Challenges and Benefits of Collaborative Work in Online Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i1.4801Keywords:
online collaborative learning, social presence, instructional design, teaching presenceAbstract
This investigation examined student experiences with online collaborative learning, focusing on the types and frequency of support received and their relationship to the Community of Inquiry framework. An online survey of 110 students revealed that the majority received support from both instructors and peers, with informational support being predominant. Primary benefits included enhanced collaboration skills and increased awareness of others’ perspectives, while challenges primarily involved workload management and scheduling. Higher frequency and clarity of support were correlated with greater teaching and social presence. The findings underscore the significance of balanced, frequent, and clear guidance in online collaborative work, as well as the necessity to address deficiencies in emotional support. Implications for instructional design and faculty development are discussed.
References
Abdu, R., DeGroot, R., & Drachman, R. (2012). Teacher’s role in computer supported collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 7th Chais Conference for Innovation in Learning Technologies (pp. 1-6). Raanana, Israel: The Open University of Israel.
Altınay, Z. (2016). Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2016.1232752
Archambault, L., Leary, H., & Rice, K. (2022). Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513
Baker, J. D. (2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.006
Baker, K. Q., & Moyer, D. M. (2018). The relationship between students’ characteristics and their impressions of online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(1). 16–28. http://doi.org10.1080/ 08923647.2019.1555301
Bangert, A. (2008). The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20, 34-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03033431
Barak, M., Hussein-Farraj, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2016). On-campus or online: Examining self-regulation and cognitive transfer skills in different learning settings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 35. https://doi:10.1186/s41239-016-0035-9
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672
Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021). Generation invisible? Higher education students’ (non)use of webcams in synchronous online learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7brp6
Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176492
Brooks, M., & Brooks, J. (1995). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Brunet, P. M., & Schmidt, L. A. (2007). Is shyness context specific? Relation between shyness and online self-disclosure with and without a live webcam in young adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 938–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.09.001
Cameron, B. A., Morgan, K., Williams, K. C., & Kostelecky, K. L. (2009). Group projects: Student perceptions of the relationship between social tasks and a sense of community in online group work. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802664466
Chapman, K. J., & Van Auken, S. (2001). Creating positive group project experiences: An examination of the role of the instructor on students’ perceptions of group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475301232005
Chapman, C., Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005). Strong community, deep learning: Exploring the link. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500167910
Chatterjee, R., & Correia, A. (2020). Online students’ attitudes toward collaborative learning and sense of community. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1703479
Cherney, M. R., Fetherston, M., & Johnsen, L. J. (2018). Online course student collaboration literature: A review and critique. Small Group Research, 49(1), 98–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417721627
Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 13. 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006
Dawson, S. (2006). A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. iheduc.2006.06.007
Donelan, H., & Kear, K. (2024). Online group projects in higher education: persistent challenges and implications for practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 435-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09360-7
Esarco, A. (2009). Group charters and online group collaboration: Instructional design elements that may enhance the learner's satisfaction with the online learning process (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
Gaad, A. L. V. (2022). The effects of online collaborative learning (OCL) on student achievement and engagement. IAFOR Journal of Education, 10(3), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.10.3.02
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online Community of Inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Online Learning, 11(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737
Garrison, R. (2022). Shared metacognition in a Community of Inquiry. Online Learning, 26(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023
Gibson, P. (2019). Online group work is possible, just not easy. In V. Wang (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Transdisciplinary Knowledge Generation (pp. 231-241). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9531-1.ch017
Grieve, R., Padgett, C. R., & Moffitt, R. L. (2016). Assignments 2.0: The role of social presence and computer attitudes in student preferences for online versus offline marking. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.002
Grothaus, C. (2022). Collaborative online learning across cultures: The role of teaching and social presence. Qualitative Research in Education, 11(3), 298–326. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.10474
Guo, W., Chen, Y., Lei, J., & Wen, Y. (2014). The effects of facilitating feedback on online learners’ cognitive engagement: Evidence from the asynchronous online discussion. Education Sciences, 4(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4020193
Heilporn, G., & Desrochers, M. (2020). Students’ learning support and perceptions in an online mathematics course in a business faculty. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.1.10825
Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers & Education, 138, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012
Ingram, K., Oyarzun, B., Maxwell, D., & Salas, S. (2024). The difference a three-minute video makes: Presence(s), satisfaction, and instructor-confidence in post-pandemic online teacher education. TechTrends, 68(4), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00979-6
Ishtaiwa, F. F., & Aburezeq, I. M. (2015). The impact of Google Docs on student collaboration: A UAE case study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lcsi.2015.07.004
Jeong, H. and Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help?, Educational Psychologist, 51(2). 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An educational psychology success story. Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5). 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Jung, S., Shin, H. W., Gohary, A., & Chan, E. Y. (2022). Benefits and challenges of online collaborative learning from the perspectives of non-traditional event management students: A comparison between asynchronous and synchronous learning. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 23(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2022.2109553
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 684695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., Van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2024). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 763-813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12273-8
Koşar, G. (2021). Online collaborative learning: Does it improve college students’ critical reading skills? Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 5114–5126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1998137
Kozar, O. (2016). Perceptions of webcam use by experienced online teachers and learners: A seeming disconnect between research and practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1061021
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Group leadership in online collaborative learning. In Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (pp. 975-983). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch149
Kwon, K., Liu, Y. H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.004
Leech, N., Barrett, K., & Morgan, G. (2012). IBM SPSS for intermediate statistics; use and interpretation (4th ed.). Ringgold.
Li, L., Zhang, R., & Piper, A. M. (2023). Predictors of student engagement and perceived learning in emergency online education amidst COVID-19: A community of inquiry perspective. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100326
Lingard, R., & Berry, E. (2002). Teaching teamwork skills in software engineering based on an understanding of factors affecting group performance. In Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual (Vol. 3, p. S3G–1). IEEE. Boston, MA, November 6-9, 2002.
Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147
Martin, F., Kumar, S., & She, L. (2021). Examining higher education instructor roles and competencies for online teaching. Online Learning, 25(4), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2570
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A meta-analysis on the Community of Inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments. Online Learning, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604
Marutschke, D. M., Kryssanov, V., Chaminda, H. T., & Brockmann, P. (2019). Smart education in an interconnected world: Virtual, collaborative, project-based courses to teach global software engineering. In Smart Education and e-Learning 2019 (pp. 39-49). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8260-4_4
McKay, J., & Sridharan, B. (2023). Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677
McPherson, M. A., & Nunes, M. B. (2004). The failure of a virtual social space (VSS) designed to create a learning community: Lessons learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3). 305–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00391.x
Molenaar, I., Roda, C., van Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 59(2), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.006
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Postbaccalaureate enrollment. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/chb
Nilsen, A. G., Almås, A. G., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2013). Teaching online or on-campus?–What students say about desktop videoconferencing. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(01-02), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2013-01-02-06
Ornellas, A., & Muñoz Carril, P. C. (2014). A methodological approach to support collaborative media creation in an e-learning higher education context. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.906916
Oluwajana, D., Adeshola, I., & Clement, S. (2021). Does the use of a web-based collaborative platform reduce cognitive load and influence project-based student engagement? Current Psychology, 42(10), 8265–8278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02145-0
Oyarzun, B., & Martin, F. (2023). A systematic review of research on online learner collaboration from 2012–21: Collaboration technologies, design, facilitation, and outcomes. Online Learning, 27(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407
Paterson, T., & Prideaux, M. (2020). Exploring collaboration in online group based assessment contexts: Undergraduate business program. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(3), 3. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss3/3
Pena-Shaff, J. B., & Altman, W. S. (2009). Case-based instruction using asynchronous online discussions: A synthesis. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 20(3), 97-121.
Peterson, A. T., Beymer, P. N., & Putnam, R. T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning, 22(4), 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking Press.
Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2020). Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1839024
Revere, L., & Kovach, J. V. (2011). Online technologies for engaged learning: A meaningful synthesis for educators. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(2), 113–124.
Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268
Robinson, H., Kilgore, W., & Warren, S. (2017). Care, communication, support: Core for designing meaningful online collaborative learning. Online Learning, 21(4).
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Using web-based, group communication systems to support case study learning at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i2.107
Rovai, A. P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online college learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.10.002
Saqr, M., Nouri, J., Jormanainen, I. (2019). A learning analytics study of the effect of group size on social dynamics and performance in online collaborative learning. In: Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., Schneider, J. (eds) Transforming learning with meaningful technologies. EC-TEL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11722. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_35
Saqr, M., & López-Pernas, S. (2023). The temporal dynamics of online problem-based learning: Why and when sequence matters. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09385-1
Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022). Building bridges to advance the Community of Inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989
Sims, R. (2003). Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303050
Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 12 ,40–62.
Sonji, G., Sonji, N., Hammoudi Halat, D., Mourad, N., Rahal, M., & Mehyou, Z. (2023). Pharmacy students’ perceptions and satisfaction with blended instruction in quantitative chemical analysis course. Pharmacy Education, 23(1), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.269282
Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing: Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In J.W. Strijbos, P.A. Kirschner, & R.L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL. Computer-supported collaborative learning series (Vol. 3, pp. 53–85). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_3
Strauss, S., & Rummel, N. (2020). Promoting interaction in online distance education: Designing, implementing and supporting collaborative learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0090
Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
Tolu, A. T. (2013). Creating effective Communities of Inquiry in online courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.157
Trespalacios, J. (2017). Exploring small group analysis of instructional design cases in online learning environments. Online Learning, 21(1), 189–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i1.928
Tu, C. H., & Corry, M. (2002). Research in online learning community. E-journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 5(1), 1-10.
Tseng, H. W., & Yeh, H. T. (2013). Team members’ perceptions of online teamwork learning experiences and building teamwork trust: A qualitative study. Computers & Education, 63, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.013
Van Thien, N. (2021). Effectiveness of online learning when implementing collaborative online learning in flipped classroom. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 26, 234-249. https://doi/org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5253
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2016). Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of transactivity. Instructional Science, 44(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34-41.
Warsah, I., Morganna, R., Uyun, M., Hamengkubuwono, & Afandi, M. (2021). The impact of collaborative learning on learners’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14225a
Wengrowicz, N., Swart, W., Paul, R., Macleod, K., Dori, D., & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Students’ collaborative learning attitudes and their satisfaction with online collaborative case-based courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1511509
Wentzel, K. R., & Watkins, D. E. (2011). Instruction based on peer interactions. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 322–343). New York, NY: Routledge.
Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students’ motivation in peer‐moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x
Yoon, S. A., Miller, K., Richman, T., Wendel, D., Schoenfeld, I., Anderson, E., & Shim, J. (2020). Encouraging collaboration and building community in online asynchronous professional development: Designing for social capital. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09326-2
Zhang, Y., Hussain, S., Huang, J., & Dong, Y. (2023). Investigating the impact of the Community of Inquiry presence on online learning satisfaction: A Chinese college student perspective. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1883–1896. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s409229
Zheng, X., Zhou, C., & Johnson, T. E. (2020). A pilot study examining the impact of collaborative mind mapping strategy in a flipped classroom: Learning achievement, self-efficacy, motivation, and students’ acceptance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3527–3545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09868-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sheri Conklin, Stella Kim, Daniel Maxwell, Beth Oyarzun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions
