Editorial: AI, ghosts in the machine, and AINT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v30i3.6577Keywords:
artificial intelligence, academic integrity, Generative AI, agentic AI, Critical Thinking, online learningAbstract
As we bring you another issue of Online Learning, (the third issue of our 30th year of publication by the way), I wanted again to include some reflections on the topic of AI and academic integrity. As noted by many journal editors, we are seeing exponential growth in the number of AI generated submissions to journals. Recently, an essay in the Chronicle of Higher Education by Mya Poe (2026) noted that the influx of AI generated papers was degrading scholarship, making it more difficult for authors of papers to attract citations who were located in the “missing middle”.
References
Bozkurt, A., Crompton, H., & Fell Kurban, C. (2026). The devil is in the det[ai]ls: AI agents, ghost students, and the crisis of verified presence in an agentic AI world. Open Praxis, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.18.1.1145
Doctorow, C. (2026). The reverse centaur’s guide to life after AI: How to think about artificial intelligence—before it’s too late. MCD.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Goldstein, D. (2026, August 17). What do students lose when they stop writing? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/17/us/student-writing-essays-ai.html
Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A. V., Braunstein, I., & Maes, P. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872
Mills, A. (2026, January 27). AI feedback customized for student writers: The updated PAIRR prompts. Anna Mills’ Substack. https://annamills.substack.com/p/ai-feedback-customized-for-student
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.10052
Narayanan, A., & Kapoor, S. (2025). AI snake oil: What artificial intelligence can do, what it can’t, and how to tell the difference (Updated ed.). Princeton University Press.
Narayanan, A., & Kapoor, S. (2025, September 9). A guide to understanding AI as normal technology. AI as Normal Technology. https://www.normaltech.ai/p/a-guide-to-understanding-ai-as-normal
Poe, M., & Dryer, D. B. (2026, August 10). AI is ruining scholarship. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/ai-is-ruining-scholarship
Ray, S. E. (2026, August 12). The next wave of AI-cheating technology. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-next-wave-of-ai-cheating-technology
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Peter Shea

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to OLJ articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This licence allows anyone to reproduce OLJ articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions

