Developing Confidence, Developing Skills: The Perceived Effect of Professional Development on Online Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i4.5208Keywords:
professional development, training, online teaching, pedagogy, postsecondary education, fully-online classesAbstract
A large body of research has documented weaker student performance in online courses relative to face-to-face courses across multiple outcomes, including grades, course completion, and persistence. These gaps are particularly pronounced for underserved students. In response, colleges and universities have sought to improve the quality of online instruction by providing technology resources, student and faculty technical support, and, the focus of this study, professional development for faculty teaching online. However, despite the increasing popularity of professional development for online instructors, evidence on its effectiveness in shaping faculty practices and confidence remains limited. This study used survey data from 82 faculty at two Southern California community colleges following participation in structured professional development programs designed to improve online teaching. The professional development programs focused on core learning theories and practical strategies for engaging virtual learners. We find that the majority of faculty reported adopting techniques related to the creation of a supportive and welcoming environment, recorded video introductions and lectures, and increased student-student interaction. In addition, instructors reported increased confidence in adopting teaching methods in almost all assessed areas. In technical areas, most respondents reported increased confidence in skills related to building an online course, creating online assignments and materials, and interacting with students. In soft skill areas, most respondents reported increased confidence in skills related to development of a welcoming, equitable online environment. These survey results underscore the critical role of professional development in shaping instructors’ online teaching confidence and practices.
References
Allen I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529952.pdf
Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.002
Baran, E., & Correia, A.-P. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. TechTrends, 58(5), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0
Bettinger, E. P., Fox, L., Loeb, S., & Taylor, E. (2017). Changing distributions: How online college classes alter student and professor performance. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2855-2875. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151193
Borup, J., & Evmenova, A. (2019). The effectiveness of professional development in overcoming obstacles to effective online instruction in a college of education. Online Learning, 23(2), https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1468
Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. Internet and Higher Education, 38, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004
Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2020). The effects of training on instructor beliefs about and attitudes toward online teaching. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1692553
Brooks, D. C., & Grajek, S. (2020). Faculty readiness to begin fully remote teaching. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/blogs/2020/3/faculty-readiness-to-begin-fully-remote-teaching
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (2017). Distance education report. https://www.cccco.edu/-/media/CCCCO-Website/docs/report/2017-DE-Report-Final-ADA.pdf
California Virtual Campus-Online Education Initiative. (2020). Course Design Rubric. California Community Colleges. https://onlinenetworkofeducators.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/CVC_OEI_Course_Design_Rubric_rev_April_2020_ACC_52021.pdf
CAST. (2024). Universal design for learning guidelines version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/static/udlg3-graphicorganizer-digital-numbers-a11y.pdf
Chan, R. Y., Bista, K., & Allen, R. M. (2021). Is online and distance learning the future in global higher education? In R. Y. Chan, K. Bista, & R. M. Allen, Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during COVID-19 (1st ed., pp. 3–12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125921-2
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R.L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821-836. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970934
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108327554
Dennen, V. P., Bagdy, L. M., Arslan, Ö., Choi, H., & Liu, Z. (2022). Supporting new online instructors and engaging remote learners during COVID-19: A distributed team teaching approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S182-S202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1924093
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D.R., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Guilbaud, T.C., Martin, F., & Newton, X. (2021). Faculty perception on accessibility in online learning: Knowledge, practice and professional development. Online Learning, 25(2), 6-35. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i2.2233
Hart, C. M. D., Freidmann, E., & Hill, M. (2018). Online course-taking and student outcomes in California Community Colleges. Education Finance and Policy, 13(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00218
Hart, C.M.D., Xu, D., Alonso, E. & Hill, M. (2025). COVID-19 in California Community Colleges: College responses, college resources, and student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 66(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-024-09819-1
Hart, C. M. D., Xu, D., Hill, M., & Alonso, E. (2021a). COVID-19 and community college instructional responses. Online Learning, 25(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2568
Hart, C. M. D., Xu, D., Hill, M., & Alonso, E. (2021b). Everybody pulling in the same direction. The COVID-19 shift to online delivery of instruction and student services. Research Brief 6(6), Wheelhouse: The Center for Community College Leadership and Research. https://education.ucdavis.edu/sites/main/files/wheelhouse_research_brief_vol_6_no_6_final_0.pdf
Hill, M. & Hart, C.M.D. (Forthcoming). Going online: Decision processes of students enrolling in online degree programs. Online Learning.
Jaggars, S.S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
Jaggars, S.S., Edgecombe, N., Georgia West, S. (2013). Creating an effective online instructor presence. Community College Research Center. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED542146
Jaggars, S.S. & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance?. Computers & Education, 95, 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
Jarvie-Eggart, M., Freeman, T., Woerner, J.S., Benjamin, M., & Fernandez-Arcay, L. (2023). Learning to teach well in any format: Examining the effects of online teachers’ training on university faculty teaching. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(2), 52- 69. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i2.5808
Johnson, H., & Mejia, M. C. (2014). Online learning and student outcomes in California’s community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California. https://www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/content/pubs/report/R_514HJR.pdf
Kaplowitz, M.D., Lupi, F., Couper, M.P., & Thorp, L. (2012). The effect of invitation design on web survey response rates. Social Science Computer Review, 30(3), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311419084
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lay, C. D., Allman, B., Cutri, R. M., & Kimmons, R. (2020). Examining a decade of research in online teacher professional development. Frontiers in Education. 5. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.573129
Leary, H., Dopp, C., Turley, C., Cheney, M., Simmons, Z., Graham, C. R., & Hatch, R. (2020). Professional development for online teaching: A literature review. Online Learning, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2198
Lewis, C. C., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2006). Implementing effective online teaching practices: Voices of exemplary faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9010-z
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Mohr, S.,& Shelton, K. (2017). Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning, 21(4), 123-140. https://doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.1273
Nguyen, A. (2017). The Online Education Initiative: Access and quality of online education in California’s Community Colleges 2015-2016. The RP Group. https://cvc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2015-16OEIDisseminationBriefFINAL.pdf
Online Learning Consortium. (n.d.) Workshops with one focus: Excellence in online learning. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/professional-learning/workshops/
Online Network of Educators. (n.d.a.). About us. https://onlinenetworkofeducators.org/about/
Online Network of Educators. (n.d.b.). Catalog of courses and workshops. California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office - California Virtual Campus Online Network of Educators. https://catalog.onlinenetworkofeducators.org/
Pacansky-Brock, M., Smedshammer, M., & Vincent-Layton, K. (2020). Humanizing online teaching to equitize higher education. Current Issues in Education, 21(2), 1-21. https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1905
Paul, J. & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009-2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007
Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1145–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8
Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
Quality Matters (n.d.). Higher Ed Teaching Online Certificate. https://www.qualitymatters.org/professional-development/toc
Richards, K., & Thompson, B. M. W. (2023). Challenges and instructor strategies for transitioning to online learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of literature. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1260421
Rovai, A.P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.10.002
Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001
Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
Seaman, J. E., Elaine Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580852.pdf
Segrave, S., Holt, D., & Farmer, J. (2005). The power of the 6three model for enhancing academic teachers’ capacities for effective online teaching and learning: Benefits, initiatives and future directions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 118-135. https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/1346/716
Sentance, S., & Humphreys, S. (2018). Understanding professional learning for Computing teachers from the perspective of situated learning. Computer Science Education, 28(4), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1525233
Shea, P. & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers and Education, 55, 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
Wolf, P. D. (2006). Best practices in the training of faculty to teach online. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 17(2), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03032698
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711413814
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0028
Xu, D., Li, Q., & Zhou, X. (2020). Online course quality rubric: A tool box. Online Learning Research Center, University of California, Irvine. https://www.olrc.us/uploads/1/2/7/1/127107452/rubric_full_version_0414.pdf
Xu, D., Liu, Y., Shea, Z. M., Vincent-Layton, K., White, J., & Pacansky-Brock, M. (2025). Humanizing college online instruction: The effects of professional development on faculty perceptions and instructional practices. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100998. https://doi.org/10.10 16/J.IHEDUC.2025.100998
Xu, D. & Xu, Y. (2019). The promises and limits of online higher education: understanding how distance education affects access, cost, and quality. American Enterprise Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596296.pdf
Xu, D. & Xu, Y. (2020). The ambivalence about distance learning in higher education: Challenges, opportunities, and policy implications. In Perna, L.W. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11743-6_10-1
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (ISBN: 1416600353).
Zhou, X., Li, Q., & Xu, D. (2025). Does professional development for online instruction improve student course outcomes? The Internet and Higher Education, 65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100993
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Michael S. Hill, Cassandra M.D. Hart, Rachel B. Baker, Di Xu, Emily Alonso, Alyssa Nguyen, Kim d'Arcy, Cheryl Bailey, Tim VanNorman, Vivian Nguyen, Jennifer Pakula
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
