Bichronous Online Learning: Perspectives, Best Practices, Benefits, and Challenges from Award-Winning Online Instructors

Authors

  • Florence Martin North Carolina State University
  • Swapna Kumar
  • Albert Ritzhaupt
  • Drew Polly

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3945

Keywords:

Bichronous online learning, best practices, online instructor perspectives

Abstract

Bichronous online learning is the intentional blending of asynchronous and synchronous online learning experiences. Twelve award-winning online instructors participated in interviews to discuss best practices they use, and benefits and challenges in bichronous online courses. When sharing best practices for bichronous online courses, award-winning online instructors explained how they combined best practices in asynchronous and synchronous online learning. Asynchronous online best practices included course design and structure, resources, and instructor presence; and synchronous online best practices focused on formats, activities, and content of synchronous sessions, and community-building. The best practices, benefits and challenges discussed in this paper have implications for instructors who currently teach in a bichronous online format or may be considering it in the future, and for instructional designers and administrators who work with faculty on offering courses in this modality. Based on the data, the intentional blending of synchronous and asynchronous components has a lot of potential to enhance students’ online learning experiences.

Author Biography

Florence Martin, North Carolina State University

Florence Martin is a Professor in Learning, Design and Technology at North Carolina State University. She previously directed and taught in graduate programs at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte’s Cato College of Education and at University of North Carolina at Wilmington’s Watson College of Education. She received her Doctorate and Master's degrees in Educational Technology from Arizona State University. She teaches 100% online and engages in teaching and research to create transformative learning experiences through effective design and integration of digital learning solutions in higher education and K-12 settings. She is researching and supporting K-12 teachers and learners on computer science and cybersecurity education through NSF funded projects. She has published over 100 articles and has received awards for research and practice of online teaching and learning. She also serves on the advisory council for North Carolina Virtual Public Schools and as Associate Editor for the Online Learning Journal and Education Research Review. She has previously served as the President of the Multimedia Production Division and the president of the Division of Distance Learning for the Association for Educational Communications and Technology and as a director for International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction. More details can be found at http://www.florencemartin.net

References

Conrad, D. & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. Athabasca University Press.

Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An instructional design framework for fostering student engagement in online learning environments. Tech Trends, 60(6), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z

Farros, J. N., Shawler, L. A., Gatzunis, K. S., & Weiss, M. J. (2020). The effect of synchronous discussion sessions in an asynchronous course. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09421-2

Fehrman, S., & Watson, S. L. (2021). A systematic review of asynchronous online discussions in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(3), 200-213.

Fowler, R. C. (2019). The effects of synchronous online course orientation on student attrition. (Doctoral dissertation). https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5346

Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30.

Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 609-617.

Guerrero-Roldán, A.E., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competencies and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36-46.

Kara, N. (2021). Enablers and barriers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of an online university course. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.11

Lehman, C., & Heaviland, L. (2023). Student preferences of student-teacher communication during synchronous online classes. International Journal of English Education, 8(1), 1-14. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25384015.2023.8.1.1.7

Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169-179.

Lowenthal, P., Dunlap, J., & Snelson, C. (2017). Live synchronous web meetings in asynchronous online courses: Reconceptualizing virtual office hours. Online Learning Journal, 21(4).

Lowenthal, P. R. (2022). Exploring student perceptions of asynchronous video in online courses. Distance Education, 43(3), 369-387.

Lumabi, B. M. & Tabajen, R. C. (2021). College students’ experience in online asynchronous peer feedback in writing. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(2), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v2i2.250

Martin, F. & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Martin, F., Kumar, S., Ritzhaupt, A., & Polly, D. (2023). Bichronous online learning: Award-winning online instructor practices of blending asynchronous and synchronous online modalities. The Internet and Higher Education, 56, 100879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100879

Martin, F., Polly, D., & Rithzaupt, A.D. (2020). Bichronous online learning: Blending asynchronous and synchronous online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning

Martin, F., Sun, T., Turk, M., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2021). A meta-analysis on the effects of synchronous online learning on cognitive and affective educational outcomes. International Review of Research on Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 205-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5263

Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003

Muniasamy, A., & Alasiry, A. (2020). Deep learning: The impact on future elearning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 15(1), 188.

National Center for Education Statistics (2022). Postbaccalaureate enrollment: Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https:/nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/chb

Oyarzun, B. A., Conklin, S. A., & Barreto, D. (2017). Instructor presence. In P. Vu, S. Fredrickson, & C. Moore (Eds.), Handbook of research on innovative pedagogies and technologies for online learning in higher education (pp. 106-126). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1851-8.ch006

Oyarzun, B, & Martin, F. (2023). A systematic review of research on online learner collaboration from 2012 –2021: Collaboration technologies, design, facilitation, and outcomes. Online Learning, 27(1), 71-106. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.

Peterson, J. L. (2016). Formative evaluations in online classes. Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 1-24.

Peterson, A. T., Beymer, P. N., Putnam, R. T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517

Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A. A., Besser, E. D., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. M. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3).

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskulru, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Shelton, K. & Saltsman, G. (2011). Applying the ADDIE model to online instruction. Instructional Design: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 566-582). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-503-2.ch305

Stohr, C., Demazière, C., Adawi, T. (202). The polarizing effect of the online flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103789

Strelan, P., Osborn, A. & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 36(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Tallent-Runnels, M. K et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1) 93-125.

Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A. M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D. M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12.

Wang, Y. M. & Chen, D. T. (2017). Assessing online discussions: A holistic approach. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(2), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517717036

Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778

Zotti, R. (2017). The implementation of web conferencing technologies in online graduate classes. (Doctoral dissertation). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED577484

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

How to Cite

Martin, F., Kumar, S., Ritzhaupt, A., & Polly, D. (2024). Bichronous Online Learning: Perspectives, Best Practices, Benefits, and Challenges from Award-Winning Online Instructors. Online Learning, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3945

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 2 (2024): Online Learning

Section

Section II

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Florence Martin, Swapna Kumar, Albert Ritzhaupt, Drew Polly

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.

Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>