and feelings of uncertainty. Ultimately, AI has the potential to be both advantageous and disadvantageous to teaching and learning, with the benefits and challenges of its use varying by context.
References
Bozkurt, A., & Bae, H. (2024). May the force be with you JedAI: Balancing the light and dark sides of generative AI in the educational landscape. Online Learning Journal, 28(2), 1–6. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/4563
Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A, . . . Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53–130. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/709/394
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Crompton, H., & Burke, D., Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(22), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Fink, G. (2024, April 25). Decoding generative AI and equity in higher education. WCET | Every Learning Everywhere. https://wcet.wiche.edu/frontiers/2024/04/25/decoding-generative-ai-and-equity-in-higher-education/
Gunder, A. (2024). OLC framework for comprehensive design, equitable implementation, and continuous improvement of AI strategy. Online Learning Consortium. https://olc-wordpress-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2024/03/Framework-for-Comprehensive-Design-Equitable-Implementation-and-Continuous-Improvement-of-AI-Strategy.pdf
Johnson, N., Seaman, J., & Seaman, J. (in press). A hopeful future? Preparedness and optimism-pessimism about the future of post-secondary education. Open Praxis.
Kranzberg, M. (1986). Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s Laws.” Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3105385
Mollick, E. (2024). Co-intelligence: Living and working with AI. Portfolio, Penguin.
Pelletier, K., McCormack, M., Muscanell, N., Reeves, J., Robert, J., & Arbino, N. (2024). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report, Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2024/5/2024hrteachinglearning.pdf
Pitt, C., Paschen, J., Kietzmann, J., Pitt, L., & Pala, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence, marketing, and the history of technology: Kranzberg’s laws as a conceptual lens. Australasian Marketing Journal, 31(1), 81–89. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/18393349211044175
Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(22), 1–13. https://telrp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
Ross, J. (2017). Speculative method in digital education research. Learning, Media, and Technology, 42(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1160927
Salhab, R. (2024). AI literacy across curriculum design: Investigating college instructors’ perspectives. Online Learning Journal, 28(2), 1–21. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/4426/1363
Schroeder, R. (2024, March 13). Uncharted territory: Artificial general intelligence and higher ed. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/blogs/online-trending-now/2024/03/13/artificial-general-intelligence-and-higher-education
Staudt Willet, K. B., & Na, H. (2024). Generative AI generating buzz: Volume, engagement, and content of initial reactions to ChatGPT in discussions across education-related subreddits. Online Learning Journal, 28(2), 1–24. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/4434
UNESCO. (2024, May 16). Use of AI in education: Deciding on the future we want. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/use-ai-education-deciding-future-we-want
Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., & Johnson, N. (2024). Is artificial intelligence in education an object or a subject? Evidence from a story completion exercise on learning-AI interactions. TechTrends, 68, 411–422. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-024-00942-5
Veletsianos, G., Johnson, N., & Seaman, J. (2021). Digital faculty: Faculty expectations about the future of higher education. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digitalfaculty-futures.pdf
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systemic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nicole Johnson, Jeff Seaman, Julia Seaman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
